![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Geese-on-Des-Plaines-River-3-4-2016-300x193.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Even though I’m quite tired of the implied threats of all sorts from the Biden (Lack Of) Administration, I’m quite well aware that there is a movement underfoot to deprive US citizens of their 2nd Amendment rights to bear arms. I could bare my own arms, but that’s a different story. And I have yet to see exactly what is meant by “arms”, which is a very loose term not clearly defined in any of that stuff released thus far.<\/p>\n
But before you get your shorts in a bunch, the following stuff is what I found by snooping around on the interwebs.<\/p>\n
Take away the 2nd<\/sup> Amendment? Well, here\u2019s the start of something big, with this first video: some states are declaring themselves sanctuary states, or have already done so.<\/p>\n https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=6VSsZSvWIE4<\/a><\/p>\n This guy goes over Biden\u2019s newby federal law that will wipe out the 2nd<\/sup> Amendment of the US Constitution. He even put page tabs on the printout, to keep track of things, and he’s quite earnest. I give him at B++ for his efforts, but he seems a bit jumpy to me.<\/p>\n https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=-WgWq6ugPD4<\/a><\/p>\n And then, there\u2019s this little gem from the Obama epoch, which bars Social Security recipients from owning a gun for self-protection if they are judged mentally deficient. It\u2019s being revived by the Biden Admin:<\/p>\n https:\/\/socialsecurityintelligence.com\/social-security-gun-ownership\/<\/a><\/p>\n Those disorders or impairments are listed here: https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/cfr\/text\/20\/appendix-1_to_subpart_P_of_part_404<\/a><\/p>\n Note the dates which end the effective periods<\/em>. They are in effect until those dates, which means that the current administration doesn\u2019t need to do anything at all about them. But since those people never do any research of any kind, and just jump on something and pound it, someone should take a bit of pity on them and let them know those impairments listed on 85 FR 78175<\/a> are still in effect and don\u2019t need to be revived. Just don\u2019t bring up the dates of expiration.<\/p>\n Well, what can I say? It\u2019s almost like George III sending his Redcoats over to piss off the colonists in every way possible, isn\u2019t it? Put a stamp on everything printed and collect a tax from it, and call it the Stamp Act. Then see what happens.\u00a0 https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Stamp-Act-Great-Britain-1765<\/a><\/p>\n Stamp Act<\/b>, (1765<\/b>), in U.S. colonial history, first British parliamentary attempt to raise revenue through direct taxation of all colonial commercial and legal papers, newspapers, pamphlets, cards, almanacs, and dice. – Britannica<\/p>\n Of course, we could have another episode like the Boston Massacre, right?\u00a0 https:\/\/www.masshist.org\/features\/massacre\/trials<\/a><\/p>\n Oh, wait – didn’t that kind of happen a few weeks ago in WDC?<\/p>\n I don\u2019t see nuthin\u2019 about owning a sword or archery equipment being illegal, and you know just how much fun it is to hunt deer with a broadsword, don\u2019t you?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"