Category: Foreign Policy

  • Chavez focuses on what’s important

    r4199006110.jpg

    Photo from Reuters

    Michele Malkin writes this morning that Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is focused on the important issues that affect Venezuelans – like using Spanish words.

    President Hugo Chavez’s government is taking its battle against U.S. “imperialism” into Venezuelans’ vocabulary, urging state phone company workers to eschew English-language business and tech terms that have crept into the local vernacular.

    Meanwhile, Venezuelans on the border with Colombia have less important concerns – like kidnapped family members (Miami Herald link);

    President Hugo Chávez has reveled in praise worldwide for helping secure the release last month of two Colombian hostages held by the FARC guerrillas in the neighboring country.

    But his efforts to free other Colombians from captivity are provoking anger here along Venezuela’s western border with Colombia, where kidnappings of Venezuelan ranchers and businessmen have risen dramatically.

    ”The president says that the guerrillas don’t hold Venezuelans,” said Alejandro García, a municipal official. “The facts say otherwise. We have proof from witnesses, telephone records and [ransom] letters.”

    Cattle growers and their political allies say Colombian rebels hold 16 Venezuelan kidnap victims and complain that Chávez is doing little to win their freedom, despite his sway with the FARC.

    The Devil’s Excrement reports that food shortages in Venezuela are influencing the government to begin issuing ration cards;

    And so it begins. After shortages arising from price controls and the Government’s inefficient intervention into the food distribution chain, the new PDVSA owned PDVAL markets will have what effectively represents the introduction of rationing cards in Venezuela.

    Las Armas de Coronel reports that the Venezuelan oil industry, the main engine of the Venezuelan economy is collapsing. This morning, Venezuela announced an end to food exports (Adelaide Now link);

    VENEZUELA will halt exports of foods such as milk and meat unless domestic demand is met first, the government said today, as leftist president Hugo Chavez struggles with shortages of staple products.

    Venezuelan shoppers have for months faced shortages of basics such as milk and chicken, a problem the government blames on growing demand and hoarding but business leaders say stems from price controls that do not keep pace with high inflation.

    Oh, and bombings of business interests in the capitol probably aren’t very important, either (AP/MSNBC link);

    A small bomb exploded outside the headquarters of Venezuela’s leading business chamber on Sunday, killing one person, police said.

    The blast occurred near the entrance of the Fedecamaras business chamber headquarters in Caracas’s middle-class district of La Florida at approximately 1 a.m. local time (2 a.m. EST), killing an unidentified man and shattering windows, Federal Police Chief Marcos Chavez said.

    “There’s a person who was close by, and presumably could have been hit by the shock wave,” Chavez said in a brief telephone interview. “We still have not identified the person.”

    It probably doesn’t matter that Chavez has threatened businesses represented at the bombed business chamber;

    Government officials have denied that Chavez’s administration was behind previous attacks.

    Last week, Gonzalez strongly criticized Chavez for accusing local businesses of stockpiling products to sell later at inflated prices as Venezuelans struggle with sporadic food shortages.

    Chavez warned recently that any business caught hoarding goods such as chicken, eggs and milk “should be seized and taken under government control” — threats that alarmed Fedecamaras.

    The socialist leader called Empresas Polar — Venezuela’s largest food producer — a “clear example” of the kind of business that is ripe for takeover.

    But, for pete’s sake, please say “raton” instead of “mouse” – after all what’s most important here?

  • Only Democrats can end wars

    You can’t help but giggle whenever you read the Washington Post opinion section these days. Today is no different. John Podesta, Ray Takeyh and Lawrence J. Korb all take turns revising history to make their vacant point that it takes a Democrat to end our wars.

    Even a cursory examination of American history reveals the complexity of concluding a war that has taken on such a stark partisan tint. The shadow of Vietnam looms, as it has become standard Republican narrative that back then it was the Democrats in Congress who stabbed America in the back by cutting off funding for a winning cause. The fact that the war was lost in Southeast Asia, as opposed to the halls of Congress, is no matter. The Republican machine will press this same theme should it lose the White House in November. A Democratic administration would be accused of surrendering to evildoers, as once more the dovish successors of George McGovern are wrongly said to have pulled defeat out of the jaws of victory.

    Um, guys, have you forgotten that it was a Democrat administration that manufactured the Gulf of Tonkin incident that put Marines on the ground in 1965 in the first place? That three years later that administration had to withdraw from the election because they’d managed the war so poorly that they couldn’t win an election. That they’d deceived the American people so badly, Democrats had lost all credibility as well as the next two elections (and five out of the next six elections)?

    In fact, a reasonable person can make a rational argument that Democrats have been responsible for all of our wars from 1860 until 1965 (with the possible exception of the Spanish American War).

    Can you buffoons name ONE American defeat on the field of battle in Southeast Asia? Just ONE. The war was lost on the streets of America and in the halls of the politically-motivated Democrats. Nothing you pinheads can tag-team write will ever change history.

    Just like your mischaracterization of the situation in the Middle East today;

    In today’s Middle East, America is neither liked nor respected. Iran flaunts its nuclear ambitions, confident that a bogged-down Washington has limited options but to concede to its mounting infractions. Afghanistan is rapidly descending into a Taliban-dominated state as the Bush administration responds only with plaintive complaints about NATO’s lack of resolution. And the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is nowhere near resolution. America’s occupation of Iraq is estranging an entire generation of Arab youths, creating a reservoir of antagonism that will take decades to overcome. A Democratic president who may enjoy a modest honeymoon in the Middle East simply by virtue of not being George W. Bush can take a giant step toward reclaiming America’s practical interests and moral standing by leaving Iraq.

    Ya know why we’re not liked nor respected in the Middle East? It’s because of pseudo-intellectuals like you three who are constantly preaching about American hegemony and how we need to understand and talk with leaders in the Middle East. here’s all you need to understand – leaders in the Middle East only respect strength. That’s why Arafat almost broke his neck getting to the negotiation table after the first Gulf War, it’s the reason Jordan is our strongest ally in the Middle East, it’s the reason Gaddafi surrendered his chemical and nuclear weapons programs without a shot being fired.

    Iran is a thorn in our side because they don’t think we have the will to attack them – they get that idea from nimnils like you three.

    Yeah, Democrats can end wars – but the way they end wars brings us to the next war much more quickly. But since Leftists and Democrats have the world view and attention of a fruit fly, that part doesn’t bother them.

    There’ll always be a Republican administration to clean up Democrats’ messes – and Democrats can blame the Republicans for screwing it up like these three imbeciles are doing in this vacuous brain fart on the pages of the Washington Post.

  • Another STUPID Idea from the UN (Your tax dollars at work)

    Bugs! The United Nations thinks everyone should eat BUGS. Why are we funding this thing again?

    To quote Pulp Fiction: Hey, sewer rat may taste like pumpkin pie, but I’d never know ’cause I wouldn’t eat the filthy motherf’r Yes, I know some cultures eat bugs. Some cultures in the past have eaten each other, neither appeals to me.

  • Pakistan targets YouTube

    Unable to defeat al Qaeda operations in their country, Pakistan has decided instead to attack YouTube,  according to the Wall Street Journal;

    Service on Google Inc.’s YouTube site was disrupted around the world for several hours Sunday after a botched effort by the Pakistan government to block access to a video clip critical of Islam.

    The incident, which is still being investigated by YouTube, underscores the vulnerability of the global communications infrastructure. The unusual circumstances surrounding the breakdown also point to the growing role sites like YouTube have played in spreading politically charged content — including in Pakistan, a nation that is already a tinderbox of political tensions.

    The story began unfolding Friday when the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority, the nation’s telecom regulator, ordered Pakistan’s Internet service providers to immediately block access to a specific YouTube video which it said was so incendiary it could trigger riots. A senior official at the authority said it also contacted YouTube, requesting that the site remove the video. The PTA argued the clip was a violation of YouTube’s terms of service, which ban hate speech. YouTube has since removed the clip. The site says it does not comment on reasons for removing specific videos.

    I noticed all of my videos on this site whited out yesterday and I couldn’t get to YouTube to straighten them out – now I know why. The Pakistanis tried to use a sledge hammer to fix a watch.

    Maybe instead of trying to censor the whole world’s viewing of free videos, the Pakistanis should take a little time and explain to their people that rioting over every little thing is bad for their image.

    islamic_rage_boy.jpg

  • ElBaradei carrying Islamic Republic’s water

    Sometimes its enough to make a reader go cross-eyed trying to follow ElBaradei’s International Atomic Energy Agency and their seemingly useless reports on the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program. Like report issued Friday (UPI link);

    International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Mohamed ElBaradei is calling for more documents from Iran to assure its nuclear activities are peaceful.

    In a report on nuclear safeguards in Iran released only to the IAEA board of governors, ElBaradei called on Iran to suspend its nuclear enrichment-related activities and provide additional documents to prove enrichment activities are for peaceful objectives, IAEA reported.

    “As a result of Iran running an undeclared nuclear program for almost two decades, there has been confidence deficit on the part of the international community about the intentions (and) future intentions of Iran’s nuclear program,” ElBaradei said in a statement.

    “Therefore the (U.N.) Security Council asked Iran to suspend its enrichment-related activities. I hope that Iran will continue to work closely with the Security Council, to create the conditions for Iran and the international community to engage in comprehensive negotiation that would lead to a durable solution.”

    So Iran reads this report and then trumpets that they have succeeded in pulling the wool over the world’s eyes once again (IRNA link);

     The 11-page report said that the agency has “made good progress in clarifying the outstanding issues that had to do with Iran’s past nuclear activities.

    “We have managed to clarify all the remaining outstanding issues, which is the scope and nature of Iran’s enrichment program,” ElBaradei added.

    He stressed in the report that in connection with the alleged weaponization studies, the agency has “not seen any indication that these studies were linked to nuclear material.”

    Citing ElBaradei’s report, Aqazadeh said the file will no longer remain at the IAEA’s agenda and the agency would monitor Iran as routine work.

    But, this morning’s Wall Street Journal tells a different story about Nobel Laureate ElBaradei and his mechanizations as head of that agency;

     The report represents Mr. ElBaradei’s best effort to whitewash Tehran’s record. Earlier this month, on Iranian television, he made clear his purpose, announcing that he expected “the issue would be solved this year.” And if doing so required that he do battle against the IAEA’s technical experts, reverse previous conclusions about suspect programs, and allow designees of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad an unprecedented role in crafting a “work plan” that would allow the regime to receive a cleaner bill of health from the IAEA — so be it.

    Mr. ElBaradei’s report culminates a career of freelancing and fecklessness which has crippled the reputation of the organization he directs. He has used his Nobel Prize to cultivate an image of a technocratic lawyer interested in peace and justice and above politics. In reality, he is a deeply political figure, animated by antipathy for the West and for Israel on what has increasingly become a single-minded crusade to rescue favored regimes from charges of proliferation.

    Mr. ElBaradei assumed the directorship on Dec. 1, 1997. On his watch, but undetected by his agency, Iran constructed its covert enrichment facilities and, according to the 2007 U.S. National Intelligence Estimate, engaged in covert nuclear-weapons design. India and Pakistan detonated nuclear devices. A.Q. Khan, the Pakistani nuclear godfather, exported nuclear technology around the world.

    In 2003, Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi confessed to an undetected weapons effort. Mr. ElBaradei’s response? He rebuked the U.S. and U.K. for bypassing him. When Israel recently destroyed what many believe was a secret (also undetected) nuclear facility in Syria, Mr. ElBaradei told the New Yorker’s Seymour Hersh that it is “unlikely that this building was a nuclear facility,” although his agency has not physically investigated the site.

    The IAEA’s mission is to verify that “States comply with their commitments, under the Non-Proliferation Treaty and other non-proliferation agreements, to use nuclear material and facilities only for peaceful purposes.” Yet in 2004 Mr. ElBaradei wrote in the New York Times that, “We must abandon the unworkable notion that it is morally reprehensible for some countries to pursue weapons of mass destruction, yet morally acceptable for others to rely on them for security.”

    So, ElBaradei sees a nuclear-armed Islamic Republic as a counter balance to a nuclear-armed Israel in the region. Will the Nobel Committee revoke his prize when the missiles rain down on Tel Aviv?

  • Fidel Castro resigns

    The corpse of Fidel Castro apparently resigned this morning (Fox News link);

    The end of Castro’s rule — the longest in the world for a head of government — frees his 76-year-old brother Raul to implement reforms he has hinted at since taking over as acting president when Fidel Castro fell ill in July 2006. U.S. President George W. Bush said he hopes the resignation signals the beginning of a democratic transition.

    From Ziva at Babalu Blog the quote from the announcement;

    To my dearest compatriots, who have recently honored me so much by electing me a member of the Parliament where so many agreements should be adopted of utmost importance to the destiny of our Revolution, I am saying that I will neither aspire to nor accept, I repeat, I will neither aspire to nor accept the positions of President of the State Council and Commander in Chief.

    Castrozombie
    Photo from Babalu Blog

    Hopes are high here in this household for the Cuban people, but expectations are low.

    From his resignation letter; My wishes have always been to discharge my duties to my last breath. That’s all I can offer.

    Cambio no esta completo todavia!

  • Drivel roundup

    There’s just too much absurdity going on in the world for you to have to surf looking for it, so I’ve rounded up much of it for you tonight;

    An Old Broad’s Ramblings and Bob’s Blog have the video of some guy who obviously knows something the rest of us should know – otherwise, why would he admit to it? But then again – who knows these days?

    Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs has links to the stories of the latest in eight nights of violence in Denmark in expressions of false outrage.

    Drew M. at Ace of Spades and Brennan at the American Pundit both think that maybe Michele Obama is a little too self-centered to be comparing what is happening in her life today to what the rest of us were doing before she and her suit model came along.

    Bloodthirsty Liberal writes that village elders are outraged when women voters start voting at the women-only voting station.

    At Big Dog’s Weblog, Bill Clinton gives a lesson on “telling the truth”.

    Robin at Chickenhawk Express writes that a documentary is due out from PBS and Frontline on the Haditha incident. Speaking of Haditha, Redstate and Michele Malkin are looking for pigsuit wearers to show up at a Murtha payoff dinner in Pentagon City (I’d go if I can get a timeframe).

    Crotchety Old Bastard points us to the American Thinker‘s Ari Kaufman’s indisputable worst presidents list.

    Somehow, Kosovo independence invokes “down with America” chants according to Gateway Pundit.

    Jammie Wearing Fool reports 66,000% inflation in Zimbabwe. What did they expect with a Friend of Carter for president?

    Liberty Pundit found all you loser Patriot fans championship hats and shirts.

    Little Green Footballs reports on the Muslim Flat Earth Society.

    VanHelsing at Moonbattery writes that Brits have discovered the key to a successful socialized healthcare system – more ambulances and bigger parking lots.

    Bob Parks at Outside the Wire writes about former conservative Charles Barkley’s swipe at Christians.

    Sister Toldjah has all the relevant links for Obama/Che flag controversy while DUmmie FUnnies chronicles the KosKids stroking each other over how this won’t affect Obama. Spree writes that McCain leads Clinton and Obama in Florida. This could get interesting.

  • Chavez, Nestle, Exxon; milk and oil politics

    2008_02_10t233956_368x450_us_venezuela_food.jpg

    Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez visits a rice plant during his weekly Alo Presidente broadcast in Barinas, 525km (326 miles) from Caracas, February 10, 2008.

    Photo from Reuters

    Last week, Exxon Mobil convinced a British court to freeze about $12 billion of assets belonging to Venezuela’s state-owned oil company Petroleos de Venezuela SA in Exxon’s case against Venezuela for seizing the company’s property. So of, course, because an international company, backed by a British court froze Venezuela’s money in foreign banks, Chavez blames the United States and threatens to cut off oil to the US (Breitbart link);

    Chavez has repeatedly threatened to cut off oil shipments to the United States, which is Venezuela’s No. 1 client, if Washington tries to oust him. Chavez’s warnings on Sunday appeared to extend that threat to attempts by oil companies to challenge his government’s nationalization drive through lawsuits.

    “I speak to the U.S. empire, because that’s the master: continue and you will see that we won’t sent one drop of oil to the empire of the United States,” Chavez said Sunday.

    “The outlaws of Exxon Mobil will never again rob us,” Chavez said, accusing the Irving, Texas-based oil company of acting in concert with Washington.

    Anyone with a bit of common sense, and not suffering from Bush Derangement Syndrome, would recognize that Exxon-Mobil’s moves are purely in their interests. But, Chavez suffers from BDS like no one else. I guess it’s that coca-chewing that makes him a bit paranoid. But Miguel at The Devil’s Excrement writes that this seizure should be no surprise to the chavistas;

    The truth is that not only did Chavez illegally take over ExxonMobil’s investment in Venezuela, but has yet to compensate that company. Moreover, the whole thing has been badly handled in the belief that ExxonMobil will simply accept whatever PDVSA offered, like the state controlled oil companies of Norway and France did with their own project.

    In fact, Chavez should have known that these injunctions were requested by ExxonMobil as far back as December, a fact that was hidden from the Venezuelan people. At least in the case of the US Court, ExxonMobil introduced the injunction in the Souhern District of New York on December 27th. and that same day Judge Batts ruled on the case, filed under number 07-CV-11590 and ordered PDVSA’s property attached. Moreover, the Judge ratified the measures on January 2nd and again on Jan. 8th. after talking to PDVSA’s lawyers. It was not until January 24th. that PDVSA’s lawyers actually replied to the injunction in the US.

    Not learning that messing with an international company has drawbacks, Chevez went on to threaten to seize Parmalat and Nestle milk plants. After freezing milk prices last year, it became more attractive to Venezuelan milk producers to export their milk to Columbia when they began going broke. So to in an attempt to stem the milk shortages in Venezuela, Chavez instead of letting the market make up shortfalls, blames foreign entities (Financial Times/Reuters link);

    “If, for example, Nestlé or Parmalat … show that through various economic mechanisms, or through pressure, they are taking the product and leaving state or cooperative plants without the necessary milk … then we have to apply the constitution and we have to intervene and expropriate the plants,” he said.

    Mr Chávez frequently issues conditional threats against the private sector without following through on them. But last year, he nationalised swaths of the economy, including the oil and utility sectors, in a drive to build a socialist state.

    In an OPEC country flush from an oil price bonanza, even Chávez supporters are angry at bare shelves and long lines in supermarkets. There have been shortages of products like sugar, eggs and meat, but especially milk.

    Of course, he has a hard time avoiding hyperbole when Chavez is on a paranoid tear (AP link);

    If companies ensure a supply through “blackmail, offering money up front” while leaving state-run plants without enough milk, “that’s called sabotage,” Chavez said. He added that in such cases, “the plants must be taken over and expropriated.”

    Sabotage would more closely describe what Chavez has done to the Venezuelan people and what should be a booming economy is light of oil prices. Since Venezuela supplies 12% of our oil, it would certainly impact us in the short term, however, somewhat less than what Chavez implies.

    Miguel (The Devil’s Excrement link above), unusually accurate in his predictions about the Venezuelan economy, thinks that it will hurt Venezuelans more than the US;

    This will create more financial problems in Venezuela than anywhere else, where shortages are already present and the population is tired of promises and inefficiencies. Thus, if Chavez dared to do it, it will likely become a defining moment in his demise, as people have put up with his rants and ideology because there were unrealized promises attached to them. But somehow it seems this is the wrong time to ask the people to sacrifice in the name of his revolution.

    The ExxonMobil injunctions would only become significant if Chavez were to take the “nutty” road, as I suggested the first day I heard about them, such a road will only be bad for us Venezuelans but I still believe there is a very low probability that Chavez will take it.

    Albert de la Cruz at Babalu Blog agrees;

    I am sure it will be much harder on the US losing it’s 4th oil importer than it will be on Venezuela losing its #1 customer. At least by chimp logic it is.