Category: Military issues

  • On those “special rights”

    Flagwaver and Ben send us a link to an article about a a military court which has found that Marine Sgt. Matthew W. Simmons, a baritone horn player in the Washington DIstrict, was found suitable for continued military service even though he appeared in a gay porn movie in his Marine uniform.

    In some of the clips, he was shown wearing his Marine dress blue coat, complete with decorations and rank insignia; others showed him wearing a Marine physical training jacket. At one point he mentioned on-camera that he was a Marine, and still shots from the videos were used for online advertising, McClatchy reported.

    […]

    He pleaded guilty to charges of misusing his uniform, but in its ruling the court set aside part of those convictions: Because Simmons never wore the complete uniform, there was no “visual evidence” for the general public of his government authority, and even though he identified himself as a Marine, he didn’t say they supported his behavior.

    Now, lets’ look at the story of Michelle Manhart, an Air Force staff sergeant who posed nude for Playboy magazine in 2007;

    Senior Airman Michelle Manhart (born 1976) is a former United States Air Force Military Training Instructor based at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, holding the rank of Staff Sergeant. In January 2007 she was relieved of duty and placed under investigation for posing nude in Playboy magazine.She has since been demoted to Senior Airman, a move which caused her to resign from the Air Force.

    Manhart should have participated in gay sex and maybe she would have been excused for appearing nude.

  • Rumor Doctor: Will the Iraqi government award U.S. troops liberation medals?

    Our buddy, Jeff Schogol, Stars & Stripes’ Rumor Doctor ferets out the answer to the question “Will the Iraqi government award U.S. troops liberation medals?” by going to the source;

    After talking to Iraqi government spokesman Dr. Ali al-Dabbagh, it’s fair to say the answer is a polite “no.”

    The Rumor Doctor mentioned to al-Dabbagh that France and Belgium also issued liberation medals to U.S. troops after World War II.

    Al-Dabbagh replied diplomatically that while Iraqis appreciate U.S. efforts to topple Saddam Hussein’s regime, “I don’t think it is the same situation as we had in Europe.”

    Make sure you read the whole article to get the complete answer.

  • Army to lose 50,000 soldiers in five years

    The Military Times reports that the Army plans to cut 50,000 troops from their ranks in the next five years as their contribution to the $3/4 trillion in cuts from the Defense Department;

    Bostick, the Army G-1, said the pending drawdown initially will focus on the temporary 22,000-soldier increase launched three years ago to support the Afghanistan troop surge.

    These soldiers can be removed from the force primarily through offsets in accessions and retention, sources say.

    The second phase of the drawdown involves 27,000 soldier spaces that were added to end strength during the Grow the Army program, leaving the service with 520,400 active-duty soldiers on Sept. 30, 2016.

    So I guess the next time we go to war, we don’t get to take the Army we want to take, but the one this administration sticks us with…like the one Bush sent to war after the last attack. And, oh, there’s no real evidence that this war has ended. At least after the Cold War we made sure there were no immediate enemies before we sent the troops homes for our “peace dividend”.

    But then this is the administration that uses the Jimmy Carter Administration as it’s example. Carter drew down while we still faced the Soviets in Europe and the communists in Central America.

  • Salon: Repugs boo gay soldier

    One of our PAO fans sent us this link from Salon; “The night Republicans booed a soldier” which describes the incident at the debate last night;

    Fox’s Megyn Kelly said as she introduced a video submission. “It comes from Stephen Hill, who is a soldier stationed in Iraq.”

    Hill, wearing a gray “ARMY” t-shirt then appeared on-screen and told the candidates that he is gay and that he had been forced to lie about his identity when he was deployed to Iraq in 2010 because he didn’t want to lose his job. He then asked if the candidates would “do anything to circumvent the progress that’s been made for gay and lesbian soldiers” now that the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy has been officially repealed.

    His video then ended and … a handful of very loud boos erupted in the debate hall.

    A “handful” of boos equates to all Republicans in the mind of the author, Steve Kornaki, as expressed in the title of the piece. Actually, Rick Santorum addressed the question best;

    …he declared that “any type of sexual activity has absolutely no place in the military,” that gays and lesbians have been given “a special privilege” by the repeal of DADT, and that the basic function of the military has been undermined because of it. Unlike Hill’s question, Santorum’s response produced loud applause and cheers that almost drowned him out as he finished speaking.

    So? What’s the point, Karnacki? Republicans don’t believe in identity politics – it’s Democrats who have split us up into groups based on superficial differences instead of being ablke to embrace our similarities. Santorum is correct in that sex acts of any sort are not compatible with actual military service. Funny how dodging the people who want to kill you occupy your mind enough that you don’t think much about sex.

    And if Private Hill thinks that being gay is a more important part of his identity than being a soldier, he doesn’t belong in the Army. I appreciate his service, but I don’t appreciate the fact that he relishes the opportunity to shove his sexual preference in our face.

    I’m disappointed that dicksmith didn’t take this typical “Made for VetsVoice” story and run with it. Maybe he will later.

  • Choi reenlisting

    According to Politico, Dan Choi is attempting to reenlist in the Army as “vindication” of something or other;

    “Going back to the military will be a vindication,” Choi told POLITICO. [I’m] going back because I fought to go back. The seriousness of our claims was not just political theatre – it was really drawn from our lives. I sacrificed so much so I could go back.”

    In October 2010, he attempted to rejoin the U.S. Army, but has gone back and forth since then. Choi has scheduled appointment with a military recruiter to talk about joining the Army Reserves later this week.

    Really, Dan, you sacrificed? What exactly did you sacrifice? Sanity? Common sense? You brought it all on yourself needlessly.

    I think there’s probably a question on the application for enlistment that asks Choi if he has any unsettled legal matters, to which he’d be required to answer “yes” since his trial in DC was delayed.

    Meanwhile, Choi says that although he is happy with the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell – after all, it allows him to reenlist – the victory is incomplete, something that he doesn’t think is well understood.

    “There is time for some well-intended criticism here – the parties that have been going on. I think they misrepresent the meaning of this event. People who believe that discrimination is somehow all erased will have a rude awakening,” says Choi, pointing out that same-sex spouses will not be extended benefits by the military.

    I hope the Army has the good sense to reject his application regardless of his circumstances. I’d hate to be the squad leader that has to tolerate this piece of shit and his antics. If ever there was someone who didn’t deserve the opportunity to serve this country, it’s Dan Choi.

  • Surprise! Gays want more.

    ROS and VTWoody send a link to an article in the Houston Chronicle which reports that which we knew all along. That the repeal of DADT was not a goal, it was a first step towards the military acceptance of everything related to being gay;

    “We don’t want to be the ones who are the wet blankets of the movement, but at the same time we also want to be the instigators of the movement,” Heather Cronk, managing director of Get Equal, said in a telephone interview from Washington, D.C. “We’ll celebrate for 10 minutes and we’ll get right back to work.”

    Protests, rallies and community conversations were planned by Get Equal on Tuesday in about a dozen cities across the country, including Boston, San Francisco and Laramie, Wyo. Nationwide celebrations marking the end of the policy commonly known as “don’t ask, don’t tell” were also planned by a variety of other groups, including one in downtown Norfolk.

    A handful of protesters organized by Get Equal set up near Naval Station Norfolk before dawn with balloons and signs, including one that said “The repeal of DADT is not enough!”

    Yeah, it’s not enough to have “equal rights” – they want special protections for their lifestyle and rights that won’t be afforded to heterosexuals. They want total acceptance of their deviant lifestyle. Gays want the right to be like mealy-mouthed Dan Choi and punch their subordinates in the chest without retribution and chain themselves to the White House fence in uniform without facing the charges in court.

  • DOD certifies DADT repeal

    Tamn and Jerry920 want you guys to know that the Pentagon has certified that the military is ready for the repeal of the decades-old Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy. Jerry wonders where Dan Choi is today. Well, according to the Global Post, Choi is hoping to go to prison;

    “I want the government to force me to go to jail,” Choi insists. “I’m not going to let them take the easy way.”

    Yeah, I hope he punches someone in the chest in prison. I hope he gets jail time, too, then he won’t be able to enlist in the Army. lord knows there are enough drama queens in the military these days, they don’t need Dan Choi chaining himself to some military front gate to protest pulling guard duty over the holiday.

    And, oh, Choi is now anti-war, according to that article in the Global Post, so the IVAW can look forward to him joining them soon, I suppose.

    But, anyway, where are the thousands of gays who wanted to serve in the military but couldn’t because of their conscience? They should be lined up around the block at your local recruiters’ office. Can you see them?

    Stars & Stripes Leo Shane laments that it’s decision for gays and lesbians to decide whether they want to come out of the closet or not.

  • The New York Times’ James Dao and Mary Williams Walsh eat a big steaming bag of dicks

    Yeah, if you want to piss me off early in the morning, all you have to do is compare military retirement to social welfare programs like James Dao and Mary Williams Walsh did in the New York Times this morning;

    As Washington looks to squeeze savings from once-sacrosanct entitlements like Social Security and Medicare, another big social welfare system is growing as rapidly, but with far less scrutiny: the health and pension benefits of military retirees.

    Yeah, I understand that many of the recipients of Social Security and Medicare paid tens of thousands of dollars each into those programs, but, then they’re not “social welfare programs” in the traditional sense of the word. And military retirement isn’t either. There are scads of Social Security and medicare recipients who haven’t paid in a penny into the system. You fucknuts need to find something else to compare to military retirement benefits.

    Is the retirement that autoworkers or teamsters get from their respective unions social welfare programs? Then neither are retirement benefits from the military.

    But the idiots on whom they’re reporting are just as stupid;

    Advocates of revamping the systems argue that they are not just fiscally untenable but also unfair.

    […]

    Those critics also argue that under the current rules, 83 percent of former service members receive no pension payments at all — because only veterans with 20 years of service are eligible. Those with 5 or even 15 years are not, even if they did multiple combat tours. Such a structure would be illegal in the private sector, and a company that tried it could be penalized, experts say.

    “It cries out for some rationalization,” said Sylvester J. Schieber, a former chairman of the Social Security Advisory Board. “Why should we ask somebody to sustain a system that’s unfair by any other measure in our society?”

    Unfair? Unfair for whom? You idiots who didn’t retire from the military at 20 years? What’s unfair is making a promise with no intention of keeping up your end after the intended recipient has contributed his part.

    And, oh, by the way there are scads of us who didn’t finish twenty years and are still retired, so don’t toss out that unfair canard without doing a little research first.

    A wild-card factor in the debate is the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, which some experts say could avoid the stigma of cutting benefits while troops are at war.

    “The fact that you are getting out of Iraq and Afghanistan does make it easier,” said Lawrence J. Korb, a senior Pentagon official in the Reagan administration who was a co-author of a recent proposal for reducing the cost of military health care. “When the war in Iraq was in terrible shape, it was hard to get people to join the military, and no one wanted to touch any military benefits.”

    Oh, yeah, that way the nimrods won’t look like they hate the troops engaged in combat. I’ve got news for you…there’s going to be another war, you’re going to need the troops again, so no matter what you do between wars to stigmatize service will still rub off on your creamy smooth pale skin.

    And now insult me by comparing me to state and municipal employees;

    Last year, for every dollar the Pentagon paid service members, it spent an additional $1.36 for its military retirees, a much smaller group. Even in the troubled world of state and municipal pension funds, pensions almost never cost more than payrolls.

    “Almost never?” That means that there instances of pensions costing more than payroll, so why say it? And, by the way, state and municipal employees go home every night to their families and never spend a night away from home without recompense. They don’t sleep on the ground for months, pick ticks out of the crack of their asses, sit on scorpions, fight off herds of monkeys in the dark and any number of other things that are almost a daily inconvenience to the troops…things that would have state and municipal employees running screaming for their union rep.

    If you want people who will put up with the shit that soldiers put up with, there’s a price you have to pay for that type of person. Calling that price “unfair” after the fact is petty and small and proves that with all of your vast experience, you know nothing about that which you are speaking.

    “At some point, the cost pressures by the retirement benefits will really start to impede military capabilities.”

    Not like having a hollow force will.