{"id":30069,"date":"2012-05-22T09:58:38","date_gmt":"2012-05-22T13:58:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/valorguardians.com\/blog\/?p=30069"},"modified":"2012-05-22T16:14:47","modified_gmt":"2012-05-22T20:14:47","slug":"the-great-icuhaji-debacle-of-12","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=30069","title":{"rendered":"The great ICUHAJI debacle of &#8217;12"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve contacted the lawyer and the author of this article in an unrealized attempt to get the actual lawsuit or filings in the court, but alas nothing so far. Nonetheless, <a href=\"http:\/\/http:\/\/hamptonroads.com\/2012\/05\/chesapeake-man-appeals-after-dmv-revokes-plates\">from the Virginia Pilot comes this little bit of asshattery<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>They were seven letters on the license plates: ICUHAJI.<\/p>\n<p>Phonetically, it could be read, &#8220;I see you, Haji.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>To the Department of Motor Vehicles, the message was considered offensive to Arab Americans and grounds for the tags&#8217; revocation.<\/p>\n<p>But to a former sergeant in the U.S. Army, the plates sent a message of support for the soldiers who served with him during two tours in Iraq.<\/p>\n<p>Sean Bujno of Chesapeake, who was honorably discharged in 2009, is appealing last month&#8217;s decision by the DMV to revoke his plates. In Circuit Court documents, he contends that DMV Commissioner Richard Holcomb violated his free-speech rights and his 14th Amendment right to due process.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>OK, first, I really don&#8217;t see how that sends a message of support, but to each their own I suppose.  I&#8217;m not a huge believer that every use of the &#8220;Haji&#8221; is evil incarnate, showing the racist bigotted views of the military.  Haji-mart to me never meant anything bad, in fact, to me it was a little slice of Eden where one could get 12 seasons of some TV show for like $1 a disc.  (This last trip I purchased Legend of the Seeker, Stargate Atlantis, Sarah Connor Chronicles and Farscape, thus solidifying my nerd credentials.)<\/p>\n<p>The free-speech rights thing strikes me as absurd though.  <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;The government can&#8217;t be charged with deciding what we can and cannot say,&#8221; said Andrew D. Meyer, Bujno&#8217;s attorney. &#8220;There are going to be people who don&#8217;t like a certain message, but that is why there is the First Amendment.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>See, I don&#8217;t really see it that way.  If Sgt Bujno wants to go out to the village green and repeatedly yell &#8220;I See you Haji&#8221; until he is blue in the face, that would be a Free Speech issue.  But my limited understanding of license plates is that they are meant to identify an automobile, not to make some sort of statement.  You have a right to say &#8220;I effen hate the Yankees&#8221; but I wouldn&#8217;t get away with using that as my statement in a public HS Yearbook.  This strikes me as analogous to the argument made by the IVAW dipshits that kept trying to crash the Presidential Debates.  Sure, you have a right to say what you want, but you don&#8217;t have the right to hijack something public to make that happen.  You don&#8217;t have the right to dress up in outlandish gear including a stocking over your head for your drivers license picture, but you certainly have the right to do that if you feel like going to McDonalds looking like a collosal idiot.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m curious what you guys think?  Setting aside whether it is appropriate (which I think is at least arguable) do you guys think that the Gov&#8217;t owes you an obligation to express yourself however you want on your vanity plate, or does it seem that the Gov&#8217;t has a certain obligation to maintain decorum?  The 14th Amendment angle also seems weak to me.  The Gov&#8217;t isn&#8217;t depriving this guy of a license plate, they&#8217;re simply requiring that it meet the standard they set which facially appears to be pretty content neutral.  For instance, I&#8217;m guessing &#8220;ICUHONKY&#8221; would also be verbotten.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve contacted the lawyer and the author of this article in an unrealized attempt to get &hellip; <a title=\"The great ICUHAJI debacle of &#8217;12\" class=\"hm-read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=30069\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The great ICUHAJI debacle of &#8217;12<\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":148,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30069","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30069","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/148"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=30069"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30069\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=30069"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=30069"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=30069"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}