Category: Gun Grabbing Fascists

  • The Colorado recall succeeds

    According to the LA Times, the recall election in Colorado succeeded last night. Here are the election results from the Denver Post.

    In an unprecedented backlash, two state lawmakers who helped stiffen Colorado’s gun laws were ousted Tuesday in a recall that turned into a nationally watched referendum on gun control.

    Colorado Senate President John Morse, who shepherded the legislation to passage, was defeated on a 51%-49% vote. Sen. Angela Giron of Pueblo, a fellow Democrat who voted in favor of the measures, lost 56% to 44%. They were replaced by Republicans who opposed the new restrictions.

    Of course, although it was about guns in the smaller sense, it was more about freedom. State legislators are now on notice that the way they try to restrict the freedoms of their constituents will affect their political futures. Most affected by the recall vote yesterday is Michael Bloomberg. As Giron had told the New Republic earlier in the week;

    “For Mayors Against Illegal Guns, if they lose even one of these seats, they might as well fold it up. And they understand that,” she said.

    The billionaire’s group had pumped over $350,000 into the recall election to little effect. On the other side, the NRA only contributed $100,000 to the effort, probably because it wasn’t a hard sell to Coloradans that their legislature is out of control. Numerous sheriffs in the State had already said that they wouldn’t go out of their way to enforce the new gun laws. The recall in Colorado is also a preview of how the midterm elections will look next year, especially if the president and his lap dog, Joe Bite me, continue harping on their gun grabbing.

  • Stupid Left on Chris Lane murder

    Chris Lane was killed in Oklahoma this week by three youths, ostensibly because they were bored, according to one of the perpetrators. So while most Americans are wondering why this isn’t being made a national issue like the Trayvon Martin death, the left is scurrying to make it about their agenda instead. Alex Seitz-Wald at Salon, tries to tell us that the two deaths were different because the police didn’t arrest George Zimmerman immediately after Martin’s death. Well, they did bring him in for questioning immediately following the incident, but they obviously didn’t have a case – proven by the outcome of his trial – so why would they have arrested him just because public opinion had determined he was guilty?

    So, the other day, at the daily White House press conference, one of the reporters asked if there was a statement from the President regarding Chris Lane. The spokesdingus, Josh Earnest, said that he wasn’t familiar with the case. When made familiar with the case he said that the president didn’t want to get in the way of the legal process, you know like the president didn’t want to get in the way of the legal process against George Zimmerman.

    What prompted me to write this, was a few minutes of a discussion on Fox news this morning when some ditz blamed the Republican-led Congress for the Lane murder. She said that schools are cutting back their extra-curricular programs because of federal budget cuts and that’s why unsupervised youths are out thrill-killing foreign students. Yeah, I’m sure that’s it. It’s been only a few months since any cutbacks have happened, and I’m sure this problem with these kids started only recently. And, oh, by the way, school is out for the summer, so how could more school activities have prevented this senseless murder?

    Of course, the ditz also mentioned gun control, but it was already illegal for those three teens to own a gun and that didn’t seem to stop them. yeah, she wanted to ban all guns, and commandeer this issue as an excuse. Gun laws don’t work. Period.

    But, see the Left doesn’t want to admit that they’ve created the mess that inspired this particular murder. One of the perpetrators in the Lane murder has Tweeted that he has beaten 5 white people since Zimmerman was determined to be innocent by a jury. Because the jury didn’t reach the same conclusion as the animals who are prowling our streets in search of a thrill. If the Left actually admitted to what the problem is here, they’d have to admit that everything they’ve pushed in recent years in order to remain relevant has led to this murder.

  • Gun laws for low-information voters

    The Washington Post sounds an alarm from The Third Way, a leftist think tank, that the internet is facilitating gun sales and that it’s the most used medium for people who want to avoid background checks.

    At any given time, more than 15,000 guns were for sale in those states, according to the study, and more than 5,000 of them were semi-automatic weapons. Nearly 2,000 ads were from prospective buyers asking to buy specifically from private sellers, where no background checks are required.

    “At this point, this is the biggest loophole in the background check system,” said Lanae Erickson Hatalsky, director of social policy and politics at Third Way.

    Background checks — designed to keep guns out of the hands of convicted felons, domestic violence perpetrators or the severely mentally ill — are mandatory for gun sales at retail stores, but not at gun shows or for private sales, such as between neighbors and family members.

    What this breathless reporting doesn’t mention is that these guns are being bought and sold within the same State. It’s like buying from your neighbor doesn’t require background checks because it’s private sale within the frontiers of a single state.

    Federal laws already mandate that interstate sales be between Federal Firearms licensed dealers. If I was selling a gun across state lines to Maryland, ten miles from my house, I’d have to take a firearm to a local dealer and pay him to ship it to a dealer near the buyer, where the buyer would have to go through background checks. So, it’s already illegal to sell a gun that will end up across state lines without a background check.

    But, by all means let’s keep the public ignorant about the laws that are already in place so we can pass even more laws. By the way, I’ve bought two guns on the internet and had to go through background checks. I’ve also bought two guns at gun shows in recent years and went through background checks.

  • New York mayor tells how Bloomberg’s group misled him

    Misfit Politics has a letter from Brian Maher, the mayor of Walden, New York which tells how he was hoodwinked into joining the Michael Bloomberg group of “Mayors Against Illegal Guns”. He tells how he was convinced to sign a “petition” calling for safer communities, which of course, being a politician, he did.

    What I found out later is that my name was being used in anti-gun propaganda to further the personal agenda of Mayor Bloomberg.

    The organization never asked for permission or asked for approval to use my name to promote their agenda. Never was any information disclosed to me about the organization being in favor of gun control or that they would use my position as Mayor to spend millions of dollars to try to take away the rights of legal gun owners.

    This is not my surprised look. But then Mayor Maher, tried to get out of the organization that he says that he didn’t join in the first place;

    …it took several months to contact the organization as they concealed information about the people behind the group. After several attempts and requests to be removed, I did finally receive a call from a representative of the organization attempting to “buy me off” by promising political donations in return for my continued membership.

    Still not surprised. It’s characteristic of the anti-gun people to lie, obfuscate and dodge the truth, becuase, after all, we’re talking about the way they feel about themselves, not any sort of facts or connection to reality. The same way they fear large sodas and baby formula, they fear guns enough to make shit up. Buncha cowards.

  • Toy gun buy back; the natural “progression” of things

    Eggs sends us a link from Tucson’s KGUN9 in which they report that some hand-wringing “progressives” are sponsoring a toy gun buy back program;

    They’re nothing but plastic, wood and paint.

    They shoot styrofoam and squirt water.

    But some worry these toys carry a menacing message.

    “By having a toy guns around the house, they look at it as just a toy,” said Lieutenant Jeff Inorio of the South Tucson Police Dept. “So what makes that kid not pick up a real gun thinking its also a toy?”

    […]

    “Our kids are growing up in a very harsh reality,” said director Gloria Hamelitz. “Kids dying in school– its happening and we need to do something about it.”

    […]

    “It probably leads to kids wanting real guns at a younger age,” said one man. “It probably leads to more violent behaviors.”

    And the hippies can sleep at night knowing that they “did something” in their tiny warped little minds. I guess it doesn’t matter that majority of Americans are snickering behind their backs because of their naivete and total disregard of common sense. Maybe they can partner up with the LAPD which also buys back harmless plastic tubes as if they’re doing something.

  • Washington Post’s nation of victims

    The Washington Post‘s editorial board tries to influence the “stand your ground” discussion that’s going on in the country and of course they take the side of the criminals and criminalize the victim;

    Instead of requiring potential victims of crime to retreat if they have a safe escape route, these laws allow people to use deadly force without attempting to avoid a potentially lethal confrontation. They also often contain other generous protections for killers claiming self-defense.

    So the victims become “killers” in the space of two sentences.

    There is a reason that the duty to retreat is a concept respected by centuries of legal application. Setting a laxer standard encourages tragic mistakes, poor judgment and perhaps even vigilantism. A recent study from two Texas A&M University researchers found that “lowering the expected cost of lethal force causes there to be more of it.” Stand-your-ground states saw more homicides than their peers — about 600 more a year over the period they studied. One possible explanation is that stand-your-ground laws encourage people to escalate conflicts rather than withdraw.

    What about the criminals’ “duty to retreat”? I have no way to escape someone who has forcibly gained entrance to my residence because I can barely walk. So if a criminal doesn’t want to be shot, he should depart as soon as the Glock 30 comes off my night table, because it’s his duty to stop in the commission of his crime. I’m not going to shoot someone in the back who is making his escape from the ten rounds of .45 caliber ammunition. So, why is it my duty to retreat, something I’m physically incapable of doing anyway?

    Criminals have a duty to society to not commit their crimes, once they’ve violated their part of the social contract, they should expect whatever they’re dealt. And suppose that while I’m beating a hasty retreat, I get shot in the back? Do you think a criminal will respect my duty to retreat? They already broke into my house, so I’m sure they don’t want to leave witnesses to their crime. Who is going to protect my family when I’m laying bleeding on the floor after I fulfilled my duty to retreat?

    This is why we aren’t able to fight wars anymore, too. We’re supposed to be better than our enemies who kill us anytime, using any means necessary, but we have to play by our arbitrary rules, hoping the enemy will abide by the same rules after we’ve set the example for them. Of course, they never do, and our troops are put at a disadvantage which ends up costing lives and limbs. Remember after the Gulf War we had to stop destroying Iraqi equipment because we were being mean to the Iraqis. As soon as they made good their escape, they turned their weapons on their own unarmed minority groups while we stood and watched them do what we should have done to them.

    Now the left wants to turn us into a nation of victims by making it the law that we abandon our families and homes to the criminals hoping that those criminals will be better people for it. Every day we here at TAH post stories about folks who rescued their families from violent criminals by standing their ground and refusing to be victims.

    Yes, more criminals are killed than victims, why is the Washington post and the Obama Administration so convinced that is a bad thing?

  • The Biden defense

    KOIN reports that a man in Vancouver, Washington was arrested for discharging his firearm in his neighborhood. He says that he only did it because he was taking Joe Biden’s advice. You remember when Vice President Biden advised women to scare off prowlers around their house by going out on their balcony and fire a double-barreled into the air, right?

    Jeffery Barton, 52, pleaded not guilty to one count of illegal aiming or discharging a firearm at his arraignment in Clark County Court.

    Barton reportedly admitted to deputies that he fired his weapon while chasing away people who he thought were breaking into his vehicles at 5804 NE 124th St. in the early morning hours Monday.

    Deputies are investigating whether a large teen party that got out of control at a neighbor’s home may have been linked to the shooting. However, at this point, deputies have said there was no evidence of prowlers on Barton’s property.

    Outside the courtroom Wednesday, Barton cited the vice president in defense of his actions.

    “I did what Joe Biden told me to do,” Barton told KOIN. “I went outside and fired my shotgun in the air.”

    Well, anyone taking the Vice president’s advice, about anything, deserves what they get. But he should subpoena Biden for his trial as expert testimony.

  • White House statement on Zimmerman acquital

    So, here’s the text entitled simply “Statement by the President“;

    The death of Trayvon Martin was a tragedy. Not just for his family, or for any one community, but for America. I know this case has elicited strong passions. And in the wake of the verdict, I know those passions may be running even higher. But we are a nation of laws, and a jury has spoken. I now ask every American to respect the call for calm reflection from two parents who lost their young son. And as we do, we should ask ourselves if we’re doing all we can to widen the circle of compassion and understanding in our own communities. We should ask ourselves if we’re doing all we can to stem the tide of gun violence that claims too many lives across this country on a daily basis. We should ask ourselves, as individuals and as a society, how we can prevent future tragedies like this. As citizens, that’s a job for all of us. That’s the way to honor Trayvon Martin.

    Really? Are we going to turn this into a discussion about gun control? And what about the legislation that failed in Congress earlier this year would have prevented George Zimmerman from defending himself? He legally owned a gun, which means he jumped through the background check hoops, he had a permit to carry the gun, again legally. He had no violent or criminal history. He fired one round, so magazine capacity isn’t an issue, there was no bayonet lug or grenade launcher on his pistol. No flash suppressor, the magazine was inserted into the pistol grip, so it wasn’t on Dianne Feinstein’s list of forbidden guns.

    What does the Zimmerman trial have to do with gun control? Other than the fact that it provides an opportunity for various members of the Left to call me a coward on Facebook because I legally own and carry a gun today.

    Restricting the sale and possession of hoodies would have had a greater effect on the outcome of that encounter in Florida than restricting the sale and possession of guns.