Category: Economy

  • Who is paying for Wall Street regs?

    The President recently signed his new Wall Street regulations into effect. Huffington Post cheered Obama’s self-congratulatory words as he put his signature to paper;

    Reveling over a new milestone in his presidency, a triumphant Barack Obama on Wednesday signed into law the most sweeping overhaul of lending and high-finance rules since the Great Depression, adding safeguards for millions of consumers and aiming to restrain Wall Street excesses that could set off a new recession.

    So who is paying for it? Well over the last few months, every investment company which I use, save one, has jacked up my fiduciary fees, which means less of my money is being invested and I’ll have less money when I finally use it.

    I’m not surprised and you can hardly blame those companies, after all they have to pay employees, but this another burden on the economy and another unnecessary burden on tax payers.

    I only mention this because I just got another notice from a company I thought would avoid jacking up my fees and they didn’t.

  • Bush tax cuts haunt Democrats

    According to the Wall Street Journal this morning, the issue of the Bush tax cuts, which expire New year’s Eve, are beginning to divide Democrats. Two more Democrat Senators defected to the side of Republicans seeking to extend the tax cuts at least for taxpayers making less than $250,000/year.

    Sen. Kent Conrad (D., N.D.) said in an interview Wednesday that Congress shouldn’t allow taxes on the wealthy to rise until the economy is on a sounder footing.

    Sen. Ben Nelson (D., Neb.) said through a spokesman that he also supported extending all the expiring tax cuts for now, adding that he wanted to offset the impact on federal deficits as much as possible.

    They are the second and third Senate Democrats to come out publicly in recent days in favor of extending all the tax breaks for the time being. Sen. Evan Bayh (D., Ind.) made similar comments last week.

    Yeah, well, I’ll believe it when I see my pay stub in January. it’s not that I don’t believe Bayh, Nelson and Conrad, it’s just that I don’t believe Harry Reid will ever admit that he was wrong about the Bush tax cuts.

    Here are the current tax rates for a single person;

    And here are the 2000 rates to which your tax rate will return after December;

    Allowing the tax cuts to expire also reduces the $1000/child tax credit to $500, and brings back the marriage penalty. Do Democrats really want to face that discussion in the Fall?

    In addition to Messrs. Conrad, Nelson and Bayh, at least half a dozen House Democrats also have come out publicly in favor of postponing tax increases for higher earners.

    “We’re not creating jobs, and raising taxes now would not be a great idea,” Rep. Michael McMahon, a New York Democrat, said this week.

    Democrats aren’t known for recognizing ideas that are not great. I’d rather see the tax cuts extended than to see Republicans running the Congress – I think that’s what’s best for the country.

  • Shocker: Big Business afraid to spend cash

    Last month I wrote that Big Business is afraid to hire new employees because of the climate Washington has created in the business world. Today, the Washington Post announces that Big Business is sitting on a huge mound of cash – pretty much because of the reasons I mentioned in the earlier post;

    The answer to that question has become a political flash point between the White House and big business groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which held a jobs summit Wednesday and accused the Obama administration of dumping onerous regulations on businesses. That has created an environment of “uncertainty,” which is causing firms to hold back on hiring as the unemployment rate has hovered near 10 percent, the Chamber said.

    The White House countered that companies are wary of hiring not because of new regulations but because they’re still waiting for consumer demand to return. The administration also claimed credit for 3.5 million jobs created by the stimulus bill from last year.

    Big Business is waiting for those taxes to hit on January 1st. They’re also waiting for the new higher healthcare premiums that they’ll have to pay for their employees. And who knows what else will be streaming down the pike when the Democrats lose in November and they only have a month to jam through more anti-prosperity legislation through to the President’s desk.

    As for those three million jobs the White House claims they’ve created, the Wall Street Journal says this;

    This is called a counterfactual: a what would have happened scenario that can’t be refuted. What we do know is what White House economists at the time said would happen if the stimulus didn’t pass. They said the unemployment rate would peak at 9% without the stimulus (there’s your counterfactual) and that with the stimulus the rate would stay at 8% or below. (See the nearby chart.) In other words, today there are 700,000 fewer jobs than Ms. Romer predicted we would have if we had done nothing at all. If this is a job creation success, what does failure look like?

    That’s what I’m thinking.

  • Ouch

    The NASDAQ or S&P 500 doesn’t look any better – trust me. Manufacturing has slowed, as well as home sales. We’re out here on a ledge while Greenspan tells us this is normal and tries to talk us in.

    A year and a half into this administration and they’re telling us that they need more government spending to fix it. More taxes for all working Americans and more debt. More regulation. More uncertainty.

    Me? I’m still plowing my money into stocks – I’m buying cheap shares and it has has to recover sometime in the next 10 years. I hope.

  • Who do they think they’re kidding anymore?

    I’ve kept my mouth shut about unemployment, giving the President the benefit of the doubt – one can only wish the media would do the same sometimes instead of falling on their swords for him. Yes, jobless claims rose AGAIN this week, another 12,000 people on the unemployment line. But the media is calling it “unexpected”;

    New claims for jobless insurance benefits in the United States rose unexpectedly for the second straight week, the government said Thursday on concerns unemployment may derail the economic recovery.

    Claims climbed to 472,000 in the week to June 12, an increase of 12,000 from the previous week’s revised figure of 460,000, the Labor Department said.

    Most economists had expected claims to fall to 450,000.

    You know why God created economists? To make palm readers look accurate in their predictions.

    What can you really expect when employers are worried about the tax coming for their health care plans and coverage. When everyone is expecting their utility bills to jump because of Cap and Tax and the oil spill in the Gulf. When everyone’s income taxes are making a leap in six months. Do you really think that employers are going to hire in a climate like that?

    And, oh, I filed my income taxes in February and still haven’t got my $5000 refund – I wonder what the Hell that’s about. I sure could use that money to pay some contractors to do some work on this house – you know, employ some people.

  • Picking battles

    I nearly choked on my lunch reading the comments on a Yahoo story from Huffington Post about Visa cutting debit card swipe fees in Europe while raising them in the US. First the story;

    Despite a recent study that found swipe fees are stalling the creation of nearly a quarter million U.S. jobs, Visa raised its debit card interchange rate for American retailers to .95 percent plus $.20 per transaction in April, according to the Retail Industry Leaders Association. In contrast, Visa Europe announced Monday that it would be capping transaction fees at 0.2 percent for the next four years.

    A spokesperson for Visa, Inc. said the average Visa Debit transaction fee rose by less than 4 percent.

    “Most of Visa’s U.S. debit rates have not changed,” she said. “Visa, Inc., did recently make a variety of program and interchange modifications to make digital currency even more convenient for consumers and merchants and to facilitate continued growth for Visa and its clients.”

    A 4% increase. Terrible right? OK, so why aren’t Americans getting upset that low income earners are going to pay 50%-100% more in income taxes next year just by the President and Democrats doing nothing to extend the Bush tax cuts? If a 4% increase in the fee they pay at ATMs that don’t belong to their bank gets their panties wadded up, why aren’t more of them marching in the streets to extend the Bush tax cuts?

    Well, here are some of the first comments on the article;
    (more…)

  • Being an Ingrate

    You probably heard the little bit from the President yesterday when he said he expected a “Thank You” for all of the wasteful and unnecessary spending he’s inflicted upon us in the last year or so. Our buddies at No Sheeples Here put together this video to illustrate the problem;

    I’m a single issue voter – besides veterans and defense – and that’s on taxes. I’ll admit that I did good on taxes this year, but only because I paid cash for a new first house and a new car after saving my pennies thanks largely to the Bush tax cuts. Those tax cuts end this year and it’ll hit mostly low income earners who will pay taxes for the first time in ten years. Other low income earners will have their income taxes increase by 50% – from their 10% marginal rates to 15%.

    That is tax increase anyway you look at it. Of course, that paltry $16/month tax break we got last year won’t cushion the income reduction we’ll all feel next year. And the President is somehow “amused” about that.

  • No, just no.

    Ok this is just beyond stupid. The group Rethink Afghanistan trying to get people to send a pre-made message to the White House’s website that acts as a watchdog for Fraud Waste and Abuse.

    That’s why we’re asking you to report the Afghanistan War as an example of waste, fraud and abuse on the White House’s official economic recovery website, Recovery.gov, today. Simply scroll down to the field marked “What” and paste this message into the text box:

    “I’d like to report the waste of billions of dollars of our national wealth in Afghanistan on a war that doesn’t make us safer. It’s fraud to portray this as a war that increases our security, and it’s abusive of U.S. troops and local civilians to drag out this war any longer. End the war so we can have real economic recovery.”

    Really? I mean you really want people to take you seriously trying to pull stunts like this? What about the people that have real issues that need to be looked at. What your doing is encouraging the abuse of government resources wasting time looking at your political spam.

    Also some crazy to go out on.

    Americans only care about healthcare. They have ignored this abuse of power. If we didn’t spend so much on the wars, we’d have enough to pay for our OWN healthcare! We are taxed to death. Paying for these unconstitutional wars and other unconstitutional spending. People are just so stupid! Plus, the cost of caring for all … See Morethe vets with mental and physical repercussions from these illegal wars helps to bankrupt America. People just don’t get it! I’m so mad and frustrated with them!

    No, just…no.