Category: Military issues

  • The cost of an F-35

    There’s a reason I was in the infantry, I like to shoot guns and the Army had a lot and free ammo, too. The only thing I know about aircraft are that when I need them, I need them now. I don’t care where they come from, or how they got there just so long as they are there when I need them. That’s why I don’t blog about aircraft.

    Luckily there are bloggers who do care about where aircraft come from and how they got there. Bloggers like Blackfive who goes into the nuts and bolts of the cost of the new F-35 program.

    Apparently, his post has attracted the attention of the House Armed Services Committee who scurried over to the House of Matt to fill in some details. You might want to read it.

  • Navy reverses on gay unions

    At Fox News is the report that Navy leadership has reversed engines on the gay union issue;

    In a one-sentence memo obtained by The Associated Press, Rear Adm. Mark Tidd, chief of Navy chaplains, said his earlier decision has been “suspended until further notice pending additional legal and policy review and interdepartmental coordination.”

    The Navy said its lawyers wanted to do a more thorough review of the legal decision that allowed Navy chaplains to receive training to perform civil unions on military bases, but only in states where gay marriage is legal.

    Apparently, the Navy was surprised that it’s chaplains conducting same-sex unions would be controversial. You’d have thought they would have done a “more thorough review” before rolling out the press release in the first place.

  • Navy Chaplains to Perform Same Sex Marriages in Navy Chapels

    I wanted title this post WTF, but maybe it’s just me and my inner geezer who is confused?

    One version of the story is here.

    Anticipating the elimination of the military ban on homosexuality, the Office of the Chief of Navy Chaplains has decided that same-sex couples in the Navy will be able to get married in Navy chapels, and that Navy chaplains will be allowed to perform the ceremonies — if homosexual marriage is legal in the state where the unions are to be performed.

    For various reasons this seems to be a proverbial ‘cart before horse’ scenario.

    Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.), a member of the House Armed Services Committee, is concerned that, in its haste to “hustle-in homosexuality,” the Navy may be violating federal law – the Defense of Marriage Act.“Offering up federal facilities and federal employees for same-sex marriage violates DOMA, which is still the law of the land and is bound to the duties of our military, including chaplains,” Steve Taylor, communications director for Akin, told CNSNews.com.

    “The administration and various states may be operating as if DOMA doesn’t exist, but the Navy and Marine Corps and all the Armed Services are sworn to obey the law, which this new instruction violates,” he added.

    And DADT is STILL official policy as far as I can tell anyway? The article goes on to say this particular Navy policy change is in preparation for the time if and or when, the overall policy is changed?

    Yep, I’m confused… Geezer or not.

  • The post in which I disagree with American Legion

    Jimmy Foster, the National Commander of the American Legion with whom I’ve hoisted a few shots on occasion has an opinion piece out in which he calls for the release of the death photos of Osama bin Laden.

    Well, Mr. President, the American people paid for those photographs. More than a trillion dollars, in fact, if you factor in the cost of the Department of Homeland Security, two wars, and the care for more than 40,000 veterans who have been wounded in Afghanistan and Iraq

    Is that a measure for justice? In dollars? If that’s the case, why do we need measly photos to satiate our sense of justice.

    President Obama said that “given the graphic nature of these photos it would create a national security risk.” I respectfully disagree.

    Radical Islam creates the national security risk. There were no photographs that prompted the attacks on 9/11, the missile strike on the USS Cole or the bombing of the U.S. Marine barracks in Lebanon. Does anyone seriously believe that the terrorists will hate us less if the photos are not released than they already do now? Will the “death to America “chants that have existed since the Iranian hostage crisis suddenly morph into love sonnets?

    The American people are tired of walking on eggshells to placate a violent ideology that respects neither innocent civilians nor the amazing humanitarian work performed by our soldiers every day. The problem is not blasphemous cartoons or even misguided pastors burning Korans. It’s the people who react with barbarous acts of violence usually inflicted on innocents who had nothing to do with the original “offense.”

    I’m as tired as the rest of the country of ‘walking on eggshells”, but I figure that’s my duty as long as I give our troops some small measure of security in their miserable lives on the front lines of this battle against evil, racist child-murdering scum.

    Sure, it’s utter bullshit that I have to curb my own rights – voluntarily – but if I don’t, I’m not the one who pays in blood.

    The American Legion, does not rejoice at any death. But let us remember what bin Laden has wrought. He is the reason more than 6,000 U.S. military families have buried loved ones lost in combat since 9/11. He is the reason our children are now groped in airports by security officials. He is the reason that the level of mistrust between the overwhelming majority of peaceful Muslims and those of other faiths exists.

    No, we are the reason that we endure all of those things – we made the choice to draw a line in the sand. In my opinion, we were late arriving at that choice by several decades.

    There will be some who doubt the official version of bin Laden’s death whether the photographs are released or not. But not releasing this evidence would surely be adding steroids to these nonsensical conspiracy theories.

    Some say the photographs will bring closure. Others see it as a need to satisfy a thirst for vengeance. I prefer to think of them as symbols of justice.

    Yes, the “deathers” will never be satisfied by releasing or not releasing the photos, but that’s not the reason you want them anyway.

    Again, justice isn’t measured in tangible items like money or photos. The evidence of our victory over bin Laden is all around us – he’s changed us, but we’re still here and he’s not. That’s the evidence of justice in this often-unjust life.

    Perhaps the best argument against releasing the photos is the fact that Washington Post’s Eugene Robinson wants them released;

    Because while gory photographs would have inflamed some jihadists and wannabes, I believe they would have disillusioned and deflated others. A heroic myth of invulnerability had been built around bin Laden. He was supposed to have cheated death while fighting the Russians in Afghanistan, walking tall through fields of fire as the bullets somehow missed.

    Again, that’s fairly cavalier of Eugene who doesn’t have to face eyeball to eyeball those inflamed jihadists on the field of battle. Apparently, he’s more than willing to put our sons and daughters at risk to scare a few who haven’t been frightened by the scads of war p0rn on YouTube.

    The non-believers and “deathers” will never be convinced of whatever it is they don’t believe, anyway. If they want to believe that bin Laden is alive, they’ll come up with several excuses as to why when they call his number, someone in Langely picks up every time.

  • Selective Service resists closure

    Rep. Mike Coffman, R-Colo. tried to shut down the $23 million Selective Service office but met stiff resistance in Congress, according to the Army Times;

    Coffman said he was surprised to learn that legislative jurisdiction over the Selective Service rests not with the Armed Services Committee, which would use draftees, but with the House Financial Services Committee. That panel, primarily responsible for writing tax laws and handling big federal entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, refused to waive jurisdiction, preventing Coffman from offering his amendment to kill the Selective Service.

    Coffman has the unique perspective of being one of the 175 reserve military officers who served in the agency;

    Coffman, who was once one of those reserve officers on loan to the Selective Service, said he continues to believe the agency should be shut down, but it is going to take a little longer than he thought.

    “I still believe we are wasting money on the Selective Service, but shutting it down isn’t going to be quick or easy,” Coffman said.

    Since there is no one brave enough to reconstitute the draft, since no one takes it seriously and register any more, and the all-volunteer military is a complete success, it’s the easiest way to save the taxpayers several million bucks. I don’t know why we cling to this boondoggle, other than as a jobs program.

  • LAAR aircraft pits US company against Brazilians

    The Air Force decided that they needed a slower, more maneuverable aircraft that can loiter longer above the battlefield to support ground troops in the 21st century war against terror. They called this aircraft a light attack and armed reconnaissance (LAAR) aircraft. The Air Force decision to buy the LAAR pits a US company, Hawker Beechcraft, against Brazilian-owned and operated Embraer. By Brazilian-owned and operated, I mean the government of Brazil subsidizes the aircraft company, so the government is essentially the majority stock-holder.

    The Beechcraft submission is the AT-6, a variant of the T-6 training aircraft that the Air Force already uses to train it’s pilots as well as the pilots of foreign allies. So you can imagine how easy it would be to transition pilots from their training into these fighters.

    The Hill says that giving the contract to Beechcraft would add 1400 jobs in 18 states to the economy. On the other hand, awarding the contract to Embraer would only create 50 jobs in the US, but who needs 1350 additional jobs in this economy, right?

    In addition to costing the US some jobs, awarding the contract to Embraer also puts our national security at risk. Brazil has opposed the US in the war against terror, opposed us in attempts to rein in Iran’s nuclear program and in reining in Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva who just left office was a notorious supporter of Iran and Chavez. His replacement, Dilma Rousseff, was a Marxist guerrilla in the 1960s, so you know where her loyalties lay.

    Since Embraer is largely controlled by the State, it’s probably a given that Brazil could hold our national security interests hostage to their whims by interrupting the flow of aircraft and spare parts that the Air Force has determined is critical to their participation in the war against terror.

    According to the Center For Individual Freedom;

    Another troubling item is an unconventional clause in the potential Embraer contract known as the “Golden Share” clause. Under that provision, the Brazilian government would be empowered to shut down the operation at any time during the production or maintenance of the aircraft. Alarmingly, the United States would have no means for recourse on the matter. That’s not very “golden” for American interests.

    Putting that kind of power over that aspect of our national security interests in the hands of a former Marxist guerrilla makes absolutely no sense.

    The Hill also notices a design flaw in the Brazilian craft;

    The AT-6 aircraft is designed to accommodate 95 percent of both male and female pilots safely, while its counterpart, the Brazilian EMB314 is designed to meet older standards that due to weight and size, drastically shrink the population of pilots, particularly female pilots, able to safely fly the aircraft.

    If the Air Force looks more than once at the comparison, there’s something seriously wrong with our acquisition system.

  • Pictures, sorta

    No link here, but Drudge is offering something sold to Reuters.

    If the shithead that sold these pix isn’t prosecuted soonest the conspiracy types WILL have a field day.

    Releasing this kind of info serves no good purpose… except to fill some purse!

  • Next!

    Adam Gadahn should be sweating bullets about now since you can see his bloated carcass from space. Welcome to the number one spot, Adam.

    Jake Diliberto, of Rethink Afghanistan sends us a link to his latest drivel. Aside from giving absolutely no credit to George Bush for last night’s limited victory, he ignores the whole big picture in Afghanistan, as well;

    Bin Laden’s capture occurred in Pakistan not in Afghanistan. This point has significant importance. Mainly, the US has not been using large forces in Pakistan, but the US has 150,000 troops in Afghanistan. Proving two things, having many troops in Afghanistan has done very little to find Al-Qaeda, but a small amount of troops working with international intelligence community does a lot to destroy the global Jihadist networks. The point is small, but it means that the central argument for international cooperation at reducing terrorism needs to reemerge in US national security policy debate.

    Jake, the mission in Afghanistan is not just to destroy al Qaeda, it’s also intended to destroy the climate in Afghanistan that allowed al Qaeda to flourish there. Yes, bin Laden was found in Pakistan and our troops are in Afghanistan…but they’re engaged with the Taliban, ya know the people who sent a twelve-year-old suicide bomber into a market yesterday to open their Spring offensive against the coalition and the Afghan government.

    Are Afghans worth our efforts? That’s up for debate. They have to be as outraged at the tactics being employed against them as we are. Or at least as outraged as they seem to be at us for trying to civilize them. But that’s largely our fault, too, because we left them to their own devices after the Russians withdrew in 1988.

    It’s obvious to me that Jake subscribes to the Joe “Bite Me” Biden employment of robot ninja zombies, which works fine against point targets like bin Laden sleeping in his compound, but not so well against hidden Taliban columns. Folks like Adam Gadahn have to worry about robot ninja zombies, but they’re virtually useless against large numbers of massed forces like those that struck the 173rd at Wanat.

    I know the current thought from the left is that Afghans aren’t worth our time – just like the Left encouraged George HW Bush to let Iraqi columns escape after Kuwait was liberated – and then blamed him when Clinton inherited the Hussein problem.