Category: Media

  • So which is it?

    There was a time when a normal person could pick up a newspaper and just read the news. That doesn’t seem to be the case anymore. Just to find the real news, a person these days has to do his own research among several different sources. That struck me hard this morning when I read the Washington Times and then the Washington Post which told the same story, but under two different headlines.

    The story was about Prince William County’s decision to extend their authority for local police to check the citizenship status of people they arrest. The headline for the Washington Times was “Prince William stiffens crackdown on illegals” as opposed to Washington Post’s “Prince William Softens Policy on Immigration Status Checks“. They both tell the same story, report the same facts, yet they come up with two vastly different headlines.

    So which is it? Was it stiffened or softened? As near as I can tell, it’s neither. The Times says;

    The Prince William Board of County Supervisors last night approved an addition to its 2-month-old crackdown on illegal immigrants, considered one of the most aggressive in country.

    With the board’s decision, county police can verify the immigration status of anyone they arrest, even for minor infractions such as speeding or jaywalking. Before, they needed probable cause to think the person was in the country illegally.

    The Post writes;

    The Prince William County supervisors abolished a key part of the county’s illegal-immigration policy last night by directing police officers to question criminal suspects about their immigration status only after they have been arrested.

    In October, the Board of County Supervisors directed officers to check the legal status of crime suspects, no matter how minor the offense, if they think the person might be in the country unlawfully.

    “The basic policy is fundamentally the same. We just changed the way it’s implemented,” Supervisor Martin E. Nohe (R-Coles) said.

    I don’t know how two reporters can go to the same event, come away with the same story, yet two editors who don’t even attend come up with radically different headlines. It’s no wonder that people turn to alternative media sources.

  • Jeremiah Wright at the National Press Club

    I read over at Michelle Malkin‘s, and later at Ace Of Spades, about Jeremiah Wright’s impending speech at the National Press Club for an “NPC Breakfast”. Michele had links to the Free Republic‘s intention to protest there, so I packed up my cameras and headed over there.

    It rained the whole time the Free Republic was outside the National Press Club which probably dampened participation as well. But five stalwarts showed up;

    This gentleman (excuse me for not getting his name) is from Miami and he happened to be in town for another protest and decided to join the FReepers at the National Press Club. His group is Shalom International and he wanted me to tell my readers in the Atlanta area that they’ll be protesting at the Carter Center, Sunday, May 4th;

    While we were waiting for the crowd to let out, I listened to Wright on CSPAN radio. I couldn’t take notes, of course, because I was standing in the rain, but here’s what I heard; the standard anti-war leftist line.

    Somehow he gets moral authority in the discussion because he “sent” his god-daughter to Iraq. I’m pretty sure a minister of a church has alot of god-children, and it stands to reason at least one of them would end up in Iraq sooner or later. But, I’m pretty sure he brought it up to contrast it with the fact that the president’s daughters aren’t in the military because right after he estabished his moral authority by recounting the fact that the woman went to Iraq, he made a point of telling us that rich people use their influence to avoid the war.

    Influence? I wouldn’t call it using influence when your children make the choice to not join the military. I think Wright got confused with the Vietnam when there was a draft and the anti-war Left accused the affluent of avoiding the draft.
    But, from what I heard on the radio, it got thunderous applause from the assembled crowd.

    To the media’s credit, they at least interviewed the FReepers. But I’ve learned that interviews don’t necessarily mean exposure.

    I interviewed Jeff Gannon when he came out (my camera was dying in the rain so the FReepers taped it for me and promised to send me a copy later) and he told me that his impression of the speech was similar to mine. Gannon also claims that Wright made up some of his Bible quotations – I didn’t hear that, but I’ll let the theologians wrestle with it.

    W ell, the crowd came out and they were in rare form. Here’s an example of the type of crowd that was in there;

    That’s Marion Berry, getting in the car, if you don’t recognize him. Jeff Gannon told me that the crowd included Cornell West, the radical black “historian”, several radical Black theologians and whole lot of people I don’t recognize;

    Wright had worked the crowd pretty good by the time they came out. In this video, a woman shouts at our new Jewish friend from Miami “Long live Palestine”. At about a minute and fifteen seconds into the video, another gentleman makes a karate-like kick at the guy from Miami and then again at about a minute and forty seconds.

    [youtube _pkD9P8vbrw nolink]

    Some elderly Black women pulled Cobie (the big Black FReeper) to the side and tried to change his mind about which side he was on. Cobie, a Navy veteran, Gathering of Eagles member and Veterans for Freedom founder, wasn’t convinced. Another Black man tried to argue with Kevin the other Black FReeper, and that didn’t work either.

    Apparently, the media and the attendees were more concerned about the Black men who were protesting Wright’s hateful talk than with the old white guys who were there. I guess they were all a bit surprised that there are Black people who don’t conform to the prevailing opinion based purely on their race.

    People talk about how brave Wright is for speaking his mind, it doesn’t take bravery to parrot the standard line, Kevin and Cobie were the bravest two people on that sidewalk this morning for sticking to what they believe in the face of the biases of the spittle-slinging mad dogs who just applauded on cue to the weakly hidden racist remarks of an opportunist who found a way to bamboozle his flock.

  • It’s not a long trip

    Lawyers for Guantanamo prisoners are concerned that confinement is driving the poor dears crazy according to the International Herald Tribune;

    Next month, Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a Yemeni who was once a driver for Osama bin Laden, could become the first detainee to be tried for war crimes in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. By now, he should be busily working on his defense.

    But his lawyers say he cannot. They say Hamdan, already the subject of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, has essentially been driven insane by solitary confinement in a tiny cell where he spends at least 22 hours a day, goes to the bathroom and eats all his meals. His defense team says he is suicidal, hears voices, has flashbacks, talks to himself and says the restrictions of Guantánamo “boil his mind.”

    “He will shout at us,” said his military defense lawyer, Lieutenant Commander Brian Mizer. “He will bang his fists on the table.”

    So how do they know he wasn’t completely unbalanced before he was put in Guantanamo? After all, he was driving a wanted criminal around the Middle East and engaged in sociopathic behavior long before he was captured. And what do they want us to do with him? Give him weekend passes unsupervised in Miami?

    They claim that isolation in Guantanamo is worse than isolation in US prisons – how is that even possible? There are no degrees of isolation – there’s only isolation. Having spent a little time in isolation in a foreign prison myself, I have some experience in that.

    Since it’s a lawyer’s job to get their client out of prison, I hardly blame them for yapping nonsense – I blame the media for giving them a bullhorn.

  • McCain and GOP differ on Wright

    The Washington Times reports that John McCain and the GOP are battling over how much the Jeremiah Wright pertains to the race for the presidency;

    Mr. McCain has grown increasingly infuriated by the North Carolina Republican Party’s decision to run a television ad next week in advance of the state’s May 6 primary calling Mr. Obama “too extreme” because of his connection to Mr. Wright. The ad includes a clip of one of Mr. Wright’s sermons in which he calls on God to condemn America.

    Yesterday, after his campaign spent two days trying to persuade the state party’s chairman to cancel the ad, Mr. McCain’s anger boiled over.

    “The Republican Party of the state of North Carolina is dead wrong,” he said on CBS’ “The Early Show.” “I’ll do everything in my power to make sure not only they stop it, but that kind of leadership is rejected.”

    Although I agree that Wright’s extremist rants are a legitimate reason to vote against Obama, and I agree that Americans should know about this man that has influenced Obama’s poltics and views over the last 20 years, I also think that McCain is right. While we should all be discussing this horrid man and his potentially dangerous views, I don’t think it’s something a Presidential campaign should have as it’s focus.

    Let Clinton and Obama roll around in the mud while the Republicans stay above that intramural fray. The media should be asking questions – that’s their job. But lately all the media do is print campaign fliers from the Democrats – especially Obama – as if that’s all we need to know.

    McCain shouldn’t have to lower himself to level of the Democrats and the media should do their job – instead of manufacturing stories about McCain’s affairs and whether his birth in Panama should disqualify him as president.

  • LA Times; hatin’ on McCain

    Earlier today, I wrote about the Washington Post having only McCain’s temper to use against him. Well, the LA Times found a little nugget they thought would turn the people against McCain, too. Apparently, John McCain gets a pension because he retired from the military;

    When McCain released his tax return for 2007 on Friday, he separately disclosed that he received a pension of $58,358 that was not listed as income on his return.

    On Monday, McCain’s staff identified the retirement benefit as a “disability pension” and said that McCain “was retired as disabled because of his limited body movements due to injuries as a POW.”

    McCain campaign strategist Mark Salter said Monday night that McCain was technically disabled. “Tortured for his country — that is how he acquired his disability,” Salter said.

    Certain types of military and veterans pensions are either partially or completely tax-exempt, depending on the seriousness of the disability. In McCain’s case, the exemption is 100%.

    Yeah, he got a disability retirement – that’s why it’s 100% tax free. Just like the disability insurance payment that anyone else could get if they had private disability insurance. But service members can’t legally purchase disability insurance, so we get our disability pension tax free.

    So the LA Times went out to find someone to question McCain’s health;

    McCain has twice developed melanoma, a potentially deadly form of skin cancer.

    The fact that he is legally designated with a disability pension may raise further questions.

    “It is a legitimate question to ask about the commander in chief: Is he fit to serve,” said Robert Schriebman, a senior Pentagon tax advisor and tax attorney who recently retired as a judge advocate for a unit of the California National Guard.

    If McCain can hike across the Grand Canyon, then why should he be getting disability payments from the government that are tax-exempt, Schriebman asked.

    Well, let me see if I can explain this so the class warriors can understand it;  if you’re a truckdriver with the good sense to buy disability insurance and you went blind and couldn’t drive your truck anymore, your disability insurance would pay you a tax exempt pension for the rest of your life, regardless of your ability to do something other than drive a truck. You could get a job working with a computer that pays more than you would have made driving a truck, and you’d still get your disability payment from the insurance company because you can’t do the job you had when bought the insurance.

    Other people who retire from the military and get rated as disabled don’t get their whole pension tax exempt because of the varying degrees of their disability. I’ve got a disability rating of 10% which pays me a whopping $117/month that’s tax exempt – but that $117 is deducted from my Army pension and then paid to me by the VA, so essentially, I pay my own disability.

    Now, John McCain couldn’t legally buy disability insurance when he was a military pilot, so the government makes up for that by giving him a suitable pension under the same circumstances every other American enjoys. Even though he can be a politician, he can’t be a military officer anymore.

    I was just a sergeant first class who sold insurance for a few years and I understood the whole process well enough to explain it to you. I find it hard to understand why the LA Times couldn’t take the time to tell you the whole story, too.

  • All they have is McCain’s temper

    mccain-angry.jpg

    The media has dug deeply into McCain’s background and they only thing they can dredge up is his temper. The Washington Post ran a front page opinion piece disguised as news Sunday titled “McCain; A Question of Temperament” that makes him out to be some kind of wild-eyed nutjob. And, of course they can find plenty of witnesses to support their contention that he’s too dangerous to be in the White House;

    Since the beginning of McCain’s public life, the many witnesses to his temper have had strikingly different reactions to it. Some depict McCain, now the presumptive Republican nominee for president, as an erratic hothead incapable of staying cool in the face of what he views as either disloyalty to him or irrational opposition to his ideas.

    […]

    Former senator Bob Smith, a New Hampshire Republican, expresses worries about McCain: “His temper would place this country at risk in international affairs, and the world perhaps in danger. In my mind, it should disqualify him.”

    Of course that’s hyperbole writ large – only in the movies do people get so mad they blow up the world – but then they’re playing to the segment of our society that confuse movies with reality. Well, today, since the Sunday article didn’t generate much outcry, they tried it again. Michael Gerson writes in the Post “McCain’s Anger Management“. Gerson’s evidence of McCain’s temper?

    His 1999 autobiography relates how, as an angry 2-year-old, he would hold his breath until he lost consciousness — the kind of family lore with the ring of truth.

    Of course we all know how most 2-year-olds are rational beings not given to temper tantrums. John McCain seems to be the exception.

    It seems to me that if John McCain was such an insane, irrational, ranting wildman, there’d be an arrest record, but sadly, for the media, there isn’t. However, I could probably dig up an arrest record on some Democrats who are truly insane. Congressman Jim Moran, who has been arrested for drunken brawling in his district, comes to mind, but the Post backs his candidacy every year as he runs for office across the Potomac in Virginia.

    But John McCain held his breath until he passed out when he was two, so that’s much worse.

  • New York Times’ keen sense of the obvious

    20generals_span.jpg

    At the Weekly Standard Blogs, Michael Goldfarb delves into an 11-page article in the New York Times which exposes that *gasp* retired generals who appear on our news programs know people at the Pentagon;

    To the public, these men are members of a familiar fraternity, presented tens of thousands of times on television and radio as “military analysts” whose long service has equipped them to give authoritative and unfettered judgments about the most pressing issues of the post-Sept. 11 world.

    Hidden behind that appearance of objectivity, though, is a Pentagon information apparatus that has used those analysts in a campaign to generate favorable news coverage of the administration’s wartime performance, an examination by The New York Times has found.

    NYT quotes some analysts who feel they were manipulated by the Pentagon but then there are others;

    The Pentagon defended its relationship with military analysts, saying they had been given only factual information about the war. “The intent and purpose of this is nothing other than an earnest attempt to inform the American people,” Bryan Whitman, a Pentagon spokesman, said.

    It was, Mr. Whitman added, “a bit incredible” to think retired military officers could be “wound up” and turned into “puppets of the Defense Department.”

    Many analysts strongly denied that they had either been co-opted or had allowed outside business interests to affect their on-air comments, and some have used their platforms to criticize the conduct of the war.

    I suppose the New York Times would prefer that these experts on military policy would be removed from the events they’re explaining to us giving us dated opinions separated from actual facts. Goldfarb summarizes;

    The piece goes on for some ten pages, with one damning revelation after the next.The Pentagon distributes talking points, provides special access to retired generals, and even arranged a meeting for them with the Secretary of Defense. You’ll also be very surprised to learn that many retired generals have business interests in the defense industry.

    Next they’ll be reporting that our troops are actually required to use real bullets in firefights with the enemy.

  • Iowahawk warned us

    Back in January, Iowahawk tried to warn us about the trend of journalists who’d reached the end of their ropes, snapped and turned to a life a crime. In Bylines of Brutality he wrote;

    A Denver newspaper columnist is arrested for stalking a story subject. In Cincinnati, a television reporter is arrested on charges of child molestation. A North Carolina newspaper reporter is arrested for harassing a local woman. A drunken Chicago Sun-Times columnist and editorial board member is arrested for wife beating. A Baltimore newspaper editor is arrested for threatening neighbors with a shotgun. In Florida, one TV reporter is arrested for DUI, while another is charged with carrying a gun into a high school. A Philadelphia news anchorwoman goes on a violent drunken rampage, assaulting a police officer. In England, a newspaper columnist is arrested for killing her elderly aunt.

    And he formed a not for profit organization and a public service message to inform the public of this scourge;

    2206776011_934651cc25_o.jpg

    And yet the problem continues according to Confederate Yankee;

    Today, another media victim has apparently cracked under the pressure in my own backyard. Well, not literally my backyard, but close:

    Eric Ralph Watson, 34, of 201 Old Grove Lane in Apex, was charged with one count of secret peeping. He was arrested shortly after 6 a.m. in the Brittany Trace subdivision, about a mile from his home.

    Yet another from Bostonmaggie;

    CNN personality Richard Quest was busted in Central Park early yesterday with some drugs in his pocket, a rope around his neck that was tied to his genitals, and a sex toy in his boot, law-enforcement sources said.

    Quest, 46, was arrested at around 3:40 a.m. after a cop spotted him and another man inside the park near 64th Street, a police source said.

    Well, CNN should have known better than to hire a guy with a gay porn star name anyway.