{"id":130368,"date":"2022-09-12T06:00:40","date_gmt":"2022-09-12T10:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/valorguardians.com\/blog\/?p=130368"},"modified":"2022-09-09T14:40:10","modified_gmt":"2022-09-09T18:40:10","slug":"personnel-issues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=130368","title":{"rendered":"Personnel issues"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-130371 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/PYIXUECMP5HDRGQRPTPAMYNEDY-300x214.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"214\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/PYIXUECMP5HDRGQRPTPAMYNEDY-300x214.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/PYIXUECMP5HDRGQRPTPAMYNEDY-466x333.jpg 466w, https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/PYIXUECMP5HDRGQRPTPAMYNEDY-768x549.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/PYIXUECMP5HDRGQRPTPAMYNEDY.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Seems like a bunch of minor things &#8211; but this is the kind of things that loses troops to CIVLANT when they could be retained.<\/p>\n<p>The Air Force comes in at the top of the list &#8211;\u00a0 Child care at Eglin is such a problem that since 7th SF moved in, they had to build a day care and the waiting list is still huge, despite an average drive of an hour ONE-WAY. Think of adding 4 hours to a soldier&#8217;s\/airperson&#8217;s (?) day just to take their kid or pick them up.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p class=\"Paragraph-sc-1tqpf5s-0 kEzXdV body-paragraph body-paragraph\">\u201cThis is endemic of the retention and recruiting problem we\u2019re having right now,\u201d said retired Army Special Forces Col. Stu Bradin, president and CEO of the Global SOF Foundation.<\/p>\n<p>Bradin got involved in advocating for a child development center after 7th SFG families approached him for help about three years ago. Recently, the foundation held a video teleconference about the child care issue, expecting around 25 people, he said. He was astounded when more than 500 people took part.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.militarytimes.com\/news\/your-military\/2022\/09\/08\/how-bad-is-the-child-care-shortage-ask-florida-military-families\/\"> \u00a0\u00a0 Military Times<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There&#8217;s relief on the way, but part of it is pay-for-play like Montessori (not cheap) or 5 years off. I know, if the Army wanted you to have kids they would have issued them &#8211; but that attitude has been costing us good troops for at least 50 years I know of.<\/p>\n<p>And again with the AF, now that they are phasing out the Global Hawk they have a bunch of enlisted &#8216;pilots&#8217; who need jobs.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles \u201cCQ\u201d Brown Jr. and Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force JoAnne Bass floated their plan for those airmen in a November 2021 letter. They laid out options for the pilots to commission as officers, which requires a college degree, or to pursue enlisted jobs outside the cockpit like flight engineer, aircraft loadmaster or refueling specialist.<\/p>\n<p>Many waited eight months before they were asked to list their three most preferred jobs. Some were allowed to commission as long as they stayed in the remotely piloted aircraft field, the letter said. One or two others were approved to train into non-RPA jobs.<\/p>\n<p>Over the summer, they received bad news: Many were disqualified for most of the nearly five dozen careers they were offered in lieu of flying the Global Hawk.\u00a0 Most of the positions were in understaffed fields related to information technology or communications, one airman told Air Force Times. They were tailored to early- and mid-career airmen, with few jobs senior enough for those transferring in from the Global Hawk enterprise.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.militarytimes.com\/news\/your-air-force\/2022\/09\/08\/plan-to-give-enlisted-pilots-new-jobs-back-on-track-after-complaints\/\">Military Times II<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Now, let&#8217;s not forget the Army: due to release a new updated Human Resources HR platform, they are kicking the can down the road:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p class=\"Paragraph-sc-1tqpf5s-0 kEzXdV body-paragraph body-paragraph\">The Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army \u2014 otherwise known as IPPS-A \u2014 was originally scheduled to go live across the entire Army in December 2021, before failed systems tests led senior leaders to order a nine-month delay<\/p>\n<p class=\"Paragraph-sc-1tqpf5s-0 kEzXdV body-paragraph body-paragraph\">But the extra time wasn\u2019t enough, despite the Army <a href=\"https:\/\/www.armytimes.com\/news\/your-army\/2022\/05\/20\/ipps-a-rollout-still-on-track-after-initial-delay-army-says\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">declaring in May<\/a> that they were on track, and officials acknowledged that there\u2019s not a new release timeline in place following the latest delay. Army Times <a href=\"https:\/\/www.armytimes.com\/news\/your-army\/2022\/08\/15\/armys-long-delayed-hr-platform-launch-in-jeopardy-again\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">reported Aug. 15<\/a> that another delay could occur after the service scuttled a scheduled shutdown of several older HR systems, with the IPPS-A functional management director acknowledging in a phone interview that a fully functional release wouldn\u2019t be possible for Sept. 20.\u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.militarytimes.com\/news\/your-army\/2022\/09\/08\/deja-vu-armys-21st-century-hr-platform-delayed-again-indefinitely\/\">Military Times III<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Usedtabe contracts had clauses with penalties for non-performance &#8211; looks like government contractors don&#8217;t have them. Nice work if you can get it. (In fairness, the Pentagon is notorious for post-contract changes &#8211; if today they\u00a0 wanted a replacement for a Jeep, by half-way through the build the spec sheet would build a C17.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; Seems like a bunch of minor things &#8211; but this is the kind of things &hellip; <a title=\"Personnel issues\" class=\"hm-read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/?p=130368\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Personnel issues<\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":668,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,187,359],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-130368","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-administrative","category-air-force","category-army"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130368","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/668"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=130368"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130368\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":130372,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130368\/revisions\/130372"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=130368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=130368"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=130368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}