Category: Guest Post

  • A Different Kind Of Stolen Valor

    viet-of-the-namPhoto by Rocklin Lyons

    Here’s a guest post from our very own Perry Gaskins. Perry was kind enough to school me a bit in copyrights, fair use, and protection of original expressions. I really appreciated that, and I try to walk with the angels in my posts. I can count on Perry to smack me if I stray.

    It’s no secret the news media has its fair share of hustlers, scoundrels, and fools. Still, only rarely does the press cross over to taking on the military in a personal manner. In a recent piece in Salon the writer Lucian K. Truscott IV comments on the recent resignation of Secretary of Defense James Mattis with a story titled Good riddance to James Mattis, Trump’s last general:

    Salon Link

    According to Salon’s own bio, Truscott is a graduate of West Point. Woven into the Mattis hit piece are also minor factoids about how Truscott was also once a platoon leader which is apparently supposed to show Truscott’s bonafides as a member of the warrior clan and resident Salon expert on things military.

    But here’s the thing: What the Salon bio doesn’t show is that Lucian K. Truscott IV did indeed graduate from West Point in 1969, and was stationed at Fort Carson for the next 13 months. Then when it apparently became likely that Truscott would be shipped to Viet Nam, our future Salon scribbler resigned his commission and received a discharge “under other than honorable conditions.” Evidently, and without putting too fine a point on it, when Truscott couldn’t be a REMF anymore, he decided to be a coward.

    Such a biographical omission, at least it seems to me, makes Truscott’s hypocrisy in the Mattis piece remarkable. What the piece also does is point out that not all stolen valor posers are those wearing a blinged-out biker vest, a do-rag, and hugging an emotional support dog. Sometimes they can hide in plain sight.

    And that would probably be more-or-less okay in the overall kharmic scheme of things, except that when the Army kicked Truscott to the curb, he didn’t fade into the background. Instead, he’s spent decades making a living by being a leftist press go-to guy for military issues. First at the Village Voice and now at Salon. Along the way, he’s also written six books. Most of those apparently having a military theme where Truscott is able to cash in on his West Point experience. Because, or so Truscott and Salon would apparently have you believe, being a graduate of West Point is the same as, like James Mattis, spending decades in active service.

    My own view is that Lucian K. Truscott IV, on his best day, isn’t qualified to shine James Mattis’ shoes. And the real mystery is why Salon pretends otherwise.

  • Guest Post by Perry Gaskins


    They sent me this secret invisibility formula. Take this stuff
    and we can walk right out of here. You go first…

    Hacker, Interrupted

    Julian Assange has lost his cat.

    As part of an apparent downward spiral marking his years holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, things for the Australian über hacker, alleged Pfc. Bradley Manning co-conspirator, and Wikileaks founder have continued to go from bad to more bad. Among other things, current Ecuadorian President Lenin Moreno, who considers Assange an inherited problem amounting to “more than a nuisance” has recently been annoyed by the fact Assange has been using embassy internet access to tweet support for Catalan independence which amounts to flipping the finger at Spain. Something Moreno would like to avoid.

    Evidently things got testy when the embassy cut off Assange’s internet access in March, and also let him know they were not amused he didn’t clean up after his cat. Assange’s own version of the cat controversy, according to an Italian newspaper account:

    Even the cat that once kept him company and “diffused tension” is gone, according to La Repubblica. “Assange preferred to spare the cat an isolation which has become unbearable and allow it a healthier life.”

    For those marking the calendar, it’s been eight years this week that Assange’s cyber bad boy career started to tank. It was on December 7, 2010 that Assange surrendered himself to British custody as the result of sexual assault charges by two women in Sweden. One of women victims apparently having said she objected to a close encounter of the Wikileaks kind if it didn’t involve use of a prophylactic.

    A few days later, with help from supporters, Assange was able to make more than $350,000 in bail. And for awhile, things weren’t so bad. There were the speaking gigs, the awards from a fawning news media and social justice groups, even talk of a movie deal. But the legal appeals to fight extradition to Sweden eventually all failed, and by June 2012 Assange sought asylum in the Ecuadorian Embassy where he now lives in a converted office with bars on the windows. As a result of the bail jumping to avoid showing up in court, the British government initially assigned police sentries to keep Assange from slipping out, but the cops were withdrawn a couple of years later.

    Also withdrawn as of last year were those pesky rape charges which made Assange dash into the embassy one step ahead of the posse in the first place. Part of the reason was due to legal statutes of limitations running out, another apparent part was that the Swedes simply got tired of Assange’s act. It’s probably reasonable to now wonder, if those charges have been dropped, what keeps Assange in his room? The answer, more likely than not, involves both legal nuance and politics.

    When Pfc. Bradley Manning was convicted of espionage, it was the result of stealing classified material from a secure facility at Forward Operating Base Hammer near Baghdad in Iraq. Among the first items Manning passed along to Wikileaks was video footage of an attack by helicopter gunships which came to be titled “Collateral Murder.”

    If Manning had come across the gunship video during his normal duties, he might have been able to later escape a harsh sentence by claiming to be a whistleblower. But later, by the time he was passing hundreds of thousands of cables he hadn’t read, he had crossed over into espionage.

    During the course of passing around all the secret stuff, evidence from chat logs between Manning and Assange indicate a strange relationship. Manning, a neurotic outcast at FOB Hammer, wanted a pal which led to apparent increased efforts to please Assange. There’s never been any evidence Assange warned Manning about what he was doing. Assange also seems to have taken it right to the edge of being an active participant in Manning’s thievery without crossing a thin line. Such as being coy about providing Manning with cracker code to break into even more systems.

    One of the things also making the prosecution of Assange tricky is the precedent of a 2001 Supreme Court decision, Bartnicki v. Vopper, which decided that 1st Amendment protections for the news media apply even if the published material is from a source that obtained it illegally.

    And such a court ruling raises yet another question: Should Wikileaks actually qualify as news media? According to Ben Laurie, a software engineer who sits on the Wikileaks board, the organization can best be described as an “open-source, democratic intelligence agency.” It can be argued in the Manning case that its main function was to act as a conduit for stolen classified documents, and not as a publisher in any conventional sense.

    Assange’s situation might have improved in more recent days except for a shift in political winds. Back in the days of still living large, for example, he hosted a television show on Russia Today, and had the support of Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, among others.

    Such support has evidently led to current allegations that Russian intelligence services were ultimately responsible for the Democratic Party nightmare of Wikileaks revelations close to the 2016 election. Those about Hillary Clinton’s personal email server, the DNC’s efforts to sandbag Bernie Sander’s campaign, and so forth.

    Which means a lot of the news media is now having a difficult time buying into the notion that hackers are also just journalists fighting for truth, justice, and freedom from condoms.

    A more recent development, so far unconfirmed, is that Assange met three times with Paul Manafort, a one-time President Trump associate, who is now a target of the Robert Mueller investigation. But then, it’s probably fair to ask, who isn’t a target of the Mueller investigation?

    CIA Director Mike Pompeo last year also called WikiLeaks “a non-state hostile intelligence service,” and there are now rumors of a sealed indictment with a laundry list of charges against Assange including espionage, conspiracy, theft or conversion of U. S. government property, and violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

    So Assange sits in his room likely waiting for a knock at the door, passing his days still weaving a web of intrigue, one keystroke at a time, based on a hacker ethic known only to himself.

    No friends. No movie deal. No cat.

  • Guest Post- Perry Gaskill

    amigos

    Down Along the Border

    You would have to be pretty hard-hearted to not have at least some minor sympathy for the poor wretches who are on pause waiting for an asylum hearing at the Tijuana border. It’s probably like spending weeks standing in line at DMV. And imagine the induced narcolepsy for the unlucky vato who winds up at the end of the queue.

    On the other hand, since available evidence points to the fact the alleged asylum seekers are actually garden-variety illegals testing a new way to game the system, does that mean they’ll want to cut in the front of the line? And if new line cutters cut in on prior line cutters in a line-cutting frenzy, it’s not difficult to imagine things reaching a level of line-cutting chaos not seen since a Sex Pistols concert…

    Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton demonstrates why she has more spin cycles than Maytag.

    Late last week, in an interview with the UK Guardian, the former Secretary of State and current commandante of the #resistance said if Europe doesn’t get a handle on its immigration problems, brought about by an influx of one million Muslims, both the EU and the U.S. risk the rise of “populist” right wing figures.

    “I admire the very generous and compassionate approaches that were taken particularly by leaders like Angela Merkel, but I think it is fair to say Europe has done its part, and must send a very clear message – ‘we are not going to be able to continue to provide refuge and support’ – because if we don’t deal with the migration issue it will continue to roil the body politic.”

    Clinton urged forces opposed to rightwing populism in Europe and the U.S. not to neglect the concerns about race and identity issues that she says were behind her losing key votes in 2016. She accused Trump of exploiting the issue in the election contest – and in office.

    For those playing at home, apparently among Clintonistas, populism is defined as getting majority support among voters in a democracy but only applies to those you disagree with. If you’re a Progressive, majority support is good because it’s democracy at work; if you’re a Conservative, it’s bad because reasons.

    Hillary also understandably did not mention to the Guardian what she was saying a few years ago. Or maybe she just forgot:

    “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the Hemisphere,” she said in a May 2013 (private) speech to the Brazilian bank Banco Itau, according to a speech transcript obtained by Wikileaks.

    With Thanksgiving over, and with 6800 or so Army troops still on the Mexican border, it might be interesting, at least for those of us easily amused, to start placing bets on a stand-down date and whether those same folks in uniform will be home for Christmas. Possible prizes for winners of the pool could include a free copy of the rumored upcoming Commissar Taylor bestseller How I Make Friends; consolation prizes for the unfortunate losers might be piñatas of gummi pendejos.

    I’m picking December 17. It’s the 115th anniversary of the Wright Brothers first powered flight at Kitty Hawk, and I’m feeling lucky…

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/22/hillary-clinton-europe-must-curb-immigration-stop-populists-trump-brexit

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/8/hillary-clinton-dreams-open-borders-leaked-speech-/

  • Guest Post- Perry Gaskill

    CC photo credit - Frank Hamilton for Baltimore City Paper
    CC photo credit – Frank Hamilton for Baltimore City Paper

    Why McRaven and McChrystal have it McWrong

    Of media gods and generals

    As part of a new ploy in its ongoing conflict with President Trump, the mostly New York City-based news media now seems to be shifting focus to a tactic of trying to drive a wedge between Trump and the military.

    In an interview this week with CNN, which has rippled like an outrage stone dropped in the hysteria pond, retired Admiral William McRaven reasserted claims that Trump was a threat to democracy.

    “I stand by my comment that the President’s attack on the media is the greatest threat to our democracy in my lifetime,” McRaven said, “When you undermine the people’s right to a free press and freedom of speech and expression, then you threaten the Constitution and all for which it stands.”

    Among those jumping in to cover McRaven’s six o’clock has been retired General Stanley McChrystal. Both are former commanders of the Joint Special Operations Command. McChrystal’s comments bear some minor irony, for those keeping score, because of him being fired by President Obama for the general’s critical riffs about the Obama administration during a 2010 Rolling Stone interview.

    Two things would seem to be a problem with giving too much credence to the comments of McRaven and McChrystal. The first is the logical fallacy of false authority. Although both of the former flag officers have shown themselves to be very good at the lethal business of military skills, their opinion of the news media has no more value than yours, mine, or the guy who sells papers from a kiosk on 42nd Street.

    Another thing to be skeptical of is the news media’s implied assumption that flag-rank military officers are somehow completely neutral when it comes to politics. This is something anybody who has reached the level of O-6 would probably suggest is right up there with an abiding belief in leprechauns. It might be pointed out, for example, that McRaven is likely to have been on a Hillary Clinton short list of those to be appointed to political high office had she been elected.

    It’s probably fair to say that the original framers of the Constitution, Franklin and Jefferson most noteworthy among them, had a fairly clear-eyed view of how the press was supposed to work under the 1st Amendment. The country, even then, had its share of saints and scoundrels trying to scribble out a living using the craft of journalism.

    It seems to me if the news media feels threatened now, which it does, the wounds it claims to have suffered, more often than not, have been self-inflicted. Somehow, the current mainstream media has adopted a posture that Trump is the enemy; anything to cause harm to his administration should be pursued by any means necessary, and any journalist who disagrees is to be considered a pariah. All of which should set off alarm bells for those thoughtful enough to want a press tasked with fairness and objectivity. In short, one doing its job.

    And despite what they might want everyone to believe, both the country and a free press can survive if the New York Times folds, or CNN winks out, or owner Jeff Bezos– who hates Donald Trump– decides to shut down the Washington Post tomorrow.

    Link: https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/18/politics/donald-trump-william-mcraven/index.html

  • Vietnam hero awarded the Navy Cross

    1st Sgt. John Lord, is presented with the Navy Cross

    Ret. Marine 1st Sgt. John Lord honored at ball; four fellow unit members present
    By Katy Sword

    Today’s Guest Post is brought to us by HMCS(FMF).

    Fifty years after Ret. Marine 1st Sgt. John Lord led his unit through an ambush during the Vietnam War, he was awarded the Navy Cross for his efforts.

    The Navy Cross is the second highest award a Marine can receive, outranked only by the Medal of Honor.

    Lord first received the Bronze Star for his efforts in 1975, seven years after he put himself in the crosshairs of a hidden North Vietnamese Army battalion to rescue his wounded comrades.

    On that fateful day, July 28, 1968, Lord’s platoon commander and senior leadership were wounded during an ambush. Lord “unhesitatingly maneuvered across the fire-swept terrain and skillfully deployed the platoon against the enemy,” according to the award citation.

    Lord then located one of the few remaining operational radios and began directing air support until reinforcements could arrive, all while rescuing his injured comrades.

    The day after the battle, Ret. Lt. Col. Michael Sweeney began advocating for the Navy Cross on Lord’s behalf for his heroic actions. Forty-three years later, Sweeney’s efforts were realized.

    Lord traveled from his home in Mesa, Ariz., to receive the award with family in Vancouver during the Marine Corps Birthday Ball on Saturday. The ceremony itself was a break in tradition, but a break considered by the hundreds in attendance worthwhile to recognize the 2,460th Marine to ever receive the Navy Cross.

    “It is one of the greatest honors of my career,” said an emotional Lt. Col. Health Freeman before introducing Lord. “It’s because of the love and faithfulness of those he served with and those he served under … his award was upgraded and that was so rightfully deserved.”

    In between a 12 sword salute and the traditional birthday cake presentation, Lord was finally presented with the Navy Cross 43-years in the making.

    The article in its entirety may be viewed at The Columbian

  • Hell freezes over

    perry guest post

    SF paper: Trump’s forest raking “rings true– to a degree”

    Today’s Guest Post is brought to you by Perry Gaskill.

    Just when you think the news media’s anti-Trump hysteria is to the point of needing a soaking down with a cold water hose, they can surprise you. In a story updated on Sunday, Phil Matier and Andy Ross, two writers who have long shared a column at the San Francisco Chronicle said that although President Trump might not have presented all the facts, he’s generally correct in calling bad forest management a big part of the recent California fires.

    The smoking gun, so to speak, is from California’s Little Hoover Commission in the form of a forest management report which considered not only drought conditions, but also a broad range of other issues. It’s called Fire on the Mountain:

    The report outlines factors that have led to the current forest crisis, including years of poor or nonexistent management policies, and the recent drought and a beetle infestation that killed an estimated 129 million trees across the state — trees that could go up in flames.

    It being California, the Little Hoover report has obviously found detractors. Among them have been both the John Muir Project and the Sierra Club. Their main argument appears to be, without putting too fine a point on it, that loggers are meanies and poopie heads.

    The Matier & Ross story can be found here: https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/matier-ross/article/Trump-s-claim-of-poor-California-forest-13400503.php

    Here’s the report link: https://lhc.ca.gov/report/fire-mountain-rethinking-forest-management-sierra-nevada

  • Guest Post from Poetrooper

    Trainer
    October 2, 2018
    Meanwhile, Trump’s economy births huge manufacturing contract
    By Poetrooper

    Like the Energizer Bunny, the Trump economy just keeps marching ahead and pounding that drum. Last week, Boeing announced that it has been awarded a $9.2 Billion Contract from the DoD to produce the new T-X Jet Trainer and training program the USAF will use to train pilots for the foreseeable future. I confess that when I first heard during the Obama administration that Saab was involved with the Boeing proposal, my immediate suspicion was that the jobs and income from this lucrative contract might be going offshore, as both Italy and South Korea were also in the running. It was all too easy to imagine a new economically incompetent or, worse, corrupt Clinton administration handing this fat domestic plum to a foreign aircraft-fabricator to piously and foolishly signal their utopian assurances to the larger community of the world.

    But that was before Trump’s election and his promised Make America Great Again economic renaissance made my concerns as obsolete as the fifty-year-old training aircraft in current use. Yes, Saab is partnered with Boeing and will share in the federal largesse, but this beautiful new aircraft will be 90% American-built, creating 17,000 lucrative aviation industry jobs in 34 states.

    t-x jet

    Show me any governor, even Democrat, who wouldn’t be salivating at the prospect of landing a few thousand, even a few hundred, of these high-paying jobs for his constituents. No doubt, deep-blue Democrats like Moonbeam and cuckoo Comrade Cuomo, whose coastal enclaves are now hemorrhaging high-paying jobs and had-enough citizens, will sniff sanctimoniously at being required to launder morally defiled defense dollars – all while furiously formulating new tactics for taxing the max away from these new golden geese. One certainty is that between now and the midterms, every Republican politician in every state should be touting this Trump retention of key manufacturing jobs, such skilled occupations as Obama had kissed off as long gone to the Third World, never to return to his America. They probably wouldn’t have come back to his, a Democrat-controlled, America – which is a good reason why sensible, hardworking citizens should never again give power to the max-taxing, jobs-destroying Democrats.

    This article is cross-posted at The American Thinker.

  • One of our resident Gold Star Mothers, Denise Williams sends another guest post.

    One of our resident Gold Star Mothers, Denise Williams sends another guest post.

    What The People Want

    This may help. If the copy gets formatted properly later, please delete this comment:

    Everyday, every single day, there is another howler monkey on the mainstream media screeching how “this”, whatever the manufactured outrage du jour is, “will bring down the Trump Presidency”. How in all that is good, sane and rational anyone would be joyful about bringing down the sitting President is beyond comprehension. I’ve heard it said, and I agree, that is akin to hoping the pilot of the plane we are all on crashes. But, I digress.

    The latest is a piece of work called, “Fear” by Bob Woodward. We all remember him, one of the duo who cultivated “Deep Throat” which led to Watergate and ultimately Nixon’s resignation. While that was a dark time in our Nation’s history, for a lot of reasons, the parallels to what is going on today seem much darker.

    In 1973, we were a Nation at war, an unpopular war to be sure. We had lost too many, far too many sons and daughters who were fighting in a land with place names most Americans never heard of, nor could they pronounce. The country was divided, politically and socially, divisions that seem quaint in comparisons to what is going on today. That is, if the mainstream media and political pundits are to be believed.
    Part of the pablum we are currently being fed is the idea that this President is the locus of all the division. He is the cause, that he tapped into some deep, savage, and unbridled hate for all that is good and right and fair and just that has long lurked just beneath the surface of the uncivilized masses. Those who know better due to their superior education, intellect, breeding and awoken social conscience are doing all they can to reign in the base and backward impulses of those masses, primarily by telling us what the masses really do think. One of their proofs is the fact Bob Woodard’s book, “Fear” has reached Best Seller status. Here, proof, that millions want to read and know the truth, millions support ending this national tragedy that is this Presidency. Bob Woodward is a hero.
    The problem is reality. As in, they have lost touch with it, if they ever even knew what it was. They still can’t accept their evolved, progressive and utopian world view is not being joyously embraced and triumphantly implemented. They seem to be operating under the assumption that they didn’t get their message out, they didn’t properly convey that only the worst sorts, and a small minority of the worst sorts, would other than wholeheartedly embrace their view.

    Hence, the daily outrage du jour. Hence, the daily howler monkey carnival act screeching about the latest horror from this administration. The fault of course lies squarely and wholly on the shoulders of those savages whose basest instincts were ignited by the hateful rhetoric of this mistake, this national disgrace, this President. Sure, maybe there is a smidgen of blame for them to own in that they didn’t sufficiently get the message out, but how can it be the fault of a lion tamer when the lion decides to bite the whip, or the arm wielding it, instead of sitting pretty?
    It is not their fault the lion is a wild animal, only acting on it’s nature. The proof there is, the lions that have been hand-raised since birth, that have had their natures wholly suppressed, don’t ever bite. In other words, lions that are no longer lions. They are some domesticated quasi-pet that can’t ever be fully trusted and therefore must always be constrained, caged and managed, but displaying them and making them dance to the whip is proof their methods are right.

    Today, however, something happened that none of them could have anticipated. Today, the masses spoke in a way none could have predicted. “Fear” has been knocked from the top spot of Barnes & Noble’s Best Seller list. The Amazon site has been crashed by the influx of orders for another tome. What is this book? Is it another scathing, scatological, scintillating tell-all, exposing the heinousness of this President or this administration?

    Actually, no. The book that has taken the number one, most purchased spot on Barnes & Noble, that has caused the Amazon link to crash under the weight of interest, won’t be released until November 13, 2018. The book is the author’s first offering, though part of her ability to become published is because of a famous relative. The author is Peggy Rowe, mother of blue collar hero Mike Rowe, of “Dirty Jobs”, “MikeRoweWorks Foundation” and “Returning The Favor” fame.

    The book is a memoir, “About My Mother – True Stories of a Horse-Crazy Daughter and Her Baseball-Obsessed Mother”. It is a collection of stories about Peggy Rowe’s mother. And about life. It is a book about love. Family. Hope. Laughter. All set in a uniquely American landscape, a landscape we are told by our betters that is not better. A less evolved landscape, according to those who are more evolved. And yet. Fully two months before it is released, it has replaced “Fear” as the most purchased book on the sites of the two biggest sellers of books in the land.

    There is a lesson here for those who are more evolved, more enlightened, more progressive, that only you can see from your elevated perch. That lesson is simply, the brightness of the future you are hurtling towards, the journey on which you insist we all join is the reflection of the sun off the macadam you are plunging towards, hopefully at breakneck – literally – speed.

    For those who do the Book of Faces, I highly recommend checking out the following link.
    https://www.facebook.com/TheRealMikeRowe/videos/924465271079780/

    I’ll also recommend finding out more about “Returning The Favor”,
    https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7311010/ as well as “Returning The Favor Effect”, http://mikerowe.com/2018/05/well-be-back-post-ideas-to-returning-the-favor-effect/, as well as on the Book of Faces for your daily antidote to the meanness andvileness flooding the internet. Here, Americans post links and stories about “Bloody Do-Gooders” in Mike Rowe’s words, who are making the world a better place, all across the land.

    While on MikeRowe.com, be sure to check out Peggy’s blogs. Reading those shows his apple didn’t fall far from his tree. Who’d a thunk it? The character of a family influences that of its progeny more than the cultural milieu, or in some cases, in spite of it. Maybe it does take a village, but the people in that village are what counts.