![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/f35-300x210.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Yeah, back on my favorite flying fiasco. (I know, when they do work as a fighter they work very well.) Bear in mind: the Marine variant costs a cool $94,400,000 (yes, that is almost $95 mill) a pop.<\/p>\n
Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 311, or VMFA-311, at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar in San Diego discovered an array of problems with its Lockheed Martin-made F-35s that ultimately required more than 700 hours of work to fix and wasted more than 169,000 pounds of fuel, the Jan. 7 memo said.<\/p>\n
On Dec. 7, for instance, a plastic scraper was discovered protruding from the wing fold of one of the squadron\u2019s jets, after the jet had flown, the memo noted.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Unless they do in-flight ice removal, that sounds a bit suspicious.<\/p>\n
The memo was written by VMFA-311 commander Lt. Col. Michael Fisher, who described a pattern of \u201cpersistent aircraft delivery discrepancies and premature component failures occurring at Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 311.\u201d Fisher\u2019s memo was approved by Col. William Mitchell, commander of Marine Aircraft Group 11.<\/p>\n
The quality problems and foreign object debris discovered in these five F-35s snarled the Marine Corps\u2019 effort to stand up VMFA-311, nicknamed the Tomcats, as its second F-35C squadron. The jets had total flight hours ranging between 14 and 157, according to the memo, which was sent to the commanding general of the 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing, Maj. Gen. Michael Borgschulte.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
14 hours – doesn’t sound used up unless it’s a one-way weapon .<\/p>\n
Marine Aircraft Group 11 received the F-35s directly from Lockheed Martin\u2019s factory, and VMFA-311 then conducted acceptance inspections.<\/p>\n
All five jets had fuel contaminated with Krytox, a high-temperature lubricating grease, the memo said, and three jets also had metal shavings in their fuel. The jets had to be defueled and refueled two or three times to get the fuel quality up to an acceptable level, with the jets that had metal shavings requiring an extra defueling cycle, the memo added.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Fuel refill\/flushes – 169,000pounds of fuel. Call it just over 84 TONS wasted.<\/p>\n
The seals and segments on multiple jets were not installed correctly, the memo said, and needed to be removed and reorganized.<\/p>\n
And multiple parts in the jets \u2014 including power and thermal management system controllers, electronic units, and an electric-hydrostatic actuator on a jet\u2019s trailing edge flap \u2014 failed, forcing the squadron to remove and replace them, the memo added.<\/p>\n
One jet\u2019s left main gear brake assembly also failed, another fighter\u2019s panoramic cockpit display failed and yet another jet\u2019s backup oxygen system bottle was leaking, the memo stated. All components also needed to be removed and replaced.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is not an all-inclusive list and other component failures have occurred since this report,\u201d Fisher wrote.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Gotta love Lockheed’s response:<\/p>\n
Lockheed Martin said it averages fewer than one missed production quality problem per F-35. The company said it closely monitors the reliability of F-35 parts and works with the joint program office to fix parts that fail early. Lockheed Martin also said parts on the F-35 typically last twice as long as those on fourth-generation jets.\u00a0 Defense News<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
So, Lockheed: is your QA department completely incompetent? Just counting the failures listed is considerably more than one per plane. I know these are hideously complex machines, and in the famous phrase “you cannot inspect in quality”, but this is a 100% fuel system failure alone and a mean time between failures measured in milliseconds.\u00a0 At spitting range of $100 mill per copy, the American government – and taxpayers – should be demanding a hell of a lot better.<\/p>\n
Confession – I worked as a mechanic for several years, and among other things performed pre-delivery inspections on newly shipped 1970s Fiats. Let that sink in – FIATs! And they exhibited fewer flaws than these flying Yugos.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"