![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/07\/illegal-immigrants-texas-300x200.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
After the Title 42 expiration, masses of immigrants were expected to swamp our wide-open borders, right?\u00a0 Not necessarily so:<\/p>\n
Biden stated Sunday that the border looks “much better than you all expected,” after the end of Title 42. He added that he has no immediate plans to visit the border because doing so would “just be disruptive.”\u00a0\u00a0 Fox News<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
And then there is Mayorkas’ version:<\/p>\n
\u201cOver the past two days, the United States Border Patrol has experienced a 50% drop in the number of encounters versus what we were experiencing earlier in the week before Title 42 ended at midnight on Thursday,\u201d Mayorkas said on CNN’s “State of the Union”.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 NBC News<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Wow, how could we have been so wrong?<\/p>\n
\n“Please, go back to Mexico,” a Texas soldier told the group just north of a river dividing El Paso, Texas, and Mexico’s Ciudad Juarez, beneath a bridge that joins the two countries.<\/p>\n
As the migrants trudged up the sandy, trash-strewn riverbank into Mexico, a Guatemalan man said the Texas troops had been clear: “It’s not in our interest to be here.”<\/p>\n
Two dozen National Guard troops quickly set about stretching coils of barbed wire across the cement base of the bridge where the migrants had been.<\/p>\n
Beneath the Ciudad Juarez-El Paso bridge, a Texas National Guard member warned migrants that if they came further into the U.S., they would be deported and barred from applying for U.S. entry for five years.<\/p>\n
New regulation presumes most migrants are ineligible for asylum if they passed through other countries without first seeking protection elsewhere, or if they failed to use legal pathways.\u00a0 Reuters<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Oh, I see – troops blocking border crossing, physical barriers… wonder if they just built a wall whether it would be even MORE effective. Hmm… wonder where we have heard that?<\/p>\n
However, the Biden administration is trying something Trump didn’t – no court dates. Just catch and release, telling them to check in someday. Or giving them real interesting court dates (if they give a court date at all!):<\/p>\n
\nEven as President Biden’s administration is seeking to release migrants<\/a> into the U.S. with no court dates at all, the Department of Homeland Security is already issuing court dates that would allow migrants to set up a whole new life for themselves before appearing at an immigration court to determine whether they should be removed.<\/p>\n
Migrants fresh across the border shared their DHS I-862 forms that display court summons dates three, four and even five years into the future, according to a Monday report from the Washington Examiner. Fox News Digital has also confirmed court dates set for up to five years after a migrant crosses the border.\u00a0 Fox News<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
The article says one Venezuelan immigrant claimed that his mother was given a date TEN YEARS out but that could not be verified.<\/p>\n
\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"