{"id":61839,"date":"2015-09-15T07:25:56","date_gmt":"2015-09-15T11:25:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/valorguardians.com\/blog\/?p=61839"},"modified":"2015-09-15T08:10:09","modified_gmt":"2015-09-15T12:10:09","slug":"yet-another-private-email-update","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=61839","title":{"rendered":"Yet Another &#8220;Private Email&#8221; Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Well, we have a few new bits of news regarding the Clintoon \u201cprivate email\u201d brouhaha.<\/p>\n<p>So, Clintoon\u2019s lawyers have turned over all her \u201cprivate email\u201d? Well, maybe \u2013 or maybe not. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wnd.com\/2015\/09\/5-month-gap-in-hillary-emails\/\">There are gaps totaling roughly 5 months in what was turned over to government authorities by Clintoon\u2019s lawyers<\/a>. Specifically, in what was released by Clintoon&#8217;s lawyers there\u2019s roughly 2 months with no email received by Clintoon: 21 January thru 17 March 2009. There\u2019s also a roughly 3 month gap in email sent by Clintoon: 21 Jan thru 17 April 2009 &#8211; plus another sent email gap for her last month in office, 30 December 2012 thru 1 Feb 2013.<\/p>\n<p>And then we have this: a senior DoS records management official apparently stated in an email to a colleague that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/press-room\/press-releases\/judicial-watch-new-state-department-documents-reveal-hillary-clinton-email-gap\/\">they did not want to discuss certain matters by email, but instead wanted to discuss the matter in person<\/a>. Why? Well here\u2019s one possible reason: as that official knows quite well, email is considered a Federal record \u2013 and can be requested under a FOIA request. Verbal discussions that generate no written records are much easier to hide. (The specific details of what were to be discussed were redacted in the email from the senior DoS records management official that\u00a0was made public. However, since that email was obtained by Judicial Watch in conjunction with the Clintoon private email scandal, it\u2019s reasonable to infer the subject was &#8211; or was related to &#8211; the Clintoon email matter.)<\/p>\n<p>Oh, and it seems that Congress is starting to get a bit fed up with the matter, too. <a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/blogs\/floor-action\/senate\/253608-gop-pushes-doj-on-clinton-staffer\">They\u2019ve asked the Attorney General to weigh in<\/a> on whether or not they can meet privately with Brian Pagliano (the staffer who set up Clintoon\u2019s private email server) and his lawyers while determining whether to grant Pagliano immunity and then compel him to testify. It seems that Pagliano\u2019s lawyers are pulling out all the stops to prevent this; they\u2019ve raised questions as to whether such a private meeting would constitute a waiver of Pagliano\u2019s 5th Amendment rights.\u00a0 A couple of Congressmen have therefore asked the Attorney General for a formal reading on the subject. I guess Pagliano\u2019s lawyers must never previously have been involved with similar private discussions with prosecutors with or on the behalf of other clients regarding possible testimony in exchange for immunity. Silly me \u2013 I thought lawyers did that on occasion.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s all for today, but stay tuned \u2013 this one seems worth watching.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Well, we have a few new bits of news regarding the Clintoon \u201cprivate email\u201d brouhaha. So, &hellip; <a title=\"Yet Another &#8220;Private Email&#8221; Update\" class=\"hm-read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=61839\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Yet Another &#8220;Private Email&#8221; Update<\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":623,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[213,185,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-61839","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-your-tax-dollars-at-work","category-crime","category-foreign-policy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61839","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/623"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=61839"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61839\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=61839"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=61839"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=61839"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}