{"id":40036,"date":"2014-02-26T11:09:02","date_gmt":"2014-02-26T16:09:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/valorguardians.com\/blog\/?p=40036"},"modified":"2014-02-26T11:09:02","modified_gmt":"2014-02-26T16:09:02","slug":"defense-budget-battle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=40036","title":{"rendered":"Defense budget battle"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.stripes.com\/news\/us\/congress-signals-tough-fight-for-pentagon-plan-1.269835\">The Associated Press<\/a> reports that the Obama Administration has a tough fight ahead if they try to adopt Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel&#8217;s plan to slash the Defense budget by cutting troops and aircraft that have no plan to replace;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> The skepticism from both Republicans and Democrats augured poorly for Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel&#8217;s vision of shrinking the Army to its smallest size in three-quarters of a century and creating a nimbler force more suited to future threats than the large land wars in Iraq and Afghanistan over the last decade. Tuesday&#8217;s advance of a new veterans bill also suggested Congress may be more interested in increasing military spending in a midterm election year.<\/p>\n<p>The cuts &#8220;will weaken our nation&#8217;s security while the threats we face around the world are becoming more dangerous and complex,&#8221; Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham, two leading GOP hawks, said in a joint statement. &#8220;Now is not the time to embrace a defense posture reminiscent of the years prior to World War II,&#8221; they said, without outlining substitute cost reductions.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>From <a href=\"http:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/politics\/2014\/02\/25\/increased-domestic-spending-may-be-behind-proposed-military-cuts-cbo-report\/\">Fox News<\/a>, the Congressional Budget Office speculates that the whole reason behind the cuts is so that the administration can spend more money on domestic programs, ignoring defense needs;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Rep. Chris Van Hollen , D-Md., told Fox News the draw down from two wars is a logical time to save defense money. &#8220;We do not need for the defense of our country to be able to have a defense doctrine that calls for fighting two land wars at the same time,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>But history is filled with hard lessons in disarmament. Churchill warned a pacifist Britain, worn out from massive loss of life in World War I, of its unpreparedness for war with Germany as early as 1934. In 1936, he said in a speech to a disinterested Parliament, &#8220;A lack of clear thinking, confusion of counsel until the emergency comes&#8230; until self-preservation strikes its jarring gong&#8230; these are the features which constitute the endless repetition of history.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>McKeon offers a contemporary reprise of Churchill\u2019s words. &#8220;The price is going to be paid for this whether it&#8217;s in the Middle East, whether it&#8217;s in the Pacific, whether it&#8217;s in Europe,&#8221; he said. &#8220;I don&#8217;t know where. I don&#8217;t know when. I don&#8217;t know how, but some bad actor is going to challenge us.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The capability for fighting two land wars existed long before 9\/11, it existed because we had an enemy that was a global threat, much like the threat, on a smaller scale of al Qaeda which is gaining ground in the middle east and fighting, with some success in Africa. They&#8217;ve already secured portions of Iraq and Afghanistan isn&#8217;t far behind, as well as Syria. Did I mention that Iran is flexing it&#8217;s puny muscles off of our coast?<\/p>\n<p>My Obama apologist friends on Facebook tell me that this proposal from the Obama Administration isn&#8217;t his fault &#8211; that he&#8217;s getting bad advice from his generals who are secretly working for the defense industry. I&#8217;d almost believe it if they could show me just one instance when Obama ever listened to his generals in regards to anything. Well, that and the fact that I predicted this very scenario way back in 2008 before Obama ever took office. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Associated Press reports that the Obama Administration has a tough fight ahead if they try &hellip; <a title=\"Defense budget battle\" class=\"hm-read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=40036\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Defense budget battle<\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46,198,84],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-40036","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-barack-obama","category-big-army","category-military-issues"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40036","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=40036"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40036\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=40036"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=40036"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=40036"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}