{"id":27647,"date":"2011-11-24T21:48:24","date_gmt":"2011-11-25T01:48:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/valorguardians.com\/blog\/?p=27647"},"modified":"2011-11-25T12:25:48","modified_gmt":"2011-11-25T16:25:48","slug":"this-is-not-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=27647","title":{"rendered":"This is not news. (Updated)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ok, for the past few years there have been people calling for President Bush to be tried for war crimes. I ignore most of these links because it is the same thing over and over again. But this one is different because there seems to be a court in Malaysia<\/a>. I have never even heard of this group before.<\/a><\/p>\n

A tribunal in Malaysia, spearheaded by that nation\u2019s former Prime Minister, yesterday found George Bush and Tony Blair guilty of \u201ccrimes against peace\u201d and other war crimes for their 2003 aggressive attack on Iraq, as well as fabricating pretexts used to justify the attack. The seven-member Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal \u2014 which featured an American law professor as one of its chief prosecutors \u2014 has no formal enforcement power,<\/strong> but was modeled after a 1967 tribunal in Sweden and Denmark that found the U.S. guilty of a war of aggression in Vietnam, and, even more so, after the U.S.-led Nuremberg Tribunal held after World War II. Just as the U.S. steadfastly ignored the 1967 tribunal on Vietnam, Bush and Blair both ignored the summons sent to them and thus were tried in absentee. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

But it seems that this is going around the internet as if this were real news. The court is not legit and now power to do anything so what they say does not really mean anything. But despite that people seem to believe otherwise in the comments on youtube.<\/p>\n