Over at American Thinker, writer/editor Rick Moran wrote a piece about new additions to the political lexicon based on the name of the Obamacare architect who bragged about how the Obama administration lied rrepeatedly and often about that POS legislation to get it passed. Moran noted these neologisms from the Washington Times: Grubergate, gruberish, grubered, grubermanie, moneygrubering and gruberpalooza. Moran then offered some of his own creations: grubermentia, disgrubered, foregruber, gruberful.
He then invited commenters to come up with more and boy did they.
Federal Gruberment, Gruber-in Chief, Holy gruber! Scoobygruber, gruberphobia, GRUBAR, Grube Goldberg, grubies, gruberites, gruberesque, grubertopia, Gruberfest, Gruberizing of America, gruberballs, grubertastic, gruberlicious, gruberphobic, grubermania, gruberosis, gruberitis, and on and on.
Based on some of the colorful terms I’ve seen here at TAH used to describe Stolen Valor miscreants, I thought I’d toss out a challenge: you guys and girls got any more gruberisms?
Category: Health Care debate
-

Gruberisms
-
About That New ObamaCare “Open Season” . . . .
Well, it’s ObamaCare sign-up season again. By all accounts, things are going better than last year – though that wouldn’t take much, given last year’s fiasco.
So, that means all the problems are fixed, and everything is just “hunky-dory”, right? Um, well . . .
- Out in Washington state – you know, the home of MicroSoft, and a high-tech area of extreme expertise – apparently not.
- Healthcare.gov also apparently is having its share of issues this time around. Looks like returning users are having a hard time reactivating and logging into their accounts.
- But the
clueless but useful idiots and/or intentionally mendacious propagandistsObamaCare advocates are still working at getting the word out – at nail salons, pizzerias, mosques and bars.
I swear, you just couldn’t make this sh!t up if you tried. No one would buy it as fiction.
-
More “Words of Wit and Wisdom” from Jonathan Gruber
Well, there he goes again. And again.
And he’s getting paid, too.
Remember Jonathan Gruber? Apparently the 3 videos I discussed yesterday – showing Gruber repeatedly calling the US public “stupid” – weren’t all of his past “pearls of wisdom” concerning ObamaCare and/or US healthcare policy. A couple of more have surfaced.
What does he say in these new “nuggets”? Well, let’s see. In one, he says that the Massachusetts health care system he helped design was a scam from day one and only succeeded because Massachusetts conned the Federal government into paying a big chunk of the cost. Here’s the “money quote” (pun intentional; material in italics added for clarity):
“The dirty secret in Massachusetts is the feds paid for our bill, okay?” he [Gruber] said. “In Massachusetts we had a very powerful senator you may know named Ted Kennedy. . . . Ted Kennedy and smart people in Massachusetts had basically figured out a way to sort of rip off the feds for about 400 million dollars a year.”
In another, he openly mocks a critic of single-payer, government-funded healthcare systems, comparing the critic to an adolescent child. Nice. And very indicative of where Gruber lies (second intentional pun) politically.
Ya know, Gruber sounds to me like your sterotypical arrogant ivory-tower pr!ck who’s never really had much to do with the real world. If I didn’t know better, I’d swear he was a professor at some college in New England who had never really held a job outside academia. Well, except for those hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars he’s been getting over the past few years for speaking in favor of, performing analysis concerning, and executing various other consulting tasks promoting ObamaCare.
Ya know, to me it almost looks as if he might just have a conflict of interest in that last, or an ethical problem vis-à-vis MIT policies. But what do I know?
-
Ever Wonder What Those Who Wrote the ObamaCare Law REALLY Think About Us?
Well, I’ll let one of them tell you. The clips below are from a guy named Jonathan Gruber – one of the law’s architects, and an economics professor at MIT.
He further states his belief that American voters are stupid here (it’s at around 31:00 of an hour-long video – sorry, I can’t find a shorter clip).
And, finally – we have this:
Yep. According to one of its authors, ObamaCare was crafted the way it was because its authors thought “the American people are too stupid to understand the difference”. That explains a lot.
Oh, and Gruber now says he “regrets” calling the American people “stupid”. Yeah? Well, I have one thing to say to that: “Bullsh!t.” He doesn’t regret saying that at all.
What he regrets is getting caught on video telling someone his true opinion. Because it’s on video, he can’t now deny what he actually said or how he actually feels about his fellow citizens. He regrets being exposed as a Nanny-state Marxist who feels his fellow citizens are too stupid to take care of themselves. And he also undoubtedly regrets the fact that former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi – who repeatedly cited his work by-name during the prelude to that middle-of-the-night, “we have to pass it to find out what’s in it” rush to enact ObamaCare – now denies knowing who he is.
You probably only heard about this guy’s statements recently, if you’ve heard about him at all. That’s because it wasn’t the media that originally found his remarks about the US public. Hell, given the prolonged attachment of the media’s collective lips to the POTUS’s butt during past few years I’d guess they’d have buried it anyway. And the media is still keeping this mostly quiet today.
So, who broke the story? Turns out it was an investment broker who couldn’t keep his health plan during the initial ObamaCare rollout. He got p!ssed at being baldfaced lied to, and started looking into the background and past public statements of those who wrote the ObamaCare law. See the first link below for details.
So, we have a monumentally stupid law – which was written the way it was because the people writing it thought American voters were too stupid to notice. And now they’ve got their butts in a sling because the American voters DID notice – and don’t like being played for fools. The irony there is simply stunning. You couldn’t make this sh!t up if you tried.
Some of these video clips of Gruber have had a way of disappearing from university and/or other public sources (imagine that). So in case that happens again, below are links to some of the original news sources on the matter.
Meet the Mild-Mannered Investment Adviser Who’s Humiliating the Administration Over Obamacare
Yet Another Video Emerges Of Obamacare Architect Calling Americans ‘Stupid’
In Third Video, Obamacare Architect Talks About ‘Basic Exploitation’ Of American Voters
“An’ Tommy ain’t a bloomin’ fool — you bet that Tommy sees!”
-
Another Periodic ObamaCare Update
Another look at what new and novel f-ups instances of incredible incompetence idiocy monumental clusterf**ks events are occurring under the “ObamaCare” banner.
- A Second ObamaCare-related Site Also Has Massive Problems
- NY Times: Insurers Expect Greatly Higher Prices, Even More Problems This Year
- H&R Block CEO: Expect Problems With ObamaCare Tax Forms
- 300,000 May Lose Coverage Due to Residency Documentation Problems
- California: Can We Set Up an “Auto-Renewal” Option? Um, Well, Not Really.
- Wanna fix a problem with your application? Tough. Healthcare.gov still doesn’t work well enough to allow that.
Oh, and remember when I wrote that the incompetent cretins in charge responsible Administration officials were flatly refusing to release any information about the “healthcare.gov” system security plan? Well, it looks like we now might know the real reason why the Administration was so reluctant to divulge any information. Apparently system security for Healthcare.gov was as competently managed as the website’s implementation.
The hackers didn’t take any data. Instead, they . . . planted malware.
Oh, and that’s only a part of the story. Apparently it’s been known since February that there was a good chance the site might be vulnerable. It seems that some of the developers of the website worked for a firm known to have connections to the Belarussian government.
. . .
Good grief. We need to rip this absolute abomination of a law into small pieces – all roughly 1,000 pages of it; burn those pieces to ash; mix the resulting ash with quicklime and water; and dump that caustic slurry down an abandoned mine. Now.
Author’s note: my apologies for the inadvertent duplication of text in the article as originally posted. It’s fixed now.
-
Give Even the Devil His Due
Regular TAH readers know I
hate ObamaCare with a passionthink ObamaCare is an idiotic, asinine abominationdon’t much care for ObamaCare. And I think it’s rollout has beenas f’ed up as a football batexceedingly poorly managed and executed. In fact, I really couldn’t think of anything that thefools and toolsindividuals responsible for ObamaCare had done correctly.Until now. This week, the Obama Administration did something laudable with ObamaCare.
No, they didn’t suspend it and call for Congress to repeal it. But this week it was announced that for some 310,000 persons with inconsistent ObamaCare applications, submission of proof of citizenship or legal residence would be required. If no proof of citizenship is submitted by 5 September, on 30 September their ObamaCare plans supposedly will be cancelled.
I’ll believe that when I see it happen, of course. And I have no doubt this Administration will find multiple new and novel ways to screw this up by-the-numbers, too. They’re damn good at that.
But give even the devil his due. ObamaCare is massively FUBAR – but this is at least one tiny, baby step in the right direction.
Now, let’s see if we can “do the right thing” and put ObamaCare completely and permanently out of its misery. Then burn the corpse, and bury the ashes in quicklime.
-
Yer Periodic ObamaCare Update
A quick look at recent news for ObamaCare (AKA the Putrid Pile of Awful, Crappy Asininity Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) :
- Doctors Begin Refusing ObamaCare Patients
- Cost for ObamaCare Website? $840M – including $150M in Cost Overruns
- . . . And We Should Still Expect More Website Problems During the Next Signup Period
- Plus, HHS Has a Huge ObamaCare Paperwork Backlog
- More Subsidy Issues, Large Florida Price Increases Expected, Unpopularity Soars
- So, ObamaCare Worked Well in CA? Well, Not For Some People in Malibu
- But ObamaCare Does Support Employees’ Breast-Feeding Rights
- Extra Costs in Massachusetts Because of ObamaCare Issues? $173M
- Vermont Fires Their ObamaCare Site Contractor – the Same Contractor the Feds Fired this Year – After Spending $66.7M
- ObamaCare Quirks Actually Encourage 30% of 24-Year-Olds to Stay Uninsured
And, finally:
Yeah, that ObamaCare is just the shizz, ain’t it?
Time to put it out of its misery, then burn the remains. Then bury the ashes and cover them with quicklime.
-
More About That “Rousing Success” Called ObamaCare
Time to take another look at our good POTUS’s signature accomplishment, ObamaCare. We all know it’s working out just so splendidly, right?
Well, it is until you ignore the
baldfaced liespropagandapure spinsmoke and mirrorssomewhat misleading numbers quoted by the current Administration. When you look at the actual numbers, and compare them against past estimates . . . the situation seems decidedly less than rosy.Here’s an example. The Administration recently noted that ObamaCare “exceeded expectations” by getting it’s 8-millionth person signed up – when its enrollee target was 7 million. This was touted to the press as a “victory” – and proof of how well ObamaCare is “working”.
However, “ground truth” is a bit different.
At the time of the announcement, somewhere between 15% and 20% of signups hadn’t yet paid their first insurance premium. Until they do, they’re not yet an “enrollee” – because they don’t have any insurance until they’ve paid that first premium. A fair number likely never will pay up.
That means the actual number of ObamaCare enrollees was actually somewhere between 6.4 and 6.8 million – not the 8 million the Administration touted.
A more detailed examination yields some other rather damning information. At its beginning in 2009, 38 million people were estimated to be eligible for ObamaCare but uninsured. By this point in time CBO had estimated 19 million would be newly covered; CMS had estimated 26 million would be newly insured. So, how many who previously had no health insurance actually are now insured?
The answer is somewhere between 3.4 and 3.6 million. That’s a bit over 15% of the number of previously-uninsured people that CMS estimated would be covered by ObamaCare by this point in time.
Why so low? Two reasons.
First: far fewer signed up under ObamaCare than CMS (or CBO) had anticipated would have signed up by now. And second: because about half of the ObamaCare signups previously had insurance, but lost their insurance because it “didn’t qualify” under new ObamaCare mandates – regardless of whether or not it previously met their needs.
The Daily Signal has a great article on the snake oil the Administration’s selling regarding ObamaCare. It’s worth reading – but here’s the “money chart” from the article:

Yeah, that ObamaCare is truly wonderful – ain’t it? It’s just been a complete “success” so far.
We need to kill it with fire, and bury the ashes in quicklime. Now.