Category: Foreign Policy

  • Republicans Keep Cheney Impeachment Bill Alive

    Knowing that any bill fronted by Dennis Kucinich can only make the Democrats look stupid by association, the House Republicans today stopped Democrats from killing the bill. Congressman John Shadegg (R-AZ) was credited with the idea. USA Today Blog has a play by play of the action. The Bill is H Res 333, Sponsored by little Dennis and co-sponsored by the 22 (other) biggest kooks in Washington, Sheila Jackson Lee, Maxine Waters,etc and outright traitor Jim McDermott, this bill quotes the Vice President’s comments about Saddam’s possession of WMD’s. Yeah, still singing that old song. Gee, if only Al Gore or Bill Clinton had said something about that…
    Shadegg’s plan to help the democrat’s look stupid by keeping one of their idiotic bills highlighted is just brilliant. Someone buy that man a beer!

  • President Bush Tries Again to Convince Democrats That We Are at War.

    President Bush compared Congress’ Democratic leaders Thursday with people who ignored the rise of Lenin and Hitler early in the last century, saying “the world paid a terrible price” then and risks similar consequences for inaction today.

    Bush accused Congress of stalling important pieces of the fight to prevent new terrorist attacks by: dragging out and possibly jeopardizing confirmation of Michael Mukasey as attorney general, a key part of his national security team; failing to act on a bill governing eavesdropping on terrorist suspects; and moving too slowly to approve spending measures for the Iraq war, Pentagon and veterans programs.

    “Unfortunately, on too many issues, some in Congress are behaving as if America is not at war,” Bush said during a speech at the Heritage Foundation. “This is no time for Congress to weaken the Department of Justice by denying it a strong and effective leader. … It’s no time for Congress to weaken our ability to intercept information from terrorists about potential attacks on the United States of America. And this is no time for Congress to hold back vital funding for our troops as they fight al-Qaida terrorists and radicals in Afghanistan and Iraq.”

    Sadly, they still won’t get it. It is childish, really, to not believe something, because to do so would force you to change your position on it. The Democrats, by being so enamored of polling, (kook) bloggers and mostly the vast sums of money churned up by liberal 527’s such as MoveOn.Org, have ceased any actual work in favor of the pretense of work and the idea that their ideas, (global warming, open borders, free this, free that) will make the world better. Well folks, I hate to tell you, but The Road to Hell was paved with good intentions. 9-11 came about because while Al Qaeda was at war with us, we refused to acknowledge it. Clinton’s handling of the Khobar Towers, the 93 WTC bombing and other acts of terrorism as criminal acts rather than as the acts of war that they are weakened the country. From the Church Commission to Gorelick’s wall, the democratic party has continually weakened the United States’ ability to defend ourselves and our allies. I can only hope the voters figure this out before it is too late.

  • Islamic Republic dismisses chance of an US airstrike

    AP reports that the Islamic Republic dismisses any chance of a US airstrike against Islamic Republic nuclear facilities or the Qods Forces;

    The head of Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards dismissed the possibility of a U.S. military action against Iran and warned that his forces would respond with an “even more decisive” strike if attacked, an Iranian news agency reported Friday.
     
    The comments by Gen. Mohammad Ali Jafari came after the United States announced sweeping new sanctions against Iran focusing on the Revolutionary Guards, a force that is tasked with protecting Iran’s Islamic government and reports to the country’s supreme leader.

    CNN reports that the Iranian foreign ministry called the Bush Administration’s latest sanctions “doomed”;

    An Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman also said sanctions were “doomed to fail,” calling them “worthless and ineffective” and criticizing the U.S. for pursuing confrontational policies.

    Yeah, how far down the third world food chain can you go?  

    Meanwhile, speaking Thursday in Kuwait, Iranian Interior Minister Mostafa Pour-Mohammadi warned that any military attack on Iran would be met with a “crushing response.” 

    I hope my friend Kamangir won’t mind if I steal more of his pictures today to illustrate the Islamic Republic’s idea of “more decisive strikes” and “crushing response”;

    306825_orig.jpg

    Anyone else think these guys look a little too old and too fat to be called part of a decisive strike? I guess when your revolution ages 30 years, so do it’s soldiers.

    And I don’t think anyone is too worried about being hit by a “Retard Missile”;

    19_8607030607_L600.jpg

    Maybe the Islamic Republic should remind themselves of what used to stand on this knoll in Syria before they start talking smack (photo from Sweetness and Light);

    weapons_600_2.jpg

    Kamangir also writes that the Islamic Republic may have found a new ally to help them build their nuclear arsenal;

    Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Store has urged the West to dismantle their nuclear arsenals instead of exerting pressure on Iran.

    That almost makes sense – in fact why don’t we just hand over our weapons to the Islamic Republic, the same way the KosKids think we should all just convert to Islam (from HotAir). 

    Update: Kamangir just emailed me that the Islamic Republic news agency reporting of the Norwegian Foreign Minister was probably tampered with at it’s source. The line I quoted above doesn’t appear in the orginal transcript of the Norwegian’s remarks.

  • Iran sanctions

    Pamela at Atlas Shrugs writes that the New York Times leaked news of the Bush Administration’s impending sanctions against the Iranian Quds Force this morning;

    The Bush administration will announce new sanctions against Iran on Thursday, accusing the elite Quds division of the Revolutionary Guard Corps of supporting terrorism, administration officials said Wednesday. The administration also plans to accuse the entire Revolutionary Guard Corps of proliferating weapons of mass destruction. Both designations will put into play unilateral sanctions intended to impede the Revolutionary Guard and those who do business with it.  

    The Wall Street Journal’s Glenn Simpson writes;

    The sanctions hit Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards Corps along with eight affiliated companies and five Guards officials and the elite Quds Force unit of the Guards, which was accused of backing the Taliban in Afghanistan and were designated proliferators of weapons of mass destruction and ballistic-missile technology. Also targeted are Iran’s defense ministry logistics unit, three officials in its ballistic-missile program, and two additional state-run banks.

    Of course, the reaction from the Left is predictable.

    At The Weekly Standard Blogs, Brian Faughnan writes that MoveOn hopes Iran can be trusted with nukes. It seems that MoveOn is trying to pre-empt a war with Iran because the president is “reckless” Brian reprints the whole solicitation letter. Yeah, it must be Bush’s fault if we go to war with Iran.

    So to help illustrate what a peaceful friend Iran is to us, I lifted this photo from my friend Kamangir; it’s a picture of a miltary academy graduation ceremony in Iran;

    306238_orig.jpg

    It’s a formation of soldiers – one group is marching in the form of the US flag (which has a swastika on it for some reason) and the other group is in the form of a scimitar piercing the US flag. That’s a peaceful image, isn’t it?

    Then Solomonia has posted one of Ahmadinjad’s speeches from October 6th;

    …An incident occurred on September 11, and look what they did afterwards. They used this pretext to occupy Afghanistan and Iraq, they killed dozens of thousands of peoples, and they want to continue to kill. They are creating another incident like the Holocaust. We advise them not to create something sacred, not to fabricate another sacred lie, and to allow a group of truth-seekers to get to the bottom of things, to identify and expose those behind it, and get it over with.

    Got that? An incident on 9-11. And we used it as an excuse to occupy Iraq and Afghanistan. For what? Their abundance of sand and goats?

    Lew Rockwell says the Qods Force is just like US Navy Seals – so why are we pickin’ on ’em? Yeah, just like SEALS, Lew – except the folks that our SEALs kill have all contributed or plan on contributing to the deaths of innocent people.

    And Maureen Dowd is wondering will crazy Cheney get his war with Iran;

    He may have lost his buddy in belligerence, Rummy. He may have tapped out the military in Iraq. He may not be able to persuade Congress so easily anymore — except for Hillary — to issue warlike resolutions. He can’t cow Condi into supporting his bullying as he once did, and Bob Gates is doing his best to instill some common sense.

    Besides, Cheney is running out of time to wreak global havoc; he’s working for a president who is spending his waning days on the job trying to prevent children from getting health insurance.

    I’m wondering if Crazy Maureen will ever win her fight with reality or common sense. “Wreak global havoc” – that’s a level of paranoia right out of a James Bond movie…or Get Smart.

    I guess the Left is still in denial that we’ve been at war with Iran for thirty years now – and we’re the only ones acting like we don’t know it.

  • Burmese live in climate of fear (Updated)

    The Bush Administration today published laws restricting assets of some members of the Myanmar government;

    In response to the Government of Burma’s continued repression
    of the democratic opposition in Burma, and consistent with Executive
    Order 13310 of July 28, 2003 and Executive Order 13448 of October 18,
    2007, this final rule amends the Export Administration Regulations
    (EAR) to move Burma into more restrictive country groupings and impose
    a license requirement for exports, reexports or transfers of most items
    subject to the EAR to persons listed in or designated pursuant to
    Executive Orders 13310 and 13448.

    And the Australian government is “fleshing out” it’s own program of restrictions according to the Australian press;

    Last month, Prime Minister John Howard announced the moves in an effort to convince the military rulers to tone down their hard line against pro-democracy demonstrations.

    Foreign Minister Alexander Downer said the measures would be directed against 418 individuals, made up of members of the Burmese regime, their associates and supporters.

    Those on the list include members of the State Peace and Development Council, their spouses and children, as well as regional commanders and their immediate family.

    Also on the list are deputy regional commanders, government ministers, deputy ministers and their immediate families.Â

    But the Washington Post reports that it’ll probably do little in the short term, since Burmese people live in fear of the Myanmar government;

    But they talk about it only in whispers, looking over their shoulders to see who might be listening. The government has blocked access to several Internet chat and e-mail sites, and people assume their phone conversations are not private, given that the government controls all the country’s telecommunications.

    “The people, we all feel so cramped up inside,” said a 66-year-old man in Rangoon. “We cannot talk. We cannot do anything. This government, they are killers. They have guns, but the people have nothing.” He pulled out a handkerchief and wiped his eyes. “I’m sorry, but I don’t have anyone to talk to about these things.”

    Sounds like a commercial for the Second Amendment.

    Global protests are being planned, specifically targeting Chinese Embassies;

    Demonstrations will take place in 12 cities around the world against Burma’s continuing detention of democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi and other political prisoners.

    Protests are being planned at Chinese embassies, as campaigners say Beijing holds the key to Suu Kyi’s release.

    UPDATE: AP writes that China and Russia have blocked UN sanctions against the Myanmar government;

    China and Russia urged Myanmar’s military rulers to talk with the country’s opposition but said Wednesday that they opposed any U.N. sanctions against the junta.
    Â
    The two veto-wielding countries on the U.N. Security Council say Myanmar’s crushing of pro-democracy protests led by Buddhist monks was an internal issue, a position that has prevented discussions of sanctions.

    Foreign Ministers Yang Jiechi of China and Sergey Lavrov of Russia said at a meeting with India’s Pranab Mukherjee that, instead of punishment, they support efforts by U.N. special envoy Ibrahim Gambari to open talks between the opposition and the ruling generals.

  • Bush unilaterally puts pressure on Myanmar junta

     

    Photo from White House

    Since the UN has been typically lethargic in regards to taking action against the repressive government in Burma, President Bush has taken steps to tighten the screws according to Sean Langrell of the Washington Times;

    “The world has also been horrified by the response of Burma’s military junta,” Mr. Bush said. “Monks have been beaten and killed; thousands of pro-democracy protesters have been arrested.”

    Mr. Bush ordered the Treasury Department to freeze the financial assets of members of the repressive military junta. He also acted to tighten controls on U.S. exports to Burma, also known as Myanmar.
    […]the Treasury Department last month designated 14 top leaders of the Burmese regime for sanctions, including Senior Gen. Than She and his deputy, Vice Senior Gen. Maung Aye. The State Department also imposed an expanded visa ban on those responsible for the most egregious violations of human rights, as well as their family members.

    Mr. Bush said yesterday the Treasury Department had designated 11 more leaders of the junta for sanctions, and issued a new executive order that designates an additional 12 individuals and entities for sanctions.

    From the transcript of President Bush’s address on the White House website;

    Burmese authorities claim they desire reconciliation. Well, they need to match those words with actions. A good way to start would be to provide the International Committee of the Red Cross and other humanitarian organizations access to political prisoners; to allow Aung San Suu Kyi and other detained leaders to communicate with one another; and to permit U.N. Special Envoy Gambari to enter their country immediately. And ultimately, reconciliation requires that Burmese authorities release all political prisoners — and begin negotiations with the democratic opposition under the auspices of the United Nations. 

    The Executive Order is especially broad in it’s scope;

    Section 1.* * *all property and interests in property of the following persons that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of United States persons, including their overseas branches, are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:

    (b)  any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, after consultation with the Secretary of State:

    […]

    (iv)  to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, logistical, or technical support for, or goods or services in support of, the Government of Burma, the State Peace and Development Council of Burma, the Union Solidarity and Development Association of Burma, any successor entity to any of the foregoing, any senior official of any of the foregoing, or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to Executive Order 13310 or section 1(b)(i)-(v) of this order;   

    It appears that anyone doing business with the Myanmar government will be subject to this as well – including Chinese, Indians and Russians caught doing business with the junta, as well as Americans doing business with the generals.

    In reaction, the Myanmar government has lifted it’s curfew and assembly ban, according to the Associated Press;

    Myanmar announced Saturday that it was lifting a curfew and ending a ban on assembly imposed after a crackdown on pro-democracy protesters, the latest sign that the government believes it has extinguished the largest demonstrations in decades.
     
    The announcement, made by government vehicles passing through neighborhoods, lifts the curfew that had been imposed at one point from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. and ends the ban on gatherings of more than five people in Yangon.

    The ruling junta on Saturday also issued an unusual plea in state media for the country’s detained opposition leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, to compromise and hold talks with the government.

    The apparent softening of the government’s position comes after President Bush’s announcement Friday that new sanctions would be imposed to punish the military-run government and its backers for the deadly crackdown.

    The situation appears to be worse than has been reported, according to Christian Today;

    Between Jan. 12 and July 31, Burma’s leaders arbitrarily seized property and assets, and forced people to relocate across the country, especially from areas where ethnic Karen rebels dwell in the rugged mountains along Burma’s eastern border with Thailand, the report said.

    It estimated 540,000 people have been displaced in eastern Burma with “minimal” prospects of being returned and resettled. As of July 9, there were 139,075 refugees from Burma living in Thailand, it said.

    “Military operations in rural areas have contributed to the impoverishment of villagers,” he said in the report.

    Pinheiro, a Geneva-based Brazilian law professor who reports to the U.N. Human Rights Council, has visited Burma six times since he was asked to keep an eye on its human rights performance in 2000.

    Pinheiro has not been allowed back since November 2003 despite repeated requests. He based his 2007 report on “information collected from a variety of independent and reliable sources.”

    So the UN Commission is just neutered when it comes to protecting the Burmese people because the goverment won’t cooperate. Another instance of why the US acts unilaterally in the world. It’s an uphill struggle against the evil forces in the world, according to ABC News;

    But the impact of the sanctions has been weakened by the eagerness of China, India and Thailand to tap Burma’s rich natural wealth to fuel their own growing economies.

    But we still expect the UN to do things about more complicated problems in Darfur and Iran.

    Have Coffee Will Write has a link roundup from sources outside the US.  The Tricycle Blog was reporting more arrests yesterday. Kate at A Columbo-Americana’s Perspective has links to the Wednesday testimony to Congress on Burma. Spanish Pundit reports widespread hunger in Burma. Lim Kit Siang advocates for Burma’s removal from ASEAN;

    It is not enough for any ASEAN nation to say that ASEAN backs the United Nation efforts and urges Myanmar to co-operate with Gambari and the United Nations to find a political solution.

    There is not much optimism that Gambari will succeed in achieving a breakthrough with the Myanmar military junta, as evidenced by the continuing campaign of arrests and terror in Myanmar while Gambari continued to call for talks, unless all important players – especially China, India, ASEAN and the UN – do more.

    Maybe US pressure on ASEAN will bump the junta into doing more than just lifting civil rights violations against the people. The UN ain’t helping.

  • Genocide condemnation failing

    It turns out that the condemnation of the Turkish genocide perpetrated against Armenians is a “twofer” for Nancy Pelosi. Not only does she get to stroke the weathered hags of Code Pink, but she also has a large Armenian community in her district. She can get the protesters off her lawn if she makes the war more difficult for the Administration and the troops by shutting down air bases and supply routes from Turkey – and pander for votes in her district.

    But apparently, pelosi and her bill are falling on hard times, according to the Washington Examiner’s Susan Ferrechio;

    House Democrats are slowly losing support for a resolution that would label mass killings nine decades ago as genocide committed by Turkey.

    At least 10 sponsors of the measure — eight of them Democrats — have removed their names from the resolution in the past few days following warnings from State Department officials and the Turkish government that its passage would threaten relations between the two allies.

    House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., and Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., whose district is home to an Armenian community, have been leading the fight to pass the resolution.

    Hoyer acknowledged that the waning enthusiasm among members of the House could scotch plans to vote on the resolution any time soon. Initially, Hoyer promised to take up the measure by Nov. 16.

    “There are a lot of people who are revisiting their position,” Hoyer said.

    Six Democrats and one Republican lined up at the clerk’s desk in the well of the House late Monday, waiting their turns to strip their names from the resolution, which would direct the president to recognize the killings as genocide.

    One of the lead sponsors, Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif., said she has decided not to vote for the resolution because it is “highly destabilizing” to the region. She left her name on the measure, though, saying that she thinks genocide was committed but that “Congress acting now is incendiary.”

    With sponsors leaving Pelosi’s ill-considered attempt to defund the war and kill more troops while buying votes, her “twofer” could turn into a “twofer” for Republicans. With the polls showing general dissatisfaction with Congress, pelosi, trying to cut her negatives in half blames the Senate, according to The Hill’s Mike Soraghan and Manu Raju;

    In March, the Speaker celebrated the first 100 days of the congressional majority by stating, “Democrats have brought the winds of change to the Capitol.”

    These days, she’s confined to claiming those winds are blowing on her side of the building. In the minds of her caucus members, the Senate is in the doldrums and House members are paying the price for Senate inaction on Democratic priorities.

    With support dissipating for what should be her easiest piece of legislation to push through the House, Nancy Pelosi is losing her grip on the House. (Washington Examiner)

    Rep. Wally Herger, R-Calif., who removed his name from the resolution Monday, said sponsors like the idea of condemning the killings, “but I think many people now realize we shouldn’t be sticking our finger in the eye of someone who is an ally.”

    Yeah, 90 years after the fact. The Democrats knew that Turkey was upset (Hoyer and Pelosi met with the Turkish Ambassador last Wednesday) and plowed ahead regardless of the sensitive situation.

    My sources tell me that it’s intentional in order to cause a hardship maintaining our troops, and keeping them safe – forcing the administration to withdraw from Iraq. But, until I can dig up some hard paper, it’s has to remain just a rumor. 

    Can you imagine that we live in times in which one party can plot to undermine our war efforts – kill our own soldiers and plot to disintegrate their air cover and resupply – all for a few votes. Regardless of their intentions, Democrats know this bill will have that effect.

    Is there another kinder and gentler definition of traitorous that I don’t know about?

  • Washington Post’s Gang of 12 – the other shoe

    Yesterday, the Washington Post headlined the paper with news that operations in Iraq were working and it seemed that our goals there attainable. That “al Qaeda in Iraq Reported Crippled“. Thinking it odd that Washington post would allow such a thing to be published in their pages, let alone on the front page, I was waiting for the other shoe to drop – and it turns out it was twelve pairs of combat boots.

    This morning we’re greeted on the pages of the Washington Post by the headline “The Real Iraq We Knew” written by 12 former Army Captains. They’re names and times of service in Iraq;

    This column was written by 12 former Army captains: Jason Blindauer served in Babil and Baghdad in 2003 and 2005. Elizabeth Bostwick served in Salah Ad Din and An Najaf in 2004. Jeffrey Bouldin served in Al Anbar, Baghdad and Ninevah in 2006. Jason Bugajski served in Diyala in 2004. Anton Kemps served in Babil and Baghdad in 2003 and 2005. Kristy (Luken) McCormick served in Ninevah in 2003. Luis Carlos Montalván served in Anbar, Baghdad and Nineveh in 2003 and 2005. William Murphy served in Babil and Baghdad in 2003 and 2005. Josh Rizzo served in Baghdad in 2006. William “Jamie” Ruehl served in Nineveh in 2004. Gregg Tharp served in Babil and Baghdad in 2003 and 2005. Gary Williams served in Baghdad in 2003.

    I don’t intend to disparage their service, but I will point out that none have been there since the “surge” started – the latest service listed as “2006” – the “surge” didn’t even begin until November 2006 when troops began arriving and operations didn’t begin until late February 2007.

    The 12 former captains write;

    Against this backdrop, the U.S. military has been trying in vain to hold the country together. Even with “the surge,” we simply do not have enough soldiers and marines to meet the professed goals of clearing areas from insurgent control, holding them securely and building sustainable institutions. Though temporary reinforcing operations in places like Fallujah, An Najaf, Tal Afar, and now Baghdad may brief well on PowerPoint presentations, in practice they just push insurgents to another spot on the map and often strengthen the insurgents’ cause by harassing locals to a point of swayed allegiances. Millions of Iraqis correctly recognize these actions for what they are and vote with their feet — moving within Iraq or leaving the country entirely. Still, our colonels and generals keep holding on to flawed concepts.

    How do they know? They haven’t been there since the surge began – they haven’t heard (apparently) that the Washington Post declared yesterday that al Qaeda is “crippled” and the Mahdi Army has all but disbanded. The “flawed concepts” have all changed since last year – with a new strategy and a new commander.

    Iraq’s institutional infrastructure, too, is sorely wanting. Even if the Iraqis wanted to work together and accept the national identity foisted upon them in 1920s, the ministries do not have enough trained administrators or technicians to coordinate themselves. At the local level, most communities are still controlled by the same autocratic sheiks that ruled under Saddam. There is no reliable postal system. No effective banking system. No registration system to monitor the population and its needs.

    They write that the infrastructure of Iraq is in bad shape – none of that could have improved significantly over the last year? The sheiks are joining the US forces in battling their common enemy al Qaeda – that’s all changed in the last six months.

    If this letter was written a year ago, it might have been more significant – but now, it’s just a recitation of conditions long-ago passed. If this letter were written by 12 Captains currently serving in Iraq, it might be more significant – but these are all FORMER captains, none of whom have been in Iraq for more than a year.

    The main reason conditions were so bad in Iraq last year was because of ill-considered actions by people like the latest “gang of 12” and Congress who’ve been threatening to pull the troops out of Iraq – why should Iraqis commit to a cause when their main protectors (we’re the ones with the guns and the only people they can really trust right now) are always on the verge of abandoning them – especially since we have a history of abandoning people to evil doers around the world in the last half-century.

    President Bush proved, last November, that the Iraqis have his guarentee we’re not going to withdraw during his tenure – despite what the media and the Democrats say. That’s why the Iraqis are suddenly on our side, too. Like I said, this letter is nothing more than 12 former military people vying for jobs with political think tanks – and the left is a more attractive place to find think tank jobs – because you don’t have to think.

    They end their letter calling for a draft as our only way to win. Anyone currently serving on active duty doesn’t want draftees in their units. Period. Who needs a bunch of smelly ex-hippies trying to dodge work and patrols? But, then that should be apparent – given the source of this letter.

    I’ll bet a dollar to a donut, I get all kinds of hits today from those 12 former captains googling their own names. Anyone got a donut they want to lose?

    Uncle Jimbo of Blackfive weighs in, Greyhawk at the MilBlogs says that NCO write better op/eds than captains and the Left is waiting for us to call them “Phony soldiers”. Murdoc Online arrives at my conclusion on the “12 Captains” draft proposal. Confederate Yankee thanks the 12 captains for their history lesson. Curt at Flopping Aces calls the WaPo piece “the dirt which buries our victory”.