Category: Economy

  • Where’s the stimulating part of the stimulus?

    As the president signed his stimulus bill yesterday, the stock market tumbled to new lows;

    CNN marveled at the fall, claiming that the shrinking value in the market was “despite” the stimulus bill – I guess it didn’t occur to them that the tumble was BECAUSE of the stimulus bill;

    CNN wonders if maybe the contraction wasn’t because the President didn’t spend enough money.

    The Washington Post takes the same tack;

    The truth is this: The markets’ biggest decline came STARTING on the day Obama was elected because investors (that’s you and I, by the way) have no confidence that Democrats are committed to helping the economy. Their “stimulus” is is actually just buying patronage and votes. They’re doing absolutely nothing for the economy and the country realizes it – no matter how much camouflage the media throws up for him.

    The Obama administration has launched Recovery.Gov where we’re supposed to be able to track our money as it spins down the drain. I’m still trying to figure out what “Protecting the Vulnerable” means and why it’ll cost $81 billion. It sounds to me like it’s to protect vulnerable congressional seats.

  • Bi-partisan my foot

    Apparently Gibbs and Axelrod see that their boss’ stimulus plan is doomed because the went out to tell the world that it was a bi-partisan effort. Bi-partisan because three linguini-spined Republicans voted for it?

    If they thought that it was going to work, they’d be hogging the credit instead of trying to spread the blame. How stupid do they think we are?

  • Feel hustled yet?

    John Kerry says you don’t know how to spend your money;

    Chuckie Schumer says you don’t care about the pork in the stimulus bill;

    Nancy Pelosi beats feet out of town for Europe;

    That promise that Democrats made that you’d get 48 hours to read the stimulus bill? Forget about it.
    But that’s OK, because your Congressman who voted for it didn’t read it either;

    You and your congressman haven’t read it, but the lobbyists have;

    So does anyone else get the feeling that someone is not being completely honest with us?

  • Your tax break? Couples=$13/week

    So now that we’ve had this “stimulus” package crammed down our throats, the media has started dissecting it. A bit too late. The Associated Press looks at the tax break;

    Q: What are some of the tax breaks in the bill?

    A: It includes Obama’s signature “Making Work Pay” tax credit for 95 percent of workers, though negotiators agreed to trim the credit to $400 a year instead of $500 — or $800 for married couples, cut from Obama’s original proposal of $1,000. It would begin showing up in most workers’ paychecks in June as an extra $13 a week in take-home pay, falling to about $8 a week next January.

    So the Democrats couldn’t even leave Obama’s $1000 credit alone, just like they had to give some of my money away last year to someone who doesn’t pay taxes.

    AP says your tax break, if you’re married and file jointly, is a whopping $13/week. But the way I read it, a “tax credit” just knocks $800 off of your taxable income. So if you’re in the 10% tax bracket, your weekly “benefit” is a buck-and-a-half.

    Remember when Tom Daschle criticized the Bush tax cuts because it’d only allow us to buy a car muffler? What will the Obama tax cut pay for in your household? Feeling like you’ve been taken for a ride yet?

    Purple Avenger at Ace of Spades says 77% of you think you can do a better job than Congress on the economy. And 44% think we’d be better off picking random names out of the phone book. As long as it’s not the DC phone book, I might agree.

  • Reality really does bite

    Obama tried to govern with campaign rhetoric. He spent the last few days taking his public plea to the people to pass his “stimulus” bill. Moments before the vote, he sent his Treasury Secretary out to calm the markets. The bill passed and the markets swooned;

    It took moments for the Financial Times to question whether the Obama presidency hasn’t already failed;

    Has Barack Obama’s presidency already failed? In normal times, this would be a ludicrous question. But these are not normal times. They are times of great danger. Today, the new US administration can disown responsibility for its inheritance; tomorrow, it will own it. Today, it can offer solutions; tomorrow it will have become the problem. Today, it is in control of events; tomorrow, events will take control of it. Doing too little is now far riskier than doing too much.

    A juvenile little putz in our own comment section cheered;

    Hooray for democracy!

    In your face assholes!! We won!!!

    Won what? A vote? Just because the president won a vote doesn’t mean he’s off the hook. The plan has to work and apparently the experts don’t think it will work. CBO warned last week that this plan would slow growth over the next ten years, and the campaign-like rhetoric was short on details that the experts need to plan the future of their companies. From the Wall Street Journal;

    Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner promised forceful action to get credit flowing again in the economy, but the lack of detail in his much-anticipated speech helped drive stocks down nearly 5%, the worst selloff since President Barack Obama assumed office.

    From the Washington Times;

    President Obama on Tuesday for the first time staked his fledgling presidency on pulling the country from its economic crisis, promising dispirited Floridians that his stimulus plan will produce tangible results such as jobs and tuition credits or he’ll be ousted from office in 2012.

    Mr. Obama — who earned a small victory when the Senate passed his $838 billion plan but then was hit with a big drop in the stock market — was on the campaign trail again, using a town-hall meeting and one of the best weapons in his arsenal: himself.

    He’ll always draw crowds of acolytes and ass-kissers, even Bill Clinton in his darkest days could do that – but now Obama has to produce, too.

    Even the Washington Post finally admitted their messiah wasn’t wearing any clothes;

    Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner vowed yesterday to bring the “full force” of the U.S. government to battle the financial crisis, assembling an unprecedented coalition of agencies and mustering federal resources on a scale rarely seen except at wartime. But the lack of detail in his plan dismayed lawmakers and investors, triggering a steep sell-off on Wall Street.

    The problem is; the average voter who responds to the pretty rhetoric of the campaign isn’t the same person trying to map out a future for their business or their investments. The reality is that Obama and his staff have always been sparse on details for the purpose of shagging along voters, as long as he said what they wanted to hear, they supported him. However, the rest of us work, live and plan for our futures in the real world where we need details – but as we saw with the stimulus bill, the more details we hear, the less likely we’re going to support Obama’s plans for our money.

    I mentioned a month ago that the campaign is over and it’s time for Obama & Co. to produce results. The president must not have heard me.

  • The party’s over


    That free-wheeling, good time spending you’ve been doing – yeah, that’s over. it’s time for the government to straighten out your life, you buncha incompetent morons;

    Mr. Obama pronounced “in fact, the party now is over” for free-spending Americans, defended his cataclysmic language on the health of the economy and said bipartisanship will have to take a back seat to getting an economic recovery spending bill completed.

    Thank God we’ve got the Obama, otherwise you boobs would have spent your own money for years on stuff you wanted for your own selfish reasons. And quit asking questions about how we’re spending your money.

    Michael Steele‘s response;

    The legislation moving its way through Congress bears little resemblance to what President Obama described at tonight’s press conference. The spending bill written by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid is filled with unnecessary and wasteful programs that will saddle future generations with massive debt. With so many Americans looking for work, it’s important to act quickly, but also act prudently. This bill will fail to have the necessary and direct impact it should – in part – because the Democrats rejected proposals to improve the legislation. The President has called on both parties to work together to solve this crisis; I hope Congressional Democrats will heed his call and listen to all ideas.

    I just saw Steele on FNC ask DNC Chair Kaine why Obama needed Republicans to vote for the pork-laden bill. Steele made the point that the Democrats have the votes they need to pass it without anymore Republicans – so why is Obama making a plea for Republicans to vote for it. Because Democrats want to share the blame when it tanks the economy even more. They want it to look like a bi-partisan failure.

  • Grassroots lobbying

    Obama has apparently pegged his reputation to the passage of this stimulus bill – that’s fine, because when it’s all said and done, he’d better be able to stand the criticism for the failure. But, he’s in Indiana today doing what he does best – campaigning for himself;

    We’ve had a good debate. Now it’s time to act,” Mr. Obama siad. “That’s why I am calling on Congress to pass this bill immediately.

    That’s like saying that “after we have a trial, we’re going to have a good hangin’”, doesn’t it? The media made sure that the only news came out of this was the President’s scare-language. How many have seen the media report the CBO findings that the stimulus will have the effect of slowing growth? Do a Google search – I found it mentioned once somewhere besides the Washington Times. In in one of US News and World Reports blogs.

    It’s almost as if the media wants Obama to fail by letting this bill pass.

    The defeatist language isn’t impressing people either. From Frank Luntz, quoted in the Washington Times;

    “Mr. Hope has to be careful not to become Dr. Doom,” said Frank Luntz[…]

    “The danger for him is using the Jimmy Carter malaise rhetoric, particularly for Mr. Obama, who was elected because people thought he was the solution. There’s only so much negativity they will tolerate from him before they will feel betrayed.”


    The grace of Gerald Ford coupled with Jimmy Carter’s doom and gloom malaise rhetoric – a one-term strategy.

    Added: Video of the noggin knockin’ at Gateway Pundit.
    Count on Treacher to add Benny Hill effects.