Let me start by saying if you just want to call the IVAW guys traitors etc, please do so on the other link.\u00a0 That said though….<\/p>\n
I have come to the conclusion that no longer can “IVAW member” and “honorable.” Co-exist.\u00a0 Which is not to say I find all of you to be traitors, but I can’t justify in my mind inclusion in a group which most recently elected Matthis Chiroux to your board, and which voted as a body that activities like that of Webb should be protected.<\/p>\n
So, convince me otherwise.\u00a0 How can you tell me that IVAW cares about troops when they failed to elect to the board folks who honestly wanted to help them, while simultaneously tacitly supporting calls for those troops to be attacked, and their equipment sabotagued.\u00a0 Now, I have always believe that IVAW should be listed as a subversive organization, something I have said on several occasions, and I will likely be drafting up a document that encourages the DoJ to look into just such a thing, complete with the proof about Webb’s calls for actions etc.<\/p>\n
So tell me, I know some of you members consider yourself to be honorable, how do you reconcile this self-evaluation with belonging to a group which would take such public positions?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"