{"id":73603,"date":"2017-07-25T14:22:35","date_gmt":"2017-07-25T18:22:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/valorguardians.com\/blog\/?p=73603"},"modified":"2017-07-25T14:32:26","modified_gmt":"2017-07-25T18:32:26","slug":"afghan-uniform-dust-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=73603","title":{"rendered":"Afghan uniform dust-up"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><center><a href=\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?attachment_id=73604\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-73604\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/Afghan-uniforms-300x169.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"169\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-73604\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/Afghan-uniforms-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/Afghan-uniforms-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/Afghan-uniforms-500x281.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/Afghan-uniforms.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/center><\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/story\/news\/politics\/2017\/06\/21\/pentagon-blew-28-million-uniforms-afghan-soldiers-report-says\/413219001\/\">USAToday<\/a> reports that Congress is criticizing the Pentagon for buying a woodland pattern uniform for our Afghan allies;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> The Pentagon wasted as much as $28 million over the past decade buying uniforms for the Afghan army with a woodland camouflage pattern appropriate for a tiny fraction of that war-torn country, according to the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction.<\/p>\n<p>The Afghan Defense Minister picked the pricey, privately owned \u201cforest\u201d color pattern over free camouflage schemes owned by the U.S. government, according to an advance copy of the report due out on Wednesday. The scathing, 17-page study notes that \u201cforests cover only 2.1% of Afghanistan\u2019s total land area.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2017\/07\/24\/congress-demands-to-know-why-pentagon-bought-93-million-of-useless-camo\/\">Daily Caller<\/a> quotes camouflage expert, Senator Claire McCaskill;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Members of Congress from both parties want the Pentagon to answer for purchasing camouflage for Afghan forces that is the wrong pattern for the region.<\/p>\n<p>Missouri Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill voiced her frustration over the potential waste of $28 million in a letter to the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), USA Today reports.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is a contracting decision that makes you smack your head in frustration,\u201d McCaskill said in a statement. \u201cIt\u2019s a prime example of wasting hard-earned taxpayer dollars, and we\u2019ve got to get to the bottom of how this happened.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Personally, I&#8217;m sick and tired of all of this talk about an &#8220;effective&#8221; camouflage pattern. When I invaded Iraq in 1991, I was wearing woodland pattern BDUs because we only had one set of desert pattern uniforms and mine was dirty &#8211; it really didn&#8217;t matter what color, or pattern, uniform I had anyway. Within ten seconds of putting my uniform on and rolling around in the terrain, my uniform matched my surroundings.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t give a tiny rat&#8217;s ass what those pointy-headed people at Natick say, a camouflage pattern is no more than a fashion statement &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t protect anyone, it doesn&#8217;t make you magically invisible, it&#8217;s covered with dirt and mud as soon as you take cover, so it doesn&#8217;t really matter. Anyone who says otherwise has never spent a moment as a real soldier.<\/p>\n<p>From the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/checkpoint\/wp\/2017\/07\/25\/mattis-upbraids-pentagon-over-afghan-uniform-spending\/?utm_term=.9dad65d2b765\">Washington Post<\/a>;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The report said that the then-Afghan defense minister picked the uniform because he liked its aesthetics and the Pentagon supported the decision with little oversight, wasting millions over a 10-year period because of the camouflage\u2019s \u201cproprietary status\u201d and the fact that the U.S. military could have provided less complicated uniforms at a significantly cheaper cost.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Aesthetics is all that matters for uniforms, if anything ever really counts. For decades we wore the old OD green single-color fatigues, in combat and in the messhall on KP. They were cheap (I think a set cost $12) and durable and then the VOLAR (Volunteer Army) decided that we needed permanent press fatigues. Those of us in some infantry units wore camouflaged uniforms for the field and then everyone wanted cool camo &#8211; even pregos needed camo. Now, its a topic of discussion in unit meetings and in the halls of Congress because everyone wants to give input on fashion. <\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s an idea, pay as much attention to winning the war against terror as you put towards fashion and tattoos.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The USAToday reports that Congress is criticizing the Pentagon for buying a woodland pattern uniform for &hellip; <a title=\"Afghan uniform dust-up\" class=\"hm-read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=73603\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Afghan uniform dust-up<\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":73604,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[89],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73603","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-congress-sucks"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73603","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=73603"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73603\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/73604"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=73603"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=73603"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=73603"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}