Category: Gun Grabbing Fascists

  • Bredesen Spokesman: ‘Gun Nuts’ Are ‘Biggest Terrorist Organization on The Planet’

    Bredesen Spokesman: ‘Gun Nuts’ Are ‘Biggest Terrorist Organization on The Planet’

     

    A top spokesman for the Tennessee Democratic Party’s effort to get Phil Bredesen elected senator has said he views “white male” gun owners as “the biggest terrorist organization on the planet.”

    Mark Brown is communications director for Tennessee Victory 2018, a project of the state Democratic party that’s been working exclusively on electing Bredesen. The group is hosting Bredesen for a Johnson City meet-and-greet on Thursday afternoon.

    I don’t know how many of you identify as “white male gun owners”, but you people have issues.  I guess some of you Gun Nutz even support this Trump guy.

    In one post Brown wrote, for example, “Fuck reaching out to Trump voters, The idiots aren’t listening.”

    Ok idiots, listen up.  Mark Brown said in a 2015 post on his BookOfFace …

     “white male ‘Murican gun nuts” are “the biggest terrorist organization on the planet.”

    I am no terrorologist but it seems that we better do something about all these white male Trumtard Gun Nutz.

     

     

    Source: Bredesen Spokesman: ‘Gun Nuts’ Are ‘Biggest Terrorist Organization on The Planet’

  • She’s Baaaaaack!

    You all remember Emma Gonzales, don’t you? Lovely young girl, despite the shaved head. Such crocodile tears she wept for as long as she was onstage, and then hey! Presto! They vanished. She was also good at reddening her eyeballs. One can only hope she’ll get glaucoma out of it, or worse.

    https://www.nraila.org/articles/20181012/who-s-bs-ing-now-gonzalez-argues-for-gun-confiscation-but-insists-she-s-pro-second-amendment

    And that bald head? I thought it was only nuns and Marines that shaved their heads. Well, nuns sort of are Marines, wearing black habits – the Army of God or something like that.

    But I digress… somewhat.

    It seems that Ms. Gonzalez is back, in fine fettle, arguing for confiscation but insisting that she is so very 2nd Amendment-friendly… except for those parts about confiscation and banning guns and – well, such a plan she has for Others (that’s us) to follow that you have to read it for comprehension, not just context.  And you have to do it without throwing things, too. She thinks the Australian confiscation plan was just great! And ditto, the UK, except that in both Oz and Merry Olde England, people are still allowed to have weapons – for hunting, target shooting, and other such endeavors.

    Just to make it clear where she stands:  “… if she actually read the website of the gun control group for which she is a national spokesperson, she would learn a “comprehensive semi-automatic assault rifle ban” is among its agenda items.  The ban it has in mind not only “prohibits the future production and sale of these weapons” but “provides a solution for dealing with those semi-automatic assault rifles that are already owned,” such as “a buyback program” for lawfully obtained guns. Needless to say, this measure by definition would affect those who are “already … responsible gun owner[s]” and force them to give up their property.”

    “That’s not all. Even if we assume she doesn’t know what her own organization wants, we have her own words delivered on other occasions to explain exactly what she means.”

    “At a public appearance in May, Gonzalez told her audience, “It’s just cheaper to take away the guns that aren’t imperative to living in America,” adding, “You don’t need an AR-15 to protect yourself in bed from a robber at night.” She even hinted on that occasion that guns should be limited to the military: “Go join the Army if you want to have fun shooting off a weapon, and serve your f***ing country.” – NRA article

    I really do appreciate her referring to this nation of ours as ‘your fucking country’. She can leave any time. I’m sure either Venezuela or Cuba would welcome the little bitch with open arms.  As nasty as she is, she might even fascinate or amuse Vlad Putin for a brief moment or two.

    Now, don’t be too easy on her. She’s only 18, hasn’t really seen the world for the vicious, gangbanging place it is, nor does she have even a vague understanding of the conflict of meanings manifest in everything she says.

    Deep down inside, she’s an apprentice bitch on wheels, practicing on the unsuspecting souls who support her as-yet-unspoken agenda without realizing what sort of quagmire they’ll be marching into by that very support of her.

    Just wanted you to know that I’m not snoozing here.

  • NRA to Congressional Gun Controllers: The American People Will Never Give Up Their Guns

    NRA to Congressional Gun Controllers: The American People Will Never Give Up Their Guns

    On Friday, the NRA posted a message for gun controllers in Congress and elsewhere saying, “We the People will never give up our guns.”

    They posted the message:

    WE WILL NEVER GIVE UP OUR FIREARMS.
    The tweet coincides with Democrat Phil Bredesen (TN) running for Senate on a gun control platform in Tennessee and Democrat Beto O’Rourke running on a gun control platform against Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) in Texas. Gun control legislation sponsor Kyrsten Sinema (D) is vying for a Senate seat against pro-gun Martha McSally (R) in Arizona.

    Moreover, Sens. Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Joe Donnelly (D-IN), Joe Manchin (D-WV), Bill Nelson (D-FL), and Jon Tester (D-Mont.) are all running for re-election with recent gun control support as part of their political history. Some of these Sens., like Nelson, for instance, are for bans on entire categories of firearms.

    The NRA’s message to these Democrats and their surrogates in Hollywood and the establishment media is clear: “We the People will never give up our firearms.”

    The tweet from the NRA comes as Democrats double down on gun control as a central message for the fast-approaching midterms.

    FMCDH…

    Source: NRA to Congressional Gun Controllers: The American People Will Never Give Up Their Guns

  • A Republican Governor Shoots Himself in the Foot

    An article in the WSJ has me wondering what the requirements for claiming to be Republican are and what kind of hogwash is being sold by politicians.

    By Geoffrey Norman:

    For a small state, Vermont has a way of getting noticed. It was the first state to recognize same-sex civil unions and the first to experiment with a single-payer health-care system. Two Vermont politicians—Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Gov. Howard Dean—have sought the White House in recent years. This year, Vermont Democrats made Christine Hallquist the first transgender candidate for governor in any state.

    Ms. Hallquist’s Republican opponent, Gov. Phil Scott, has gone from being one of the nation’s most popular governors to one of its least liked. The reason? Guns. In the days following the February school shootings in Parkland, Fla., a Vermont boy threatened a similar massacre. In April, Mr. Scott signed legislation allowing guns to be taken from people who pose an “extreme risk” of violence and those arrested on suspicion of domestic violence. The law also expanded background checks, banned bump stocks and limited magazine capacity.

    Not long ago, this would have been unthinkable in Vermont. As a House candidate in 1990, Mr. Sanders—who even then called himself a “socialist”—managed to snag the endorsement of the National Rifle Association. He understood how rural Vermonters felt about guns. His opponent supported a ban on “assault rifles.” It cost him the election.

    Vermont has become more liberal as people from neighboring states settle here. Still, signing that legislation cost Mr. Scott his claim on the affections of old-time Vermonters. He has a background in the construction business, and he raced cars at a dirt track called Thunder Road. He gained popularity by promising to hold the line on taxes and focus on jobs so that children the state had spent lavishly to educate wouldn’t leave once they graduated.

    These were familiar themes. The number of students in Vermont’s schools has declined by some 20% since 1997. School spending has gone up 48%, and the ratio of teachers to students is among the lowest in the nation. The bill comes due in the form of property-tax rates that are more than 50% higher than the national average and climbing.

    The economy has been anything but dynamic. For years the labor force shrank as young people departed and their parents retired. There are 16,000 fewer people in the workforce than there were in 2009. Employers complain they can’t find qualified people to take jobs. The Scott administration will soon begin offering $10,000 payments to telecommuters who move to Vermont. It’s generous, but it may not be enough if the Legislature keeps raising taxes.

    A state-government shutdown was averted this summer when Mr. Scott opted not to veto a bill raising taxes. The Democratic-controlled Legislature insisted on a tax hike even though Vermont had a $55 million budget surplus for 2018. Were it not for the damage to his favorability ratings from the gun legislation, Mr. Scott might have had the political capital to stand up to lawmakers on taxes.

    Vermont governors serve two-year terms, and no incumbent has been defeated for re-election since 1962. But Mr. Scott was challenged from the right in the Republican primary. His opponent’s campaign was fueled by hostility to the gun bill and he got more than 30% of the vote with turnout exceeding expectations. Mr. Scott himself said he was surprised his opponent’s share of the vote wasn’t higher.

    So now Mr. Scott is running against a transgender candidate promising free college tuition, universal health care, paid family leave and a $15 minimum wage. Ms. Hallquist was equivocal when Mr. Scott pressed her in a debate on how she planned to pay for all of it. Perhaps, she said, the state could halve what it spends on its prison population. As for the possibility of a payroll tax, she said: “I’m not afraid of having a tax to be civilized and do those things but we’ll figure ways to fund things in whatever the best way possible is, but that is a collaborative decision. That’s why the governor should be working collaboratively with the Legislature to figure out how to do the right thing.”

    There once were some politicians who ran a campaign saying, “Everything that should be up is down and everything that should be down is up”.   I am not sure what defines a Republican or a Commie Pinko Hag anymore.

    The rest of the campaign promises to be similarly tedious. Though Mr. Scott has been wounded, he is generally expected to win. But, then, these haven’t been good times for expectations in American politics.

    Nor, particularly, for Vermont, which would like to pay people to come and enjoy its special “quality of life,” but where the malaise of the heartland manifests itself in the usual, depressing ways. According to a recent study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in 2014 nearly 5% of women who gave birth in Vermont hospitals had opioid use disorder—the highest, by far, in America, with the national average at 0.65%.

    That’s not a first to be proud of.

    Mr. Norman is a writer living in Vermont.

    A Republican Gun Grabber and a Weiner Denier are who the people of Vermont have set their hopes and dreams upon?  They need someone who is proud of their penis or at least someone who likes peni.  I don’t think putting someone into office that will reach out and grab people by their Glock is a good idea.  Here is a good idea for example:

    It’s perfect for those pesky home invasion opioid zombies.  You can purchase a few HERE.  

    As always…please kill responsibly.

     

  • Why Am I Not Surprised?

    Defensive gun use (DGU) happens more regularly in the United States than gun crimes, according to data the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) never publicized.    http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/22/guns-save-lives-cdc-never-publicized/ 

    Florida State University criminologist Gary Kleck has been arguing that point for a quarter of a century, saying that his own research led him to believe that DGU was far more prevalent than gun-control advocates claim.

    The CDC’s data, collected a few years after Kleck’s survey, appears to corroborate his findings, Reason.com reported. The question asked in the CDC survey addressed the use or threatened use of a firearm to deter a crime. “During the last 12 months, have you confronted another person with a firearm, even if you did not fire it, to protect yourself, your property, or someone else?”

    Kleck, upon reviewing the CDC’s data, noted just how close it came to mirroring his own.

    The final adjusted prevalence of 1.24% therefore implies that in an average year during 1996–1998, 2.46 million U.S. adults used a gun for self-defense. This estimate, based on an enormous sample of 12,870 cases (unweighted) in a nationally representative sample, strongly confirms the 2.5 million past-12-months estimate obtained Kleck and Gertz (1995)….CDC’s results, then, imply that guns were used defensively by victims about 3.6 times as often as they were used offensively by criminals.

    Many gun control advocates have complained about the fact that the CDC is limited with regard to research on gun violence. A 1996 amendment to a spending bill bars the organization from using congressionally allocated funds to “advocate or promote gun control.”

    What those fighting for stronger gun-control generally leave out is the fact that the CDC is not barred from doing any research on gun violence — and the research it has done in the last two decades has largely corroborated Kleck’s findings.

  • Dick’s Is Down

    Looks like Dick’s ideas of how to do things to please customers and bolster their public image is backfiring.

    https://www.nraila.org/articles/20180831/dick-s-sales-soft-following-anti-gun-efforts

    Their consolidated 2nd quarter earnings (all stores, all departments, all products) are down 4%. While this can legitimately be related to the decision by CEO Stack to cease and desist gun sales and destroy remaining stock in stead of returning those products to the manufacturers, the company, with help from CNN, America’s ‘most trusted name in news’ – the network that had Maddow’s bratchet-faced mug on display for hours during November 2016’s incorrect election forecast – considers acceptable a fabricated news release about this loss of earnings.

    CNN says now that investors should ignore Dick’s own admissions regarding the negative consequences of their gun control positions and blame stiff competition from online retailers and the store’s delicate relationship with one of its apparel brands for the inadequate performance.

    Yeah, okay. Denial of reality is a sign of something worse. CNN by now may be the worst propaganda rag/network since Pravda/Izvestia. Certainly, it is not a reliable source of information for anything. And if altering a sales report to suit their needs of reality is what CNN thinks makes them trustworthy, they have a problem.

    In May,  the Board of Governors for the National Shooting Sports Foundation – the firearm industry trade group – voted to expel the company “for conduct detrimental to the best interests of the Foundation.”

    Stack had already correctly predicted a negative effect on sales back in March. Loss of sales in all departments is not a good sign.

    Well, Gander Mountain is mostly gone into the mists of retail history.

    L. L. Bean has its own stores, but is still mostly camping, hiking and fishing, as it has always been. That, and duck boots.

    Bass Pro is still in business and seems to be thriving. Bass is the parent company of Cabela’s. Bass Pro has a fish-o-rama in the spring, about when the smelts are running in the Great Lakes.

    I think people will go where they feel welcome, not snubbed because they want a particular product.

    But then, I would question the idea that someone who is so blatantly anti-gun should be running a company that he has decided should no longer sell guns.

  • David Hogg Threatens to ‘Destroy’ Smith & Wesson

    hogg

    The Man with a Mission, David Hogg, apparently hasn’t been receiving his required amount of attention lately, so he’s come out with a new plan- threaten a manufacturing company for funds or else.

    Guns America reports Hogg, while participating in an anti-gun march in Massachusetts over the weekend, the gun-control crusader posted a ridiculous ultimatum to Smith & Wesson.

    Hogg told the popular firearms and ammunition manufacturer, headquartered in Springfield, via Twitter, that it had to fund “gun violence prevention research” to the tune of $5 million annually and cease making certain black rifles or else…

    Hogg and his posse of moonbat millennials would “destroy” S&W.
    “We will destroy you by using the two things you fear most,” wrote Hogg. “Love and economics see you soon.”

    Now, where I came from, this type of activity is known as “Extortion” and is generally frowned upon by Law Enforcement. Be that as it may, I don’t think S&W will pay a whole lot of attention to the attention whore Hogg.

    tip ‘o the hat to AW1 Rod for the link

  • ACLU Defends The NRA Against Andrew Cuomo’s ‘Blacklisting Campaign’

    NRA
    The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) defended the National Rifle Association (NRA) by opposing New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s attempts to put the gun advocacy group out of business.

    The ACLU has submitted an amicus brief in federal court, weighing in on the on-going battle between the Democrat Governor and the NRA.

    Wait, what?

    The Daily Caller reports the NRA filed a lawsuit against both Cuomo, and the state’s financial regulatory bureau contending that the agency instituted a “blacklisting campaign” by threatening insurers and other financial institutions that interacted with the organization. The bureau warned that by continuing to do business with the NRA, banks and insurance companies could face regulatory action.

    The NRA has subsequently been deprived of basic insurance and may be “unable to exist as a not-for-profit or pursue its advocacy mission.”

    While the ACLU has disagreed with the NRA on the meaning of the Second Amendment, the friend-of-the-court brief supported the NRA on behalf of the First.

    “Those allegations [made by the NRA] represent a blatant violation of the First Amendment,” the ACLU states. “Although public officials are free to express their opinions and may condemn viewpoints or groups they view as inimical to public welfare, they cannot abuse their regulatory authority to retaliate against disfavored advocacy organizations and to impose burdens on those organizations’ ability to conduct lawful business.”

    Cuomo has been a voracious critic of the NRA and has admitted to “proudly” trying to strong arm the group out of existence.

    “When an organization that is normally on the opposite side from you, joins you in a huge fight against a devout enemy, you know the gun-hating, gun-banning, bullying, anti-Second Amendment, enemies of Freedom are way out of control,” Marion Hammer responded on behalf of the NRA.

    I’m not a litigious type, normally. But I hope, after the NRA wins this court battle its lawyers sue the crap out of Cuomo and New York’s financial regulatory bureau for this egregious misuse of power.