Category: Congress sucks

  • The Peasants are Rioting in Paris….

    The French are rioting over Macron’s increase in the carbon tax.

    https://www.atr.org/french-revolt-against-carbon-tax

    In France, diesel fuel is now at $8.20/gal and gasoline at $9.00/gal. The bulk of the price at the pump here is taxes, not fuel costs. Macron wants to increase the carbon tax in France to $63/tonne. There is no reason for it, other than his personal greed factor. It goes for absolutely nothing other than payola to IPCC and to line his pockets.

    From the article: The loudest and most famous voice from the weekend protest is that of Jacline Mouraud, a diesel owner from Brittany who has become the star of the yellow vest movement due to her YouTube videos and appearance on all major French news outlets.

    “You have persecuted drivers since the day you took office. This will continue for how long?” she said in a YouTube video that has millions of views. “You only need those taxes for new china in the Élysée palace or another expensive swimming pool for your private residence!”

    This seems to be a growing movement in France since 283,000 people in 2,000 locations rioted and burned stuff over it. I’m waiting to see how long it takes Macron to realize that  – well, the French generally hate him. But they voted him in over Marie LePen, and she warned them what would happen.

    The link to WUWT’s article is here: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/12/02/president-macrons-climate-change-fuel-tax-riots-continue-in-paris/

    It also appears that in Paris, some of the rioting is the work of groups closely resembling the antifas here this country. There is much damage in Paris, and Macron is ‘shocked’ about it.  Well, les Crapeaux had a chance to vote in Marine le Pen, but they went for this King of Disconnectedness instead. I wonder if he will offer the peasants cake to eat.

    It is not just in France that this tax-to-death attitude is going on. There is a proposed bill coming up to inflict a $55/ton carbon tax on us, the unsuspecting public.

    I’ve already discussed how a similar tax proposed by IPCC on my gas bill alone would cost me income I simply do not have.  I did the simple math to find out what this carbon so-called tax might cost me, the same as the IPCC’s carbon tax, which was a staggering $21,000 per month by 2030, based on cubic feet of natural gas usage.

    Converting therms to tons was easy enough. There is a site that does that. The result for me was 3.774892954361 tons in January 2018, which is about average for me. My January bill is usually $115 to $120, depending on the weather. The carbon tax is an incremental tax, meaning that it starts low but increases every year for five years to an unconscionable $55/ton, which in my case is $206.14, making my wintertime household gas bill $325.98, an amount that is unaffordable at best, and egregious at its worst.

    This proposed so-called tax is not meant to benefit any of us at the taxpaying end of the economic scale. It will simply go into a massive slush fund with an elaborate title that this bunch of tax-sucking slugs in Congress will be able to dip into at will.

    https://www.atr.org/details-horrible-carbon-tax-bill

    The real anti-growth economic impact for the USA is discussed here:  https://www.atr.org/study-shows-devastating-economic-impacts-carbon-tax

    From ATR:  A carbon tax will not be pro-growth. Most carbon tax scenarios reduce GDP for the entirety of the 22-year forecast period. 

    Better than break-even economic performance may not be possible unless revenue is devoted entirely to corporate tax relief. A lump-sum rebate results in lost GDP equal to between $3.76 trillion and $5.92 trillion over the 22-year forecast period.

    That is trillions, not millions or billions of dollars – trillions lost to this nonsense.

    If you want to drive a thriving economy into a profound economic Depression, you tax the living daylights out of it until it is squeezed dry. Keep raising taxes and before long, there will be no more taxes to be found. We had a revolution in this country a while back because George III imposed a Stamp Tax Act on everything that was printed, to squeeze colonists dry. We fought that, and won.

    Here’s something else that is disturbing: the Bill authorizes armed carbon tax enforcement agents:  The bill authorizes armed carbon tax enforcement agents to collect the new tax on energy used by Americans. As if customs enforcement doesn’t already have enough on its plate, the bill states:

    “The revenues collected under this chapter may be used to supplement appropriations made available in fiscal years 2018 and thereafter –

    “(1) to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in such amounts as are necessary to administer the carbon border fee adjustment.”

    So, if you somehow don’t pay this energy tax into this slush fund, you’ll get arrested???? If it shows up on my gas bill, which is my only source of carbon, men with guns and badges are going to show up on my doorstep demanding money from me? Aside from this looney-tune proposal, this loudly smacks of Gestapo tactics to me.

    The true nature of this proposed tax is discussed at the links, but most egregious is the 2-child limit per household included in the language of the proposal.  Here it is, straight from the bill text:

    “A carbon dividend payment is one pro-rata share for each adult and half a pro-rata share for each child under 19 years old, with a limit of 2 children per household, of amounts available for the month in the Carbon Dividend Trust Fund.”

    The reasoning behind a limit of 2 children per household is not specified, not at all. Because it is poorly written, it can be read as a means of forcing population control on families, which is what the Chinese government has been doing for decades.

    You may want to call Florida Republican Congressman Francis Rooney at 202-225-2536 and ask him why he has signed onto this absurd and harmful Democrat tax proposed by Deutsch, which seeks to impose a tax that is nothing but a feed into a slush fund. You should also call your own Congress critters and tell them to vote against this bill. Or send them e-mails to that effect. And sounding angry about it, in a civilized way, is acceptable. It isn’t a sales tax. It is larceny.

    It is extremely necessary on the part of all of us to be aware of these vultures and give them as much room as possible to expose themselves for what they really are. Without awareness of them and their agenda, we will lose the very things we value most.

     

  • Military to “Build that Wall” if Congress does not fund it.

    Military to “Build that Wall” if Congress does not fund it.

    President Donald Trump said Friday that he’s considering using military resources to finish construction of his long-promised border wall instead of relying on Congress to fund the project through the Homeland Security Department’s budget.

    He also wouldn’t eliminate the possibility of a government shutdown if Democrats continue to confound his efforts to appropriate money for the project on the U.S.-Mexico border.

    ‘We have two options,’ he told DailyMail.com aboard Air Force One as he flew from Billings, Montana to Fargo, North Dakota. ‘We have military, we have homeland security.’

    He was asked specifically about using the Army Corps of Engineers as a taxpayer-funded construction crew.

    The man has been fairly consistent about building this wall.

    “I will build a great wall — and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me –and I’ll build them very inexpensively. I will build a great, great wall on our southern border, and I will make Mexico pay for that wall. Mark my words.”  –  President Trump

    You know, I think the guy just might be serious.  Scuttlebutt is HERE. 

     

     

  • Cohen to Strzok: If I could give you a Purple Heart, I would

    Cohen to Strzok: If I could give you a Purple Heart, I would

    NHSparky sends us a link to Fox News which reports an exchange yesterday between Tennessee Congressman Steve Cohen as he gave FBI agent Peter Strzok a handy in the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Law hearings yesterday;

    “Mr. Strzok, I don’t know where to start,” Cohen said as he started his allotted five minutes. “If I could give you a Purple Heart, I would. You deserve one.”

    A Purple Heart for getting yelled at. I guess that is why Congressmen can’t award Purple Hearts – they would be throwing them from a parade route, if they could.

    From the Tennessean;

    Strzok was subpoenaed last week by the House Judiciary Committee to testify publicly about the text messages he exchanged with Page.

    In a report to Congress released last month, Horowitz said Page wrote to Strzok in a text message, “(Trump’s) not ever going to become president, right?” In response, Strzok wrote, “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”

    Another thing that the FBI can’t do.

    Strzok faced hostile Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, who pointed to his text messages with Page in 2015 and 2016 as evidence of bias in the Russia and Clinton investigations. Strzok and Page were having an extramarital affair at the time they were texting.

    Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, brought up the affair during one of the most heated parts of the hearing, asking Strzok whether he gave his wife the same “innocent” look he was giving Congress members.

    Democrats shouted Gohmert down as Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman, D-N.J., yelled “you need your medication.”

    Strzok angrily replied that Gohmert’s question “goes more to a discussion about your character.”

  • Rep. Tom Suozzi, D-N.Y. suggests 2d Amendment remedy for Trump

    Rep. Tom Suozzi, D-N.Y. suggests 2d Amendment remedy for Trump

    Mick sends a link to Fox News which reports that Representative Tom Suozzi, D-N.Y., in a townhall meeting with his constituents that ther may be a 2d Amendment remedy for President Trump’s policies;

    A New York Democratic congressman is being accused of promoting violence against President Trump after suggesting during a town hall that citizens may have to take up arms against the president if he doesn’t follow the law.

    “I mean, this is where the Second Amendment comes in quite frankly, because you know, what if the president was to ignore the courts? What would you do? What would we do?” Rep. Tom Suozzi, D-N.Y., said during a March 12 Q&A session with constituents in Huntington, on Long Island.

    Well, a 2d Amendment remedy won’t come from recently dis-armed New Yorkers. The legacy governor and his SAFE Act took care of that.

    A spokesperson for Suozzi denied that the congressman was calling for “armed insurrection” against Trump.

    “Taking a page from such great Americans as Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, Congressman Suozzi explained why our founding fathers created the Second Amendment as a way for citizens to fight back against a tyrannical government that does not follow the rule of law,” senior adviser Kim Devlin said in a Monday statement to Fox News.

    Devlin added: “To suggest his comments meant anything else or that he was advocating for an armed insurrection against the existing president is both irresponsible and ridiculous.”

    Well, Mr Devlin, stating that there is a second amendment remedy is advocating an armed insurrection. Language matters.

    Democrats in New York disarmed the citizenry while Democrats controlled the national government, will they now lift restrictions on firearms to take over the Republican government?

    From Roll Call;

    National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman Chris Martin said the video was “incredibly disturbing.”

    “It’s surreal to watch a sitting member of Congress suggest that his constituents should take up arms against the President of the United States,” Martin said.

    Suozzi’s campaign forwarded a line from Thomas Jefferson advocating for such.

    “What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms,” the quote reads.

    Sounds like he’s advocating armed insurrection to me.

  • Cherokee genealogist: none of the evidence supports Warren’s version

    Cherokee genealogist: none of the evidence supports Warren’s version

    The Washington Times reports that Cherokee genealogist Twila Barnes who has researched the story told by Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren about her Indian heritage says none of it adds up;

    Ms. Barnes, who said her research into Ms. Warren’s family found “no evidence” of Native American ancestry, has challenged key elements of the senator’s tale of how her parents, Pauline Reed and Donald Herring, defied his parents by running off to marry.

    “The problem with Warren’s story is that none of the evidence supports it,” said Ms. Barnes in a 2016 post on her Thoughts from Polly’s Granddaughter blog. “Her genealogy shows no indication of Cherokee ancestry. Her parents’ wedding doesn’t resemble an elopement. And additional evidence doesn’t show any indication of her Herring grandparents being Indian haters.”

    Of course, that surprises no one, mostly because Massachusetts Senators have a history of being strangers to the truth.

    While Ms. Warren may genuinely believe the story of her star-crossed parents, Ms. Barnes has argued that the documentation doesn’t back it up.

    She cited the friendship between Grant Herring, Ms. Warren’s paternal grandfather, and Carnall Wheeler, who was listed on the Cherokee Nation roll and mocked in his Virginia Military Institute yearbook as an “aboriginal.”

    Documents show that the two played golf together and that Mr. Wheeler attended a 25th anniversary party for the Herrings in 1936.

    “Clearly, Wheeler experienced some degree of racism in his life due to his being Indian,” said Ms. Barnes. “Despite this, there is one person we know who did not have a problem associating with him — Grant Herring, the grandfather of Elizabeth Warren, the same grandfather she claims was racist against Indians.”

    Of course, in this day and age, folks can be whoever they want to be, just by declaring it’s so despite any documentation. That’s why our Stolen Valor page is chocked full of phonies.

  • Democrats suddenly worried about the troops and spending

    The Washington Examiner reports that four Democrat Senators, Patrick Leahy, Dick Durbin, Jack Reed and Gary Peters, are worried about the cost of Super Troll, President Trump’s planned parade, so they wrote a letter to Secretary of Defense James Mattis expressing their concerns;

    “At a time of war, with American service members serving in harm’s way, such a parade seems to be inappropriate and wasteful,” the senators wrote. “Every penny of the millions of dollars that the parade would cost and every second of the tens of thousands of personnel hours its execution would require, should be devoted to the most essential missions of the Department of Defense — protecting the American people and our security interests.”

    It’s odd that these Senators are suddenly concerned about the health and welfare of servicemembers and national security after they have been trying to slash and burn the Pentagon for years in the form of sequestration. They don’t seem worried about the tens of thousands of man hours wasted on social engineering and things that have little to do with the “most essential missions” of the DoD. Now they want to burden the Pentagon with medical costs associated with transgender recruits.

    Their “every penny” argument rings hollow in the ears of Americans who have watched the Senate raid the surplus of retirees’ Tricare while they jacked up out-of-pocket costs for those same retirees.

    Concern for troops is odd coming from Dick Durban who said they were like Nazi concentration camp guards, a few years back.

  • Guess who else is boycotting the SOTU

    Guess who else is boycotting the SOTU

    71-year-old Democrat Corrine Brown reported to the minimum security prison at the Coleman Federal Correction Complex in central Florida to begin her five year sentence yesterday;

    She was accused of using money from a charity for poor students as a personal slush fund.

    In May, a federal jury convicted her on charges including fraud and lying on her tax returns and on her congressional disclosures.

    Brown is appealing her conviction, saying it was wrong for the trial judge to dismiss a juror who claimed the “Holy Spirit” told him she’s innocent.

  • Corrine Brown sentenced

    Corrine Brown sentenced

    The Washington Post reports that Congresswoman Corrine Brown was sentenced to five years in prison after a jury found her guilty of using her charity like an ATM machine.

    Prosecutors argued that the 71-year-old had turned a charity for poor students into an $800,000 personal slush fund, according to the Associated Press.

    After a nearly 25-year career in Congress, she was convicted in May and could have spent the rest of her life in prison.

    “This is a sad day for everyone,” U.S. District Judge Timothy Corrigan told Brown shortly after sentencing her, according to the Florida Times-Union. “I was impressed with all the outpouring of support for you, and I think it’s a tribute to all the work you’ve done over the years. That’s what makes this all the more tragic.”

    Yeah, tragic. Last year she told the media that feds could have stopped the Orlando gunman from killing all of those people in the Pulse nightclub if they hadn’t been wasting their time investigating her.

    She tried to blame her chief of staff, Elias “Ronnie” Simmons, for bookkeeping errors. He told the court that she had directed him to make the withdrawals from her charity, the money meant to help poor children.

    The swamp drains itself.

    Thanks to Chip for the link.