Category: Legal

  • Corrine Brown indicted

    Corrine Brown indicted

    Corrine Brown

    Roll Call reports that Corrine Brown, the ranking member of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee, along with her chief of staff, Elias “Ronnie” Simmons have been indicted in Florida;

    The Florida Democrat and Elias “Ronnie” Simmons were charged with 24 counts, among them mail and wire fraud, theft of government property, and filing false tax returns.

    Brown faces up to 357 years in prison, a fine of up to $4 million and three years of supervised release. She pleaded not guilty on all counts Friday.

    Bail for the congresswoman and Simmons was set at $50,000, which they must pay only if their release terms were violated.

    A trial is expected in the fall.

    Roll Call also reports that she stepped down from her position on the committee.

    Brown said that “due to House rules,” she is temporarily stepping down “to avoid potential distractions from the important work of this committee,” and she noted her work on homeless veterans, women’s issues and healthcare.

    Maybe the committee can get something done with her gone now. I doubt it, but there’s hope.

    Updated 7-11-2016 from WFTV;

    Brown likened her situation to the recent police shooting deaths of two black men in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and St. Paul, Minnesota, and the deaths of five Dallas police officers during a protest march Thursday night.

    “Last week was very rough,” Brown wrote. “Two black men were needlessly gunned down by police; five Dallas police officers were slain by a demented man; and on Friday I had to appear in federal court.”

    Calling the indictment “very scary,” Brown said her “spirit remains unbroken.”

    “My conscience is clear because I’m innocent,” she wrote. “I’m not the first black elected official to be persecuted, and, sad to say, I won’t be the last.”

  • How . . . Convenient

    Headline says it all.

    FBI didn’t record Clinton interview,
    did not administer sworn oath

    I don’t recommend reading the article if you have blood pressure issues and are having a bad day in that respect.

    “It’s beginning to look a lot like whitewash
    Done this regime’s way . . . .”

     

    (And yes – the omission of the “Government Incompetence” tag for this article was intentional.)

  • Seventh Circuit Judge: Constitution has “absolutely no value”

    Seventh Circuit Judge: Constitution has “absolutely no value”

    Posner, Richard 08-10

    Dave sends us a link to the Washington Times which tells the last chapter of the Richard Posner story. Posner is a judge on the Seventh Circuit Court. Posner wrote in the pages of Slate that judges spend too much time paying attention to the US Constitution;

    I see absolutely no value to a judge of spending decades, years, months, weeks, day, hours, minutes, or seconds studying the Constitution, the history of its enactment, its amendments, and its implementation (across the centuries—well, just a little more than two centuries, and of course less for many of the amendments). Eighteenth-century guys, however smart, could not foresee the culture, technology, etc., of the 21st century. Which means that the original Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the post–Civil War amendments (including the 14th), do not speak to today

    I guess we can just disregard the fact the government derives it’s authority from the Constitution and many of our basic human rights are protected from an overarching government in those words. That the state of our human rights aren’t dependent on fickle cultural norms.

    Of course, he could be setting himself up for a nomination to the Supreme Court – he sounds like someone that the current or next President would love to nominate.

  • Supreme Court won’t rule on gun bans

    AFP reports that the Supreme Court declined to listen to challenges to Connecticut and New York laws that specifically ban scary black guns in those states.

    The US Supreme Court on Monday effectively upheld state bans on military-style assault weapons, declining to hear a challenge to bans on guns like the one used to kill 49 people in Orlando earlier this month.

    The challenge was brought by gun rights advocates seeking to overturn bans on assault weapons passed by Connecticut and New York after the 2012 killing of 26 people at an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut.

    Good. The 10th Amendment lives. If the people who live in those concentration camps want to change the laws, let them do it through their legislatures. If they don’t like how their elected representatives voted to take their rights away from them, let them toss the bums out on the street.

    If they are unable to toss their delegates out, they can always move to Vermont or another state that doesn’t sneak up on them in the middle of the night to steal their guns from them. We still have the freedom to do that (for now).

    I don’t like judges who legislate from the bench, and given the current and the future make up of the Supreme Court, I don’t trust those who are left to vote my way. – and probably won’t be good for any of us for this clown car ride to hand down dictates from the bench.

  • “Follow the Money.”

    We’ve all heard rumors of Clintoon’s . . . interesting financial dealings.  And we’ve heard rumors that her campaign has received money from overseas donors who aren’t US expatriates – which would in general be against US election laws.

    Well, how much are we talking about?  Glad you asked.

    According to Zero Hedge, maybe 20% of her campaign funds – from that liberal democracy called “Saudi Arabia” alone, according to the Saudi Crown Prince.   And that doesn’t include possible other foreign “donations”.

    Well, what about while she was SECSTATE?  Did the Clintoon Foundation receive any foreign donations then that might be questionable during that time frame?

    Glad you asked about that, too.  It seems that the Clintoon Foundation has recently revised its Federal income tax filings for the period 2010 to 2013 three times – with two of those revisions occurring within the past 8 months.

    The last revision was in January of this year.  And it included a curious addition:  a new line of text stating that “All other government grants came from foreign governments.”

    The text appears on each of the 4 years Federal tax returns.  The amount apparently referenced by that line?  Oh, a mere pittance – “only” $17.7M per year.

    Interestingly, while the Clintoon Foundation’s tax filings were updated in January to show the above foreign donations, the Clintoon Foundation website still doesn’t reflect that fact.  Go figure.

    Yeah, nothing to see here, folks.  Just more      apparently corrupt wheeling and dealing        business as usual for the Clintoons.

    Now, maybe I’m just unduly suspicious.  But to me, it certainly sounds like either “pay for play” or “payment for services rendered”.  And I’d love to hear the Clintoon’s explanation regarding the Saudi Crown Prince’s claims.

    Still:  the money is good.  Nice work if you can stomach it I guess.

  • Scruff Face loses on appeal

    Scruff Face loses on appeal

    Jesse Ventura's big fucking mouth

    Richard and Chip send us links to the latest chapter to the “Scruff Face” story. An appeals court has tossed out the $1.8 million judgement in the case of Chris Kyle and Jimmy Janos AKA Jesse Ventura. Kyle claimed in his book that he had knocked out Janos in a bar fight after Janos was disrespectful towards a fallen SEAL.

    The Miami Herald explains;

    A key issue in the appeal was whether Kyle acted with “actual malice,” a demanding legal standard laid down by the U.S. Supreme Court in the landmark Times v. Sullivan case in 1964. It means a plaintiff who’s a public figure must prove that a defendant knew that the statement in question was false or made it with reckless disregard for whether it was false. Kyle’s estate argued that the judge gave the jury faulty instructions on that point.

    A separate issue was the $1.3 million award for unjust enrichment. Ventura’s attorneys argued that “American Sniper” shot to the top of the best-seller lists only because Kyle’s statements about Ventura thrust him into the national spotlight. The Kyle estate argued that no other court had awarded damages for unjust enrichment for allegedly defamatory speech.

    The majority of the three-judge 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel says that portion of the entire case fails as a matter of law.

    The majority also vacated the defamation award, but sent that portion of the case back to court for a new trial.

  • More “Good News” for Ms. Clintoon

    We now have a couple more news items related to the Clintoon email scandal.  And as usual, for “the ‘Wonder Woman’ of Benghazi” (e.g., you wonder what in the hell she’s been smoking every time she talks about Benghazi), the news isn’t at all good.

    First:  it seems the State Department IG will shortly release its investigative report concerning the Clintoon email issue.  It says that Clintoon (1) knowingly disregarded DoS email policy while serving as SECSTATE by using a private email server for public business without proper authority; (2) that her private email server was effectively unsecured and was attacked on at least one occasion; and (3) failed to turn over official records to the government as required by law on departing office.

    In short, it says pretty much exactly what I’ve been saying here previously – less the potential criminal aspect of the conduct.  However, there’s a good reason the State Department didn’t cover that part.  That aspect is doubtless being examined in detail as part of the FBI’s ongoing and parallel investigation into the same issue.

    But don’t take my – or the media’s – word for it.  Read the DoS IG report for yourself here.

    Second:  in a separate but related matter, the hacker “Guccifer” pleaded guilty in Federal court the other day to two counts of computer crime.  This is the same guy who claimed that he’d broken into Clintoon’s effectively unsecured email server – the same server later determined to have stored over 2,000 classified items, some at the TS/SAP and/or TS/compartmented level.

    This also isn’t exactly good news for Ms. Clintoon.  Why?  Because apparently Guccifer made a plea deal which requires him to cooperate with Federal LE authorities concerning his hacking activities.  I’m guessing that hearing about that deal did not exactly “make her (Clintoon’s) day”.

    Hmm.  Wonder how Ms. Clintoon looks in black & white stripes?  Or an international orange jumpsuit?

  • Lundin v. Teti

    Lundin v. Teti

    Joe Teti

    We have a fairly long history with Joe Teti, the reality show personality on Discovery Channel’s Dual Survival program. We published his records about three years ago, he went nuts on us a few weeks later. It all began because David Canterbury, Lundin’s co-personality on the show was fired because of lies about his military service and experience. Before we published Teti’s records, I talked to him for an hour or so on a Sunday. He kept reminding me that he was a “star’ and that I should tread lightly. His problem, of course, wasn’t with what I wrote, but rather what everyone else wrote about him in the comments. Mostly, he didn’t like that people wouldn’t accept him as a veteran of the global war against terror because he wasn’t in the military – he was a contractor.

    A number of people examined his records and decided that he wasn’t all that he said that he was – some of his training was lacking. So he sued them. As far as I know, that case is still wending it’s way through the court system.

    Yesterday, we got word that Cody Lundin, Canterbury’s replacement on the show is suing Teti, according to TMZ;

    Lundin says producers made it look like he was losing it on set — but according to the docs, his partner, Joe Teti, was the real menace. He says while shooting in Norway … Teti threatened to “bury” him on a mountain while waving around an ice axe. During a shoot in Hawaii, Lundin says Teti threatened to impale him with a spear.

    Lundin says Teti, a former CIA operative, once said … “You better not blow this for me … I think you know what is going to happen to you” — and also flaunted pics of people he allegedly killed during his CIA days.

    I have no idea how we dodged the lawsuit that Teti filed against the world, so I won’t poke this bear, either.