So, I’m sitting here watching the videos taken last night in Ferguson, Missouri and folks seem to be firing guns at the police. So, it struck me that we haven’t heard from the Mayors Against Illegal Guns or Americans for Responsible Solutions, you know, respectively, the Nanny Bloomberg and Giffords family hand-wringing organizations which seem to pop up every time a gun is fired in the news. In fact, I cruised over to their websites and the Giffords are currently involved in legislation to confiscate guns from folks who have restraining orders filed against them (without due process) and the Bloomberg crowd are more concerned about stopping the legal practice of carrying long guns openly in Krogers supermarkets.<\/p>\n
But, it seems to me that folks who are shooting at police are criminals, and this scenario is ripe for hand-wringing by these Mayors (Ferguson has a mayor, right?) and the Giffords who claim that they want “responsible solutions” for keeping firearms from being used in crimes. Well, here are firearms crimes unfolding on my television screen and the gun grabbers have nothing to say about actual criminals using guns in crimes.<\/p>\n
But, then, if criminals were somehow prevented from using guns, these folks would be out of business – they’re only concerned in taking guns from legal gun owners who abide by the laws. Criminals don’t usually care about the laws, that’s why they’re criminals. The gun grabbers can only measure their effectiveness (raise money) by taking guns from people who normally do what they’re told. <\/p>\n
I’m not surprised that gun grabbers are ignoring real gun crimes. Like I said, they don’t want to disarm criminals.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"