Category: Military issues

  • Phonies against SEAL author

    I’ve been waiting for a few days to find the context for this email I got the other day from our buddy Don Shipley. With Hondo’s post, I guess it’s about the right time. Don found this phony dude named Robert Crawford who claims to be a SEAL and outraged by Bissonnette’s book about the OBL raid. Mr. Shipley says;

    This bullshit was written by a Robert Crawford who claims to be a SEAL and is NOT listed in the Database… I called him out and he deleted the post but not before I copied it.

    I guess it was posted on some backwater Leftist blog called “Welcome Back to Pottersville” and it’s an open letter to the publisher of Bissonnette’s book.
    (more…)

  • Pentagon to Bissonnette: “See You In Court”

    Looks like the Pentagon is going to play hardball with former SEAL Matt Bissonnette (AKA “Mark Owen”) regarding his book.  The DoD General Counsel reportedly informed Bissonnette yesterday that the Pentagon is considering legal action against him and his publisher to force them to forfeit proceeds from Bissonnette’s upcoming book No Easy Day.

    Looks like Bissonnette should have actually read his Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement, especially paragraphs 3 and 5.  In paragraph 3, he specifically agreed to submit potentially classified manuscripts for prepublication classification review.  (He didn’t.)  And in paragraph 5, Bissonnette agreed in writing to forfeit all proceeds obtained through the unauthorized release of classified information.

    This isn’t any kind of government power grab, or “prior restraint” of any type.  Bissonnette screwed himself here.  He signed a formal, enforceable legal agreement with the government, and he later violated that agreement.  So now he gets the consequences – which were spelled out for him a priori.  He gets no sympathy from me.

  • Manning’s Lawyers Are Whining Again

    It seems that PFC Bradley Manning’s lawyers are whining again.  But this time, it’s not over his treatment.

    No, this time they are objecting to the fact that Army officials seemed more concerned about potential bad publicity than Manning’s comfort and “feelings”.   At least, that’s what I get from this paragraph:

    David Coombs, a lawyer for Pfc. Bradley Manning, argued at a pretrial hearing that prosecutors have yet to turn over about 700 emails in their possession. But he said the emails he’s already aware of paint a portrait of a military more concerned with combating negative publicity than with Manning’s welfare and reveal that high-level officials, including a three-star general, were briefed about the conditions of his confinement.

    Gee, a 3-star General was concerned that the Army might get bad publicity.  I’m shocked, I say – shocked!

    Frankly, I’m not surprised that senior Army leadership is concerned about avoiding bad publicity for the Army.  That’s part of their job.  And I couldn’t personally give a hoot in hell if they were more concerned about protecting the Army than about how Manning was inconvenienced, provided they ensured he was treated humanely – which they did.

    Let me recap a few pesky things called “facts” that Manning’s lawyers don’t seem to want to discuss.  Manning was confined to his cell for 23 hours daily.  So?  Many prisoners who might be at-risk from other inmates (or who are dangerous) are similarly kept isolated.

    Manning was also evaluated as a suicide risk. Therefore, for a period of time at Quantico his clothing was temporarily taken away.  This was done as a protective measure to ensure he didn’t attempt to harm himself with same.  He was later provided with a suicide-prevention smock.

    But for a while, he had to make do with skivvies – and even sleep in them, without his jammies.  Oh, the horror!   The horror!

    Were Manning’s “feelings hurt” by such “terrible” treatment?  Whoop-te-doo.  Personally, I couldn’t give the proverbial flying . . . flip if they were.    Perhaps he should have thought about the possibility that he’d go to prison – and be treated harshly but humanely as a prisoner – before disclosing several hundred  thousand classified documents to persons not authorized to receive them.

    Humane treatment doesn’t necessarily equate to pleasant conditions.  “Three hots and a cot”, adequate shelter, and protection from physical harm or abuse qualifies.  And having to sleep in your skivvies (or naked) because you’re thought to be suicidal and your normal clothing has been taken away to ensure you don’t harm yourself with it does not qualify as abuse.

    Manning didn’t give a damn about how his actions affected the Army or his brothers/sisters in arms – or his country.  So as long as he’s treated humanely, why should anyone in the Army give a rat’s ass whether he’s comfortable or his feelings get hurt?

  • Not Exactly a Surprise

    Welll, the Navy announced today the fate of that ship’s captain who recently managed to get his ship rammed near the Strait of Hormuz. And I have to say the decision wasn’t really a surprise to me:

    The skipper of the USS Porter has been removed from command after his ship collided with an oil tanker just outside the strategic Strait of Hormuz

    The commander of Naval Surface Force Atlantic announced Cmdr. Martin Arriola’s relief of command on Thursday.

    I have zero experience in matters nautical, so I can’t really give an educated opinion on whether or not this was justified.  But as a “landlubber”, well, I do have to say it seems about right to me.

    I hope CDR Arriola has some good plans for life post-Navy.  I’d guess his Navy career has reached it’s apex.

  • Anarchist militia plotted to assassinate Obama

    According to Belfast Telegraph, the four anarchists who happened to be in the military at Fort Stewart, GA who we wrote about last night, were also planning to assassinate the President and take over the government;

    Four US soldiers plotted to assassinate Barack Obama and overthrow the government, a court has heard.

    Prosecutors in Georgia said they formed an anarchist militia within the military.

    It doesn’t sound to me as if they had all of their stuff in one sand bag. They had 1/2 million bucks and wanted to be someone. And here we were looking for right-wing extremists. Thanks SPLC.

    But I guess they had big plans, according to CNN;

    These included “forcibly taking over the ammo control point of Fort Stewart to take the post, bombing vehicles of local and state judicial and political figureheads and federal representatives to include the local department of homeland security, (and plotting) to bomb the fountain at Forsyth Park in Savannah.”

    So, I guess their plans included killing their fellow soldiers to take over the Stewart ammo complex. So I guess that exonerates the rest of us normal people who’ve worn a uniform.

    But, I think after they took over the ammo bunkers, someone might be able to mobilize enough forces against them to prevent bombing a fountain and a dam, as well as their plan to poison the Georgia apple crop like Huffington Post says they wanted to do.

    The two murders they committed were horrific and they certainly deserve punishment for that act, but as far as their intention to take over the world…I think Brain and Pinky had a clearer plan.

  • Koran burners and corpse urinaters to be punished

    Tman sends us a link to the Reuters story that the military is planning punishment for the groups of troops who were responsible for urinating on Taliban corpses as well as some NCOs and officers responsible for the famous Koran incinerations earlier this year;

    The Marine Corps announced three Marines had pleaded guilty to charges over the video, including one for “urinating on the body of a deceased Taliban soldier.” Another wrongfully posed for a photo with human casualties and the third lied about the incident to investigators.

    Also on Monday, the Army announced that six soldiers received administrative punishments over an incident in which copies of the Koran and other religious material were removed from a prison library and sent to an incinerator to be destroyed. Four of the individuals involved were officers and two of them were non-commissioned officers, a spokesman said.

    Yeah, because those are the most important things the military can be concerned about right now.

  • Four US soldiers arrested in terror plot in GA

    SGT K sends us a link to an article in Twin Cities.com which tells of four Fort Stewart soldiers who formed a militia group and committed murder to protect the identification of their organization that a Private funded from a $500,000 insurance policy benefit he got upon the death of his pregnant wife.

    One of the Fort Stewart soldiers charged in the case, Army Pfc. Michael Burnett, also gave testimony that backed up many of the assertions made by prosecutors. The 26-year-old soldier pleaded guilty Monday to manslaughter, illegal gang activity and other charges. He made a deal to cooperate with prosecutors in their case against the three other soldiers.

    Prosecutors said the group called itself F.E.A.R., short for Forever Enduring Always Ready. Pauley said authorities don’t know how many members the
    militia had.

    Burnett, 26, said he knew the group’s leaders from serving with them at Fort Stewart. He agreed to testify against fellow soldiers Pvt. Isaac Aguigui, identified by prosecutors as the militia’s founder and leader, Sgt. Anthony Peden and Pvt. Christopher Salmon.

    All are charged by state authorities with malice murder, felony murder, criminal gang activity, aggravated assault and using a firearm while committing a felony.

    Although I couldn’t find Burnett in AKO (I suspect that he was already out of the Army), I did find the other three and they were all 19-series MOS – which means they were in the armor career field – either tankers or armored scouts. Two were in the same Squadron (a cavalry battalion).

    In a videotaped interview with military investigators, [ prosecutor Isabel Pauley] said, Aguigui called himself “the nicest cold-blooded murderer you will ever meet.” He used the Army to recruit militia members, who wore distinctive tattoos that resemble an anarchy symbol, she said. Prosecutors say they have no idea how many members belong to the group.

    “All members of the group were on active-duty or were former members of the military,” Pauley said. “He targeted soldiers who were in trouble or disillusioned.”

    Anarchists, huh? Well, that is kind of different to what the Department of Homeland Security and SPLC told us. I thought the militias were supposed to be right-wing extremists, like Timothy McVeigh.

  • Farewells for the Fallen

    Stu’s article the other day – the one commenting on and quoting Dr. (COL) Frank’s 2006 Stars and Stripes article – brought to the forefront a memory or two of my own.  And while all memories aren’t necessarily pleasant, they’re all important.

    Like Dr. Frank, I spent some time at Bagram AB.  But unlike Dr. Frank, here I’m not addressing the obvious waste and personal losses inherent in wartime death. Since that was Dr. Frank’s intent his article only briefly mentioned the departure ceremony held at Bagram for the fallen.  His article therefore really didn’t convey the impact of that unique sendoff.  And even many who’ve served in Afghanistan may not have felt that impact; the public ceremony at Bagram is different than any other I’ve seen.

    So I thought I’d try and describe that ceremony, and its impact, a bit more fully. I apologize in advance if I’m not as eloquent as the good doctor.  And I also apologize if anyone finds what follows boring – or if it brings back memories that might be disturbing.  It wasn’t that easy to write, so if you’re having a bad day – well, maybe it’s best to read this another time.  Or not at all.

    Why write this at all?  Dunno.  I guess I thought it was just a natural follow-on to Stu’s article.  Or maybe I just needed to write it.

    While I’m using Army-centric language, there’s no intent to slight any other service.  My background is Army;  I’m simply speaking from a soldier’s point of view.

    ———

    In war, soldiers die.  That is and always has been a universal truth.  IMO it’s likely to remain true throughout mankind’s history. Plato was right.

    Soldiers understand all that.  And although we don’t like to think of it, I believe soldiers accept the possibility of disability or death as a normal, routine risk to an extent not seen in other professions.  We know there’s a good chance we won’t come home from war whole; or, perhaps, not at all.  Soldiers know that a primary product of war is death – ours, or the enemy’s – and that we may easily be the ones who end up dead.

    We understand, far better than most, that there’s no guarantee we’ll see tomorrow’s sunrise.

    Soldiers also understand that death isn’t limited to war.  The profession of arms is inherently dangerous; risk is simply another part of the military environment. Deaths occur regrettably often in peacetime, too – either in training, or from random chance.

    Acceptance doesn’t make such a loss any less painful.  But it does lead to a somewhat different perspective, perhaps, than that of most.  As well as to a more open, straightforward means of dealing with sudden loss.

    Still:  every loss remains painful; closure is required.  So whenever the Grim Reaper visits, virtually all units hold some sort of Fallen Comrade ceremony.

    ———

    Those who’ve been around the military for a while have almost certainly attended a Fallen Comrade ceremony – though the title may have been different.  In the Army the details of the ceremony may vary but in broad outline they’re similar, whether in peacetime garrison or in war zones:  a display of helmet/weapon/dogtags/boots, some words about the deceased, an opportunity to reflect, a brief prayer . . . .  All such ceremonies offer the opportunity to reflect on that absolute truth all of us know, but never like to think about: “There but for the grace of God . . . .”

    I’ve attended a number of such ceremonies over the years; more, frankly, than I prefer to remember.  And even some held in Afghanistan – specifically, those held in Kabul – were much like those elsewhere:  the standard display, the words about the deceased, the prayers, the brief time for reflection . . . and then back to duty.  For the living, duty calls and life goes on.

    But at Bagram, the final goodbye for Fallen Comrades was different. Very, very different.  And in a way that was dramatic, moving – and IMO, uniquely apropos.

    ———

    For those who haven’t been there:  Bagram AB is about 30 miles north of Kabul. It is the primary APOE/APOD for Afghanistan.  Virtually everyone in the military arriving in or departing that country does so through Bagram.

    It’s a base that’s seen much war during the last 35 years.  It was used by the Afghan government in the civil war which started in 1978; by the Russians during their nearly decade-long occupation of/war in Afghanistan, from 1979-1989; and by multiple factions during the more than decade of Afghan civil war which followed.  We took it over shortly after our intervention in Afghanistan began, and have been there since.

    Bagram AB  is oriented roughly southwest to northeast.  In 2007, the base was still rather long and narrow, with essentially one arterial road – Disney Avenue.  Most of the facilities were strung out along or within a couple of blocks of Disney to the east or west.  The runways are to the east of Disney; when I was there in 2007, a large and relatively undeveloped area existed west of the facilities clustered along the western side of Disney.  Things doubtless have changed somewhat since then.

    Bagram AB is also where a US KIA in Afghanistan begins the final journey home.

    I’d guess that units in Afghanistan hold internal, more private and traditional ceremonies for their fallen; my unit was fortunate enough not to have any KIAs while I was there, so we never held one.  However, at Bagram an additional, public ceremony was also held.  I understand it’s still done much the same way today as it was done 5 years ago.

    I’ll describe the Bagram public ceremony, as it was in 2007.

    The ceremony is announced over the base PA system.  The initial announcement tells everyone that a Fallen Comrade ceremony will be held at a future time.  That time may be hours in the future – or minutes.  The announcement is repeated periodically until shortly before the ceremony itself.

    The ceremony itself is very simple, even though it has many “moving parts”.  Every available person on base who can possibly be spared assembles along Disney Avenue. Time of day for such ceremonies is not set beforehand; it’s based on flight availability.   Return of KIA remains are accorded highest priority by CENTCOM, and change USAF mission flight schedules accordingly.  Thus, whenever the ceremony needs to occur, it happens.  0300?  Chowtime?  Mid-afternoon or mid-morning?  It doesn’t matter. Whenever a bird is available to depart and return the remains of those KIA to CONUS, the ceremony is held.

    If you’re not immediately required at your place of duty for operational reasons, you are expected to get yourself down to Disney posthaste and participate.  If you’re military, that means in proper uniform.  Civilians (there were some then, and are some today) wear their normal work attire.

    The assembled group along Disney Avenue is notified that the ceremony is about to begin.  Military assume parade rest; civilians stand quietly and respectfully.

    Near the western end of Disney, a vehicular procession begins.  (Though most of Disney runs generally northeast to southwest, near the south end of base it turns virtually due west – so as I recall, to avoid ambiguity the southern/western terminus is generally referred to as the “west end”.)   The procession begins at Mortuary Affairs

    In 2007, the vehicles used were generally HMMWVs pulling trailers; that may have changed since.  However, the trailers in the processions in 2007 – and presumably they still use trailers today – carry a particularly poignant cargo.

    The trailers carry the flag-draped coffins of US KIAs beginning their final journey home.

    As the procession nears, those lining the road come to attention.  As the procession passes, military personnel salute as a final token of respect to those in the coffins passing by.  Civilians cover their hearts with their hats or hands.  The salute/honor is held until after the last vehicle – with its mournful cargo – has passed by.   Then one returns to attention.

    The procession proceeds roughly a mile or so along Disney Avenue, receiving silent honors from those assembled as it passes.  It then turns east and proceeds to the Bagram flight line.

    At the Bagram flight line, the CG, his staff, and elements of all the units stationed at Bagram are assembled for the final send-off.  They render appropriate honors to those beginning their final journey home as their remains are loaded onto waiting aircraft.

    All remain at attention along Disney Avenue until the ceremony’s end is announced, paying their respects.

    The complete ceremony is recorded on video.  A DVD of the ceremony is made available to the families of the fallen.

    At the conclusion of the ceremony, an announcement is made that the ceremony has ended.  Personnel then return to whatever they were doing prior to the ceremony.

    Yes, it’s a short, simple ceremony.  I’d guess it takes 5 or 10 minutes.

    Yet the ceremony is also incredibly moving and powerful – so powerfully moving that I simply cannot adequately express the impact. It is a correct and dignified way of paying respects to a fallen brother- or sister-in-arms.  I personally cannot conceive of a more fitting farewell for a fallen comrade than for them to pass through a cordon of literally thousands of their peers rendering final honors.  It’s uniquely apropos.

    Standing alongside Disney Avenue, saluting, during one of these ceremonies is something you just don’t forget.

    ———

    On occasion, civilian visitors are present.  And on those occasions the impact of the ceremony on those visitors is particularly noticeable.

    One such ceremony occurred on an August day in 2007.  At the time, the NFL Cheerleading Squad for the Buffalo Bills – the Buffalo Jills – was visiting Bagram AB as part of a MWR tour; my duties also brought me to Bagram that day.   Prior to the ceremony, the Jills were a typically energetic, outgoing group of attractive young women. Indeed, their visit very nearly caused a fight – because during their visit, they’d all been convinced to sign a “Terrible Towel” belonging to an off-duty Pittsburgh Steeler fan.  The owner later very nearly went ballistic when he discovered what his buddies had convinced the Jills to do.

    Not long after the Jills had signed the Terrible Towel, there came the announcement of an immediate Fallen Comrade ceremony.  Immediate, as in 10 or 15 minutes from now.

    Along with everyone else, the Jills proceeded to Disney Avenue.  They stood with the troops, on the east side of the Disney near the entrance to the JOC compound.  I was standing across the road, and could see them clearly.

    That day, a procession of five flag-draped coffins traveled down Disney Avenue beginning their final journey home.

    The ladies from the Buffalo Jills were indeed properly respectful.  But afterwards, their demeanor was changed.  It was obvious that they now realized war wasn’t a “game” being played for dollars and accolades, like the sporting “combat” they were used to observing up close and personal.  And afterwards, they were – for a while, anyway – a much more somber group of women than they had been earlier in the day.

    How much longer, I can’t say.  They left not long afterwards; my duties required me to remain.

    It’s rather hard to forget standing at attention, saluting, on a hot summer day while 5 flag-draped coffins pass by a few feet away.  That’s true even when you’re a hardened-by-life, cynical middle-aged guy who’s seen a number of such ceremonies before, and who didn’t know any of those beginning their final journey home.  I can only imagine what it was like for a bunch of bubbly 20-something young ladies who’d possibly only attended one or two funerals in their lifetime.

    But if I had to guess, I’d be willing to bet that that was the event they will remember most vividly about their time in Afghanistan.  I certainly know it’s something I won’t ever forget.

    Rest in peace, my brothers- and sisters- in-arms.

     

    (Author’s Postscript:  the original version of this article contained a minor error.  It’s been revised to correct that error, as well as to include additional details concerning Bagram’s ceremony not previously known by the author.  Thanks to regular TAH reader TopGoz for the correction and new information.  TopGoz was personally involved in arranging these ceremonies in 2008-2009.  He was therefore privy to information concerning the ceremony I did not have when I wrote the original version.)