{"id":28040,"date":"2011-12-22T10:24:28","date_gmt":"2011-12-22T14:24:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/valorguardians.com\/blog\/?p=28040"},"modified":"2011-12-22T11:33:09","modified_gmt":"2011-12-22T15:33:09","slug":"steve-snake-eyes-jordan-still-a-fahkin-idiot","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=28040","title":{"rendered":"Steve Snake Eyes Jordan still a fahkin idiot"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

a) It hasn’t been repealed.
\nb) The specific verbal fraudulent claims has ONLY been overturned in the Ninth Circuit and the Tenth is still on appeal.
\nc) Steve Jordan does not live in either the Ninth or Tenth Circuit.
\nd) In all circuits wearing of medals is still violative of the SVA.
\ne) The Supremes will take up the verbal side next year.
\nf) Jordan is not a recipient of the CIB
\ng) Steve Jordan wears the CIB.
\nh) If Jordan could read, which I doubt, he might want to check out US. v Perelman<\/a>:<\/p>\n

By contrast, here, Defendant effectively argues that the First Amendment protects the fraudster\u2019s knowingly fraudulent activity: knowingly wearing a military medal without authorization and with intent to deceive. Whereas \u00a7 704(b) criminalizes pure speech, \u00a7 704(a) criminalizes certain specified
\nactivities4 limited by a scienter requirement. Even if we assume that the intentionally deceptive wearing of a medal contains an expressive element\u2014the false statement that \u201cI received a medal\u201d\u2014the distinction between pure speech and conduct that has an expressive element separates this case from Alvarez. Indeed, in Alvarez, we carefully explained that, while false speech alone is protected by the First Amendment,
\nfraud and impersonation statutes are constitutional because they contain elements \u201cthat assure[ ] us [that] the law targets legitimately criminal conduct.\u201d Id. at 1213. We have no trouble concluding that wearing a military medal with an intent to deceive is engaging in legitimately criminal conduct. Indeed,
\nDefendant did not preserve or bring to us for decision an asapplied challenge to his conviction, most likely in recognition that his own fraudulent activities do not deserve First Amendment protection. In conclusion, we reject Defendant\u2019s argument that our recent decision in Alvarez dictates that \u00a7 704(a)
\nis unconstitutional.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

CONCLUSION:<\/strong> When we find an FBI Agent in New Jersey, and a US Attorney with balls (I am looking at you Paul J. Fishman<\/a>) then Steve Snake Eyes Jordan can do time in Federal Pound Him In The Ass Prison.<\/p>\n

One slight Update:<\/p>\n

Jordan’s only possible defense against the charge was that he didn’t use the uniform or his fake persona to get anything of value. That defense is easily mitigated thanks to Steve himself:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

You will of course note that he uses his experience in the military (he has none) to bolster his private business. Thus, clearly, he is using his CIB to increase his image professionally, and thus is garnering a benefit from wearing the fraudulent uniform.<\/p>\n

This case is slam dunk, we just need the FBI and US Attorney to prosecute.<\/p>\n

UPDATE: Loach makes some good points in the comments about Snake Eyes, suggesting that the new Facebook posts are a clone. I agree they probably are, but this screen cap from his Vampire Profile <\/a>suggests that it predates his outing. So either the time stamp thing is innaccurate, or someone premeditatedly decided to take this dude out.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

a) It hasn’t been repealed. b) The specific verbal fraudulent claims has ONLY been overturned in … Steve Snake Eyes Jordan still a fahkin idiot<\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":148,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28040","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28040","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/148"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=28040"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28040\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=28040"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=28040"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=28040"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}