{"id":32473,"date":"2012-10-19T12:20:47","date_gmt":"2012-10-19T16:20:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/valorguardians.com\/blog\/?p=32473"},"modified":"2012-10-19T12:20:47","modified_gmt":"2012-10-19T16:20:47","slug":"should-veterans-endorse-candidates-part-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=32473","title":{"rendered":"Should veterans endorse candidates Part II"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Chief Tango sends us a link to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.armytimes.com\/news\/2012\/10\/military-romney-endorsements-101812w\/\">Military Times<\/a> which has become nothing more than a mouthpiece of the Democrat Party in the closing weeks of the election. Anyway they report that the Romney campaign announced a list of flag officers who have said that they support Romney. <a href=\"http:\/\/m.mittromney.com\/news\/press\/2012\/10\/romney-president-announces-military-advisory-council\">VTWoody sent us the link<\/a> to the list, which he says seems a bit like overkill. And it does&#8230;I didn&#8217;t bother to count them. <\/p>\n<p>But the Military Times goes out to find someone who will criticize the officers for their support, they turn to the previously mentioned Center for New American Security;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Center for New American Security conducted a survey and found that Romney\u2019s level of support remained unchanged when respondents were told that \u201cmost members of the military and veterans\u201d support him.<\/p>\n<p>According to the study, the opposite was true for Obama, whose support ticked up significantly when a different group of respondents were told that \u201cmost members of the military and veterans\u201d support Obama.<\/p>\n<p>The study\u2019s authors say this is probably because many voters already associate the military with Republicans.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSince voters might already expect veterans to support the GOP candidate, Republicans may not benefit much by the additional endorsement,\u201d the study concluded.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Make up your mind, is it that our credibility is eroding, or because we&#8217;re doing what everyone expects? Dinguses.<\/p>\n<p>And then a parting shot, after quoting Dempsey once again;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Some experts worry that senior officer endorsements threaten to politicize the military.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere has been a lot of talk in the national security community about [how] this harms the reputation of the military as the neutral servant of the state,\u201d said Richard Kohn, who teaches military history at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt also sends a very partisan message to the active-duty force that it is OK to be partisan.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It is OK to be partisan while you&#8217;re on active duty, douche-nozzle. These peckerwoods, including Dempsey have scared the active duty force away from voting with their incessant blather about being non-partisan. Gee, I wonder why. Where were they when Jon Soltz, Wesley Clark and Paul Rieckhoff were endorsing candidates?<\/p>\n<p>And the Military Times machine wasn&#8217;t critical at all when they wrote this article when <a href=\"http:\/\/www.armytimes.com\/news\/2012\/09\/military-army-former-ranger-stumps-obama-dnc-090612\/\">a purported former Army Ranger<\/a> who supports Obama this year spoke at the Democrat convention asking for active duty support for Obama.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chief Tango sends us a link to the Military Times which has become nothing more than &hellip; <a title=\"Should veterans endorse candidates Part II\" class=\"hm-read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=32473\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Should veterans endorse candidates Part II<\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[84],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32473","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-military-issues"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32473","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=32473"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32473\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=32473"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=32473"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=32473"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}