![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/Protest-for-things-that-mattered-300x298.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Riots and protests are nothing new in human history. The purpose of our most recent encounter with civil unrest was distorted into destruction, looting and pillaging, and no peaceful behavior at all. Some of the businesses that were destroyed may never return to those neighborhoods. It isn’t anything new. The June riots and destruction were appalling, and there was no message in it, other than ‘grab it and shag it outa here’.\u00a0 The real message was lost in destruction. Protests and revolts go as far back into history as humans have been on this planet. There were three marches from Selma, Alabama to Montgomery, and at the last one, law enforcement officers literally attacked the marchers to turn them back. Some months later, the Civil Rights Act was signed into law by LBJ.<\/p>\n
If you’re going to address riots and protests, we can go to the start of the Reformation period in England, because the blame for the whole Reformation business belongs to Henry VIII, who confiscated all Catholic properties (e.g., monasteries and their lands) and revenues so that the Catholic Church could no longer claim those assets for itself. He remained a Catholic, as was his older daughter Mary, but his younger daughter Elizabeth was not. He also imprisoned Thomas Cromwell and later had him executed. Thomas Cromwell was the 1st Earl of Essex, KG, PC (c. 1485 \u2013 28 July 1540) was an English lawyer and statesman who served as chief minister to King Henry VIII of England from 1532 to 1540, when he was beheaded on orders of the King. He was the great-great-grand uncle of Oliver Cromwell.<\/p>\n
And much later, after Elizabeth I (Henry’s longest-lived offspring) had passed and the Catholic Church was again popular in England, Oliver Cromwell took over the government.\u00a0 As a Puritan, he objected to the Roman church’s religious holidays and tried to get rid of Christmas.<\/p>\n
https:\/\/www.historyextra.com\/period\/stuart\/no-christmas-under-cromwell-the-puritan-assault-on-christmas-during-the-1640s-and-1650s\/<\/a><\/p>\n From the article:<\/p>\n In January 1645 the final nail was hammered into Christmas\u2019s coffin, when parliament issued its new\u00a0Directory for the Public Worship of God<\/em>, a radical alternative to the established Book of Common Prayer, which made no reference to Christmas at all. Thus the way was paved for the \u2018anti-Christmas\u2019 of 1645 \u2013 a day upon which, in Taylor\u2019s words, a man might pass right through the parliamentary quarters, and \u201cperceive no sign or token of any holy day\u201d.<\/p>\n The Parliamentarians had abolished the high point of the English ritual year, and the cancellation of Christmas aroused huge popular resentment \u2013 not just in the royalist camp, but in the districts controlled by parliament, too. As early as December 1643, the apprentice boys of London rose up in violent protest against the shop-keepers who had opened on Christmas Day, and, in the words of a delighted royalist, \u201cforced these money-changers to shut up their shops again\u201d.<\/p>\n There were further dark mutterings the next year. On 24\u00a0December 1644, the editor of a pro-parliamentarian news-pamphlet expressed his support for the MPs\u2019 decision to favour the monthly fast over the traditional feast, but admitted that \u201cthe parliament is cried out on\u201d by the common people as a result, with incredulous shouts of \u201cWhat, not keep Christmas? Here\u2019s a Reformation indeed!\u201d<\/p>\n But it wasn\u2019t over just yet: there were the Pro-Christmas Riots during Oliver Cromwell’s time.<\/p>\n Worse was to follow in 1647 \u2013 despite the fact that, on 10\u00a0June that year, parliament has passed an ordinance which declared the celebration of Christmas to be a punishable offence. On 25\u00a0December 1647, there was further trouble at Bury, while pro-Christmas riots also took place at Norwich and Ipswich. During the course of the Ipswich riot, a protestor named \u2018Christmas\u2019 was reported to have been slain \u2013 a fatality which could be regarded as richly symbolic, of course, of the way that parliament had \u2018killed\u2019 Christmas itself.<\/p>\n In London, a crowd of apprentices assembled at Cornhill on Christmas Day, and there \u201cin despite of authority, they set up Holly and Ivy\u201d on the pinnacles of the public water conduit. When the lord mayor despatched some officers \u201cto pull down these gawds,\u201d the apprentices resisted them, forcing the mayor to rush to the scene with a party of soldiers and to break up the demonstration by force.<\/p>\n The worst disturbances of all took place at Canterbury, where a crowd of protestors first smashed up the shops which had been opened on Christmas Day and then went on to seize control of the entire city. This riot helped to pave the way for a major insurrection in Kent in 1648 that itself formed part of the \u2018Second Civil War\u2019 \u2013 a scattered series of risings against the parliament and in favour of the king, which Fairfax and Cromwell only managed to suppress with great difficulty.\u00a0 – article<\/p>\n And lest you forget, not so very long ago, London was literally set on fire in 2011 during race riots, as well as other British cities. The London burning 2011 video is below. Looting, pillaging, destruction of property, street confrontations…. all that sounds familiar, doesn’t it?\u00a0 I’ve never thought anything like this was necessary, but there are always wankers in the crowd who want to destroy “whatever” and steal stuff.<\/p>\n