{"id":38276,"date":"2013-11-04T10:30:12","date_gmt":"2013-11-04T14:30:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/valorguardians.com\/blog\/?p=38276"},"modified":"2013-11-04T10:35:01","modified_gmt":"2013-11-04T14:35:01","slug":"about-that-proposed-national-cemetery-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=38276","title":{"rendered":"About That Proposed National Cemetery Law . . . ."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Burial in a National Cemetery is a benefit accorded to most veterans.\u00a0 However, as is the case with most government benefits, it\u2019s not a right guaranteed by the Constitution.\u00a0 Congress created the benefit, and Congress can set the rules as it sees fit.<\/p>\n<p>Congress occasionally does change the rules about burial in National Cemeteries, or allow the VA to do so.*\u00a0 Today, those rules are considerably more lenient than I&#8217;d personally prefer.\u00a0 A veteran with a Dishonorable Discharge is banned by law from burial in a National Cemetery; all others who qualify legally as veterans &#8211; including those who accepted discharge in lieu of court-martial or received a Bad Conduct Discharge &#8211; can be.\u00a0 (Those with less than an honorable discharge are evaluated on a case-by-case basis and can be buried in National Cemeteries if the VA approves.)<\/p>\n<p>Congress has placed a number of legal restrictions on burial in National Cemeteries.\u00a0 The aforementioned ban on those with a DD being buried therein is one such legal restriction.\u00a0 Another is the fact that even an honorably discharged veteran loses the benefit if he or she (1) is convicted of a capital crime, (2) dies before they can be tried for a capital crime, or (3) if clear and convincing evidence exists that the individual committed a capital crime.<\/p>\n<p>However, there is presently no legal authority for the VA to order the removal remains once interred.\u00a0 And that apparent omission in the law has led to the following conundrum.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->A veteran of Afghanistan apparently went \u201coff the rails\u201d in 2012.\u00a0 He murdered one person, injured three others, and then killed himself.<\/p>\n<p>What actually had happened was apparently not clearly known immediately.\u00a0 And before things could be investigated and sorted out, the individual had been buried in a National Cemetery with full military honors \u2013 without the VA ever knowing he was under suspicion of murder.\u00a0 All agree it would have been virtually impossible for the VA to have known of the issue prior to the burial, so it&#8217;s not a case of the VA &#8220;screwing the pooch&#8221;.\u00a0\u00a0 The situation was simply too murky to sort out prior to the funeral.<\/p>\n<p>The victim\u2019s family is understandably bothered by this turn of events.\u00a0 They want the VA to remove the murderer\u2019s remains from the cemetery.\u00a0\u00a0 And IMO, they have a point; had the facts been known at the time of the funeral, the National Cemetery burial would never have occurred.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, the VA has no legal authority to remove the murderer\u2019s remains.\u00a0 Without such authority, they can\u2019t do so.<\/p>\n<p>A bill has been <a href=\"http:\/\/www.armytimes.com\/article\/20131101\/NEWS\/311010020\/VA-vows-help-bill-remove-murderers-from-national-cemeteries\">introduced in Congress to rectify this legal omission<\/a>.\u00a0 The VA has indicated their support, and that they will work with Congress on the technical aspects of the legislation.<\/p>\n<p>On balance, I\u2019d support the proposed law.\u00a0 I have to admit I have misgivings, though.<\/p>\n<p>In this particular case, the proposal would rectify an obvious injustice.\u00a0 But as always, there\u2019s the law of unintended consequences to be considered.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s one scenario (there are multiple):\u00a0 a bar fight occurs between a vet and a non-vet.\u00a0\u00a0 The non-vet is the aggressor, and the vet defends himself.\u00a0 Unfortunately, both end up dead.<\/p>\n<p>The investigation plays out, and the vet is eventually posthumously cleared of any wrongdoing.\u00a0 But it takes 2 months for the investigation to be completed.<\/p>\n<p>When does the veteran\u2019s family get to bury their lost relative?\u00a0 Do they have to wait until the end of the investigation?\u00a0 Does the cemetery allow the burial under such circumstances, at the risk that the deceased might have to be exhumed?<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m not sure there is a perfect solution here.\u00a0 This law fixes what is admittedly a &#8220;corner case&#8221; omission &#8211; one that is already very rare.\u00a0 As I said above, I <em>think<\/em> the proposed law is probably a good idea.\u00a0 But even so, the unintended consequences and potential for abuse certainly exist.\u00a0 It will <em>really<\/em> need to be written carefully, or the \u201ccure\u201d could end up being worse than the \u201cdisease\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Thoughts?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em>*Note:\u00a0 while the Army runs Arlington and the Soldiers-and-Airmans Retirement Home National Cemeteries, in the US the VA generally runs the rest. (The Department of the Interior maintains 14 that are located within National Park\/Monument\/Historical Site boundaries, but only two of them &#8211; Andersonville and Andrew Johnson &#8211; are open to new interments.)\u00a0 Outside of the US and its possessions, US military cemeteries are run by the American Battlefield Monuments Commission.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Burial in a National Cemetery is a benefit accorded to most veterans.\u00a0 However, as is the &hellip; <a title=\"About That Proposed National Cemetery Law . . . .\" class=\"hm-read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=38276\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">About That Proposed National Cemetery Law . . . .<\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":623,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[185,15,118,143],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38276","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-crime","category-legal","category-veterans-issues","category-veterans-affairs-department"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38276","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/623"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=38276"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38276\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=38276"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=38276"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=38276"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}