{"id":42949,"date":"2014-04-12T06:58:34","date_gmt":"2014-04-12T10:58:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/valorguardians.com\/blog\/?p=42949"},"modified":"2014-04-12T09:29:22","modified_gmt":"2014-04-12T13:29:22","slug":"cold-war-prisoners-downey-and-fecteau","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=42949","title":{"rendered":"Extraordinary Fidelity"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Not all POWs are military personnel.\u00a0 The <a href=\"http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/y3gctpw.htm\">Third Geneva Convention of 1949, Article 4, paragraph A.4<\/a>., also accords POW status to civilian personnel serving with or accompanying armed forces in the field, provided that certain conditions are met.<\/p>\n<p>In various conflicts, US civilians serving with US or allied militaries have been taken prisoner by hostile forces.\u00a0 One such US civilian taken prisoner in Southeast Asia was <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ernest_C._Brace\">held in excess of 7 years 10 months<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>However, not all US personnel held by US adversaries technically qualify as POWs.\u00a0 A number of US personnel taken captive while performing official duties during the Cold War were imprisoned by US adversaries for extended periods of time.\u00a0 Yet few if any of them technically qualify as \u201cPrisoners of War\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>This article is a brief account of two such individuals.\u00a0 These individuals exhibited truly amazing perseverance and endurance while imprisoned because of their official duties.\u00a0 Yet few have likely ever heard of them.<\/p>\n<p>These individuals were Richard G. Fecteau and John T. Downey.\u00a0 They were civilian employees of the Central Intelligence Agency.<\/p>\n<p>What makes these individuals&#8217; story worthy of note?\u00a0 They were imprisoned by Communist China during the height of the Cold War.<\/p>\n<p>In Fecteau\u2019s case, he was held for just over <i><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">nineteen years<\/span><\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>Of the two, Fecteau was the &#8220;lucky&#8221; one.\u00a0 Downey was a prisoner for <i><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">over two decades<\/span><\/i>.<\/p>\n<p><b><i>. . . <\/i><\/b><\/p>\n<p>Downey and Fecteau were two young men in the early 1950s, just out of college.\u00a0 Seeking adventure as well as employment, they joined the CIA \u2013 Downey in June 1951, Fecteau a few months later.<\/p>\n<p>They were assigned to activities supporting the development of a \u201cThird Force\u201d in mainland China.\u00a0 This &#8220;Third Force&#8221; was to be composed of alleged Chinese dissident military personnel, and was to be separate and distinct from Chiang Kai-shek&#8217;s Nationalist Chinese forces on Taiwan.\u00a0 The specific operations to which Downey and Fecteau were assigned involved linking these supposed dissidents with CIA-trained Chinese agents.<\/p>\n<p>Yeah, I know you&#8217;re probably thinking, &#8220;Huh? What the . . . ?&#8221; about now.\u00a0 In retrospect, the program obviously turned out to be a case of,<em> &#8220;Well, it seemed like a good idea at the time . . . .&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Though it occurred during the Korean War, this &#8220;Third Force&#8221; program was not itself strictly a part of that conflict.\u00a0 Rather, it predated the Korean War, having been initiated well before that war started.\u00a0 The program began in 1949, during or shortly after the Communist takeover of mainland China.\u00a0 Its long-term objective was to develop a mainland opposition to the Communist regime.<\/p>\n<p>At the time of their ill-fated mission, Downey had been assigned to support the &#8220;Third Force&#8221; program for about a year; Fecteau was recently arrived.\u00a0 For Fecteau, it was to be both his first and last operation with the program.<\/p>\n<p>The clandestine operation that resulted in Fecteau&#8217;s and Downey&#8217;s capture today seems somewhat fantastic &#8211; if not borderline insane.\u00a0 The operation would (1) fly into Manchuria in an ostensibly civilian C-47 cargo aircraft provided by Civil Air Transport (CAT), a CIA-front company; (2) proceed to a prearranged ground location marked by bonfires; (3) deliver supplies\/equipment to agents on the ground via parachute; (4) perform a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fulton_surface-to-air_recovery_system\">Fulton extraction<\/a> of a courier bearing documents; then (5) return this courier and his documents to base. Downey and Fecteau were on board the aircraft to push out cargo being parachuted to Chinese agents and to operate the winch that would &#8220;reel in&#8221; the courier to the plane after extraction (and\/or otherwise assist with his recovery).<\/p>\n<p>Yes, I&#8217;m serious.\u00a0 That <em>really was<\/em> the mission. <em>Cojones muy grandes &#8211; de piedra<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>During the night of 29-30 November 1952, the CAT C-47 penetrated Chinese airspace.\u00a0 The pilots found the marker bonfires; the aircraft air-dropped its cargo.\u00a0 It overflew the extraction location on a &#8220;dry run&#8221;; everything seemed to be in order.\u00a0 So the pilots then circled around and came in &#8220;low and slow&#8221; to execute the Fulton extraction.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, the operation had been compromised.\u00a0 When the CAT C-47 approached the extraction location the second time &#8211; flying at extremely low altitude and very slow (just above stall speed) &#8211; it was engaged by concealed Chinese .50 caliber antiaircraft guns.\u00a0 Fire appeared to be primarily focused on the aircraft&#8217;s cockpit and engines; this fact likely saved Downey&#8217;s and Fecteau&#8217;s lives.<\/p>\n<p>The aircraft was disabled, and belly-landed in an open field near where it had been ambushed.\u00a0 The two CIA pilots \u2013 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cia.gov\/news-information\/featured-story-archive\/2007-featured-story-archive\/schwartz-and-snoddy.html\">Norman Schwartz and Robert Snoddy<\/a> \u2013 are believed to have died at the scene.\u00a0 They were never seen alive again.\u00a0\u00a0 (Snoddy&#8217;s remains were recovered from the site in 2004, and identified in 2005.\u00a0 Schwartz&#8217;s remains have yet to be located.)<\/p>\n<p>Fecteau and Downey were not injured.\u00a0 Instead, they were taken prisoner.<\/p>\n<p>It was not long after midnight &#8211; the early morning of 30 November 1952.<\/p>\n<p><strong>. . .<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Fecteau and Downey were held incommunicado under austere conditions for two years &#8211; first in Manchura, then in Bejing.\u00a0 Other than being beaten during capture, they were not significantly tortured physically (they were on occasion physically manhandled).\u00a0 However, they were interrogated at extreme lengths, sometimes for up to 20 hours daily, for a protracted period of time; were subjected to extensive sleep deprivation; and held in isolation.\u00a0 Their fate was unknown outside of China.<\/p>\n<p>Downey had it the worst, as the communist Chinese knew much about him and his role with the CIA.\u00a0 (The Chinese had apparently captured and broken some of the Chinese agents Downey had trained.\u00a0 This is also believed to be how the operation on which they were captured was compromised.)\u00a0 Fecteau was new, and was thus an unknown quantity to the Chinese; he had more latitude to MSU and get away with it.\u00a0 But he wasn&#8217;t treated much if any better by their captors.<\/p>\n<p>After two years in prison, Fecteau and Downey were tried together by a Chinese military tribunal.\u00a0 It was the first time they had seen each other since shortly after their capture.<\/p>\n<p>Downey \u2013 deemed to be the \u201cChief Culprit\u201d by the Chinese &#8211; received a sentence of life imprisonment from the tribunal.\u00a0 Fecteau \u2013 deemed to be the \u201cAssistant Chief Culprit\u201d &#8211; received a lesser sentence of &#8220;only&#8221; 20 years.<\/p>\n<p>They were returned to prison.\u00a0 Each endured long periods of isolation.\u00a0 In one case, one of the two (it&#8217;s not clear which, or if this pertained to both) was held in solitary confinement for six years.\u00a0 Their cells were drab, small, cold, drafty &#8211; and constantly lighted.<\/p>\n<p>When US POWs held by China from the Korean War (there were 11) were returned to US custody in 1955, Downey and Fecteau were not released.\u00a0 They remained in China.<\/p>\n<p>During their captivity, they were usually not permitted to communicate with each other.\u00a0 And the Chinese played substantial &#8220;mind games&#8221; with them &#8211; alternately relaxing conditions, then making conditions much more severe &#8211; on an irregular basis.\u00a0 They attempted to &#8220;reeducate&#8221; each in the &#8220;goodness&#8221; of Marxism.<\/p>\n<p>This went on and on, for literally years &#8211; first 5, then 10, then 15.\u00a0 Their captivity simply . . . continued.<\/p>\n<p>No, they didn&#8217;t endure the extreme physical abuse that many US POWs in Vietnam endured.\u00a0 But they also didn&#8217;t get released after a few years in captivity, either.\u00a0 Take the longest-held US POW ever, add a <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">decade<\/span> to his captivity &#8211; and that doesn&#8217;t equal the length of their imprisonment.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, progress concerning negotiating their release was glacial. The years dragged on and on; nothing much happened regarding their release.\u00a0 Diplomatically, securing their release from China was a &#8220;non-starter&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Then came the US-Chinese diplomatic &#8220;thaw&#8221; of the early 1970s.\u00a0 A Chinese tribunal convened during that thaw authorized Fecteau&#8217;s release; he entered Hong Kong from Canton on 13 December 1971.\u00a0 The same tribunal reduced Downey&#8217;s sentence from life to time already served plus an additional 5 years.\u00a0 He was retained by the Chinese until after his mother had suffered a severe stroke in early March 1973.\u00a0 Downey was released not long afterwards, on 12 March.<\/p>\n<p>At the time of his release, Fecteau had spent 19 years 13 days as a prisoner.\u00a0 Downey had been imprisoned for 20 years 3 months 12 days when he was released.<\/p>\n<p><strong>. . .<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Contrary to some published accounts, the CIA did not &#8220;abandon&#8221; Downey and Fecteau.\u00a0 When they were revealed by the Chinese to be still alive, both were reinstated on the CIA payroll at full pay.\u00a0 Their cases were championed by the CIA&#8217;s then Chief of Casualty Affairs (and later Deputy Director for Personnel), <a href=\"http:\/\/h-net.msu.edu\/cgi-bin\/logbrowse.pl?trx=vx&amp;list=h-itam&amp;month=0404&amp;week=b&amp;msg=f8ykOGOac6Av\/B%2BSfZlubA&amp;user=&amp;pw=\">Ben DeFelice<\/a>.\u00a0 Each was promoted while imprisoned to the level it was reasonably expected they would have attained at that point in their career as Agency employees, eventually reaching the journeyman level (which at the CIA was GS-13 for Intelligence Officers).\u00a0 They were also promoted one additional grade (each retired as GS-14s).\u00a0 Comprehensive efforts were made to manage their financial affairs in their absence; their families&#8217; financial needs were taken care of, and their pay invested on their behalf.\u00a0 On release each had a substantial net worth ($140,000 for Fecteau, $170,000 for Downey &#8211;\u00a0<em>in the early 1970s)<\/em>.\u00a0 Further, US officials consistently worked to secure their release from Communist China.<\/p>\n<p>Downey and Fecteau were extensively debriefed after their release from captivity.\u00a0 Afterwards, each was restored to full CIA employment.\u00a0 The Agency engaged in a bit of \u201ccreative personnel management\u201d to allow each to recuperate from their imprisonment, and to retire from the Agency if they desired.\u00a0 Maximum possible service credit was given to each.\u00a0 All of their technically-forfeited leave was restored, and they were also each granted a full year of additional paid \u201cconvalescent leave\u201d.\u00a0 (The same was common practice at the time for military POWs released from captivity.) While convalescing, Downey went to Harvard Law School.\u00a0 Fecteau chose to work on various home projects, supported his aged parents, and worked temporarily as a probation officer.<\/p>\n<p>Downey retired from the Agency in 1976; Fecteau, in 1977.\u00a0 Each was honored by the CIA with the Distinguished Intelligence Medal.\u00a0 In 1998 &#8211; 25 years after Downey&#8217;s release &#8211; they were further honored by being awarded the Director\u2019s Medal.<\/p>\n<p>Both men lived full, productive post-Agency lives.\u00a0 Downey received his law degree and later became a judge in Connecticut, specializing in juvenile matters.\u00a0 He\u2019s now retired from that second career, but as of 2006 was still hearing cases 3-4 days weekly on an as-needed basis.<\/p>\n<p>Fecteau sought permanent employment as a parole officer after his retirement from the CIA.\u00a0 (Ironically, Fecteau was disqualified from permanent employment in that field because he&#8217;d spent 19 years in prison &#8211; and he was not hired.\u00a0 &#8220;Teh stoopid&#8221; regarding government hiring rules is apparently <em>not<\/em> a recent development.)\u00a0 Fecteau was hired by his alma mater, Boston College; he eventually became their assistant Athletic Director.\u00a0 He reconnected with his then-adult daughters (they were 2 when he was taken prisoner), and also remarried his first wife.\u00a0 Like Downey, Fecteau has now retired from his second career.<\/p>\n<p>Both men are still alive today.<\/p>\n<p><strong>. . .<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>An unclassified, official CIA account of Fecteau\u2019s and Downey\u2019s ordeals from 2006 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cia.gov\/library\/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence\/csi-publications\/csi-studies\/studies\/vol50no4\/two-cia-prisoners-in-china-1952201373.html\">can be found here<\/a>.\u00a0 It\u2019s fascinating reading, and is IMO worth the time.<\/p>\n<p>In 2011, the CIA took the unusual step of publicly releasing an hour-long film detailing Fecteau and Downey\u2019s ordeal.\u00a0 The film is entitled \u201cExtraordinary Fidelity\u201d; it is available for viewing <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/Z0Mh7EiXRJI\">on YouTube<\/a>.\u00a0 A full transcript of the film is also <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cia.gov\/library\/video-center\/video-transcripts\/extraordinary-fidelity.html\">available here<\/a>.\u00a0 If you watch the film, it might be a good idea to have a handkerchief or tissue handy.<\/p>\n<p>No Downey and Fecteau weren&#8217;t military.\u00a0 And I guess they weren&#8217;t technically POWs, either.\u00a0 But IMO they deserve the same respect as is due any POW.\u00a0 YMMV.<\/p>\n<p>The film\u2019s title is IMO apropos.\u00a0 \u201cExtraordinary Fidelity\u201d, indeed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>. . .<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This is inadequate as hell, but I&#8217;ll say it anyway.\u00a0 Thank you, gentlemen.\u00a0 Thank you.<\/p>\n<p>And thank you as well, Ben DeFelice &#8211; for making sure these men were not forgotten.\u00a0 May you rest in peace.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Author&#8217;s Notes<\/span>:<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>1.\u00a0 Except as noted below, sources used are linked in the body of the article.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>2.\u00a0 The DPMO list of US personnel who were unaccounted for after Cold War incidents <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dtic.mil\/dpmo\/cold_war\/reports\/documents\/cold_war_name.pdf\">may be found here<\/a>.\u00a0 Including Downey and Fecteau, only 18 of these 172 individuals returned to US control alive.\u00a0 Though all are now presumed dead, some have still not been fully accounted for today.<br \/>\n<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Six civilian personnel &#8211; all employees of the CIA &#8211; are on that list.\u00a0 (A seventh individual on that list is listed as &#8220;CIV&#8221;, but this appears to be an administrative error.\u00a0 That individual is also listed as having a service number, having the the rank of &#8220;ENS&#8221;, and was lost in an incident involving\u00a0 the shootdown of a USN PV2 having a military crew over the Formosa Strait on 18 January 1953.)\u00a0 <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Four of these US civilian personnel &#8211; Downey, Fecteau, Snoddy, and Schwartz &#8211; are discussed in the article above.\u00a0 The other two Cold War civilian MIAs were Wallace Buford and James McGovern, CIA civilian pilots who were lost in the crash of a CAT C-119 at Dien Bien Phu, North Vietnam, on 6 May 1954.<br \/>\n<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>McGovern&#8217;s and Snoddy&#8217;s remains have been located and repatriated.\u00a0 Buford&#8217;s and Schwartz&#8217;s remains have not.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>3.\u00a0 Two US military pilots were held captive in China during the Vietnam war &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philip_E._Smith\">Capt. Philip E. Smith<\/a>, USAF, and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Robert_J._Flynn\">LT Robert J. Flynn<\/a>, USN.\u00a0 Both were shot down over Chinese territory during the Vietnam War.\u00a0 (Smith was held captive for a time with Downey and Fecteau).\u00a0 Both were released on 15 March 1973.\u00a0 Like Downey and Fecteau, they were released in Canton and walked across the border into Hong Kong.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Since both Smith and Flynn were military personnel participating in military operations of the Vietnam War when they were captured, both are formally recognized as former POWs by the US Government.\u00a0 To the best of my knowledge, all personnel on the Cold War list &#8211; civilian and military &#8211; who were taken captive and later repatriated are not.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Not all POWs are military personnel.\u00a0 The Third Geneva Convention of 1949, Article 4, paragraph A.4., &hellip; <a title=\"Extraordinary Fidelity\" class=\"hm-read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=42949\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Extraordinary Fidelity<\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":623,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,217],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42949","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-historical","category-we-remember"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42949","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/623"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=42949"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42949\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=42949"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=42949"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=42949"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}