{"id":5486,"date":"2008-11-22T09:25:25","date_gmt":"2008-11-22T14:25:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/valorguardians.com\/blog\/?p=5486"},"modified":"2008-11-22T09:25:25","modified_gmt":"2008-11-22T14:25:25","slug":"the-nyt-on-substance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=5486","title":{"rendered":"The NYT on “substance”"},"content":{"rendered":"

I was reading my morning news sources and stopped at Michelle Malkin<\/a>‘s place (making a statement like that seems to anger the hella-lefties<\/a>, so I may do it every day) to read about how the Left is still making the transition from Palin Derangement Syndrome.<\/p>\n

Michelle added a New York Times article<\/a> from the editorial board but I couldn’t get past the first line without giggling.<\/p>\n

We\u2019ve differed with Sarah Palin a great deal on substance.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Ha! Substance? When? Stupid New York Times. The New York Times wouldn’t know substance if it bit them on their collective face. They disagreed with her on every aspect of the way she’s chosen to live her life (isn’t that what pro-choice is really about?) everything she wears, her choice of a husband, her geographic location, even her choice of carrying children to the full term of her pregnancy. But please, New York Times editorial board, please don’t call that “substance”.<\/p>\n

The New York Times Editorial board is nothing if not superficial. They sniff at any politician who doesn’t come from the East Coast (or at least someone who didn’t go to school there) as if they have manure on their shoes. The New York Times editorial board should just admit that they’re no different than the average\u00a0 lifestyle columnist.<\/p>\n

Oh, and the incident about which they disagree with her in this editorial? The backdrop of an interview. How superficial can you get? The substance of the interview was in the foreground, but the Times is worried about what’s happening in the background. Just like their whole coverage of Sarah Palin.<\/p>\n

Substance? I’m still chuckling.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I was reading my morning news sources and stopped at Michelle Malkin‘s place (making a statement … The NYT on “substance”<\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5486","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5486","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5486"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5486\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5486"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5486"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5486"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}