OK, so the guy who wrote the Esquire article is from the “Center for Investigative Reporting” which is innocuous enough that it didn’t really ring any bells. So today as I researched more, I found this piece of effluvient:<\/p>\n

VA’s disability backlog hurts Navy SEAL who killed bin Laden<\/a><\/p>\n

The Navy SEAL who says he killed Osama bin Laden is unemployed and waiting for disability benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs.<\/p>\n

In an exclusive story for Esquire by Phil Bronstein of the Center for Investigative Reporting, the Shooter adds many details to what already is known about the death of the al-Qaida leader. His name is withheld to protect his identity.<\/p>\n

The Shooter told Bronstein, CIR\u2019s executive chairman, that he alone killed the terrorist leader, recounting minute details of those brief seconds. As the second Navy SEAL up a staircase, he saw bin Laden inside a room.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The author of this piece, on CIR’s website? Aaron Glantz. That name rung a bell, so I went to my book shelf at work, and sure enough, he’s the editor of this piece of shit:<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Really? The “Center for Investigative Reporting” has a guy defending them that couldn’t even see through the bullshit lies of IVAW?<\/p>\n

Layers and layers of fact checkers.<\/p>\n

UPDATE: The Esquire author actually praises Aaron Glantz on the show with the unsufferable balding dude:<\/p>\n

\n