Category: Antiwar crowd

  • Naw, Paulians aren’t nuts at all

    Streetsweeper sends us a link to the Examiner (Not the Washington Examiner) which tells us about an Adam Kokesh podcast in which our buddy, Adam, reads an email from a fan. Rather than post yet another Adam Kokesh YouTube video, here’s how the reading went from the Examiner;

    “There is a way the nomination can be given to Ron Paul,” the email read by Kokesh said.

    “Romney needs to die,” the letter continued.

    According to the allegedly anonymous 19-year-old author of the email, the idea is more about saving America and innocent lives than ensuring a Paul nomination.

    “I don’t get a lot of emails like this,” Kokesh said, adding that he has been “privileged” to hear “various forms of this proposal put forth.”

    He went on to say that he has never endorsed or suggested such action.

    “But, I cannot deny that the thought hasn’t crossed my mind, as well as so many other libertarians and Ron Paul supporters of late,” he added.

    “Is Romney’s life equal to 500,000 innocent Iranian civilians he wants to kill,” the email asked, calling Romney a “terrorist.”

    The email’s author claimed to be planning a video highlighting the assassination of Romney “and the turn of events it could cause.”

    “The true patriot,” the email added, “would execute the ones who put the Patriot Act into place.”

    Yeah, except that Romney was never in Congress, so he had nothing to do with the Patriot Act.

    Of course, then Kokesh launched into a history lesson for his listener (singular on purpose) about how World War II could have been prevented by assassinating Hitler, because, you know Romney would be like Hitler if he was president and annex Austria. Or something.

    But, I guess the upshot of this is that Ron Paulians are perfectly rational Americans who never vocalize the incessant voices in their head. And they’re not crazy enough to broadcast their compatriots’ idiot emails on the podcast. Because, that would trigger a Secret Service investigation, wouldn’t it? I mean, Romney has a Secret Service detail, right?

  • The court will not throw out charges against Pfc. Bradley Manning.

    It seems that he had asked that all of the charges be thrown out. Needless to say that motion was rejected.

    “The defense motion to dismiss … is denied,” military Judge Colonel Denise Lind said in a pretrial hearing, adding that if prosecutors could not prove in the trial phase that Manning knew intelligence given to WikiLeaks would reach enemy hands, the court would “provide appropriate motions.”

    Manning’s attorney, David Coombs, had pressed the court to dismiss the charge.

    Comparing Manning’s actions to that of a soldier speaking to a major newspaper, he argued that without an intent to provide information to the enemy, Manning’s actions constituted at most negligence.

    The ruling was another blow for Manning, who made several appeals over three days of pretrial hearings this week to reduce or dismiss all 22 charges against him. Those motions were all rejected.

    I would like to know why he is wearing new ASUs? Is this some kind of plan of making him look better in the court? Or the fact that he has only five ribbions and he cannot get them in right order?

    Manning’s alleged motive, as he stated in his online chat logs with a confidant-turned-informant, was “I want people to see the truth.”

    Yea, I really doubt that.

  • Thomas Rick’s Big Idea

    Thomas Ricks of the Center for a New American Security writes in the Washington Post that the all-volunteer military is a thing of the past and we need to go back to the draft. If the Center for a New American Security sounds familiar, it’s because they’re the same numbnuts who started this talk about doing away with 20-year retirement for the military that we talked about almost a year ago. I guess the CNASC has a business plan that calls for one new stupid idea every year. Of course, bringing back the draft is not a new idea, it’s more like the Left clinging to their glory days.

    Ricks’ ill-considered reasoning is that if we still had a draft, the US would be less likely to commit military force where it’s needed;

    Over the past decade, this all-volunteer force has been put to the test and has succeeded, fighting two sustained foreign wars with troops standing up to multiple combat deployments and extreme stress.

    This is precisely the reason it is time to get rid of the all-volunteer force. It has been too successful. Our relatively small and highly adept military has made it all too easy for our nation to go to war — and to ignore the consequences.

    The drawbacks of the all-volunteer force are not military, but political and ethical. One percent of the nation has carried almost all the burden of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, while the rest of us essentially went shopping. When the wars turned sour, we could turn our backs.

    First of all, professional soldiers don’t want a bunch of draftees who we have to babysit for the period of their service. But Thomas Ricks doesn’t know anything about that.

    According to Wiki, Ricks is two days younger than me, but his experience in the military is entirely academic. He has “reported” on the military, he is in the business of criticizing the military, but he has never spent a day in uniform, so basically, he doesn’t know that the impact of his idiot opinions would absolutely destroy the military as it exists today.

    So, Ricks even admits that having a draft didn’t stop Lyndon Johnson from deploying drafted American soldiers to Vietnam, but he likes to give those draftees credit for ending our participation in the war against communists there. Combat forces went to Vietnam in 1965 and it was eight years before the last combat troops left Vietnam.

    Since Ricks called the Iraq War “reckless”, lets’ look at that one and compare it to his reasoning; The US invaded Hussein’s Iraq in 2003 and the last combat troops left Iraq eight years later in 2011. Without a draft. So what’s his point?

    Resuming conscription is the best way to reconnect the people with the armed services. Yes, reestablishing a draft, with all its Vietnam-era connotations, would cause problems for the military, but those could never be as painful and expensive as fighting an unnecessary war in Iraq for almost nine years. A draft would be good for our nation and ultimately for our military.

    Yeah, that’s the same bullshit thing that the Left uses against home-schoolers – that their children aren’t socializing with the public school students who are steeped in liberal bullshit drivel. So the same process should be applied to the military – there should be more idiot hippies in the military to “connect” the military to society. Personally, I’m not all that happy to be connected to society after my service.

    Society is jam-packed with pseudo-intellectuals like Ricks who think I need to be socialized and swallow their idiot opinions whole. I probably would have strangled a whole parcel of hippie draftees if anyone had inflicted those idiots on my platoon.

    The fact that draft didn’t stop Johnson from getting involved in Vietnam should be proof enough for most people, but Ricks is upset that the anti-war movement in this century didn’t get much traction, and he’s flailing around trying to give them some more relevance. He ought to wade into a crowd of college students and preach to them about bringing back the draft. I’ll happily provide the crowd with baseball bats so they can properly address his big idea.

    Thanks to Marine_7002 for the link.

  • AP: Hippies mad because NYPD infiltrated their groups

    Yeah, so surprise, the NYPD infiltrated anti-war groups there during the RNC convention in 2004. It’s not like the police had a reason to keep an eye on them or anything. VVAW plotted to kill politicians and disrupt utilities at the RNC in Miami in 1972…ask Scott “The Assassin” Camil.

  • Jake Diliberto: Ron Paul should run with 3rd Party

    Yeah, I picked this up from our buddy, Jake Diliberto on Facebook. Now ask yourself why would Russia TV and Jake want Ron Paul to run as a third party candidate?

    It is clear to me that the GOP primaries will not go to Ron Paul this year and as a result, President Obama is likely to destroy the GOP in this year’s general election.

    Mainly, the conservative wing, has taken up every issue that would ignite anti conservative flames among young voters, minorities, and independents. In two words, Meghan McCain, daughter of Senator John McCain, identified this year’s primary as, “ so lame”.

    While I wouldn’t dispute McCain’s characterization of the field of candidates, I certainly wouldn’t use that fine looking, but empty-headed twit as the source for my ruminations on politics, but Jake goes on to quote her;

    McCain picks carries on the point saying, “The Republicans need someone to excite younger people, independents, Hispanic voters and the disenfranchised.”

    Yep, Jake, that fits Ron Paul to a tee, doesn’t it? Ron Paul excites young people because he’s so close to their age. I’m sure Hispanics will trip over themselves trying to cast their vote for Paul, because he’s so “with” them on immigration.

    If I were a Ron Paul supporter, and that is certainly NOT the case, I’d be thinking to myself “Ron Paul hasn’t carried more 10% in any primary thus far, unless he was only running against one other candidate, so we should put him on third party ballot”, because mathematics in the Ron Paul world doesn’t exist. 1+0 = 70 gajillion.

    He can’t get a majority in his own party, but we should be able to attract enough votes from the other party to put him in the White House – especially since Democrats are so disillusioned with Barack Obama, or something.

    Apparently, elections mean nothing to these people, only the campaign matters. It’s like that 99% bullshit. Just because they say it, it’s true.

  • London Review of Books: “Lone gunman not the exception”

    Again one thing that is nice about having many different people on Facebook is that I get a broader view of what is being said around the web. In this case comes from the website called London Review of Books. In this article by Tariq Ali called “The Not So Lone Gunman” goes to paint every Solider as another crazy GI gun spree waiting to happen.

    In most colonial wars people are arrested, tortured at random and killed. Not even a façade of legality is considered necessary. The ‘lone’ American gunman who butchered innocents in Afghanistan in the early hours of Sunday morning was far from being an exception. For this is not the act of a deranged maniac killing schoolchildren in an American city. The ‘lone’ killer is a sergeant in the US army. He’s not the first and won’t be the last to kill like this.

    It seems by this being in the US Army is worse then being a deranged maniac killer. Good to know. It gets better.

    The Russian occupation of Afghanistan also witnessed ‘lone gunmen’ behaving in this fashion, but better-educated than many of their US counterparts they would write about the whys and wherefores in anguished diaries after they had been withdrawn

    Yep lets through in the dumb GI meme while we are at it.

    The ‘enemy’ is not hidden. It is the public. So wiping out women and children is part of the war. Helicopter gunships, bomber jets and drones are more effective killers than ‘lone’ gunmen.

    So were we have been conducting a massive kill all women and children campaign since 2001? I thing that anyone that ever did a Combat Air Patrol over Afghanistan would be quick to disagree. But he don’t let reality disprove another baby killer meme. I am not even sure how to respond to the last paragraph outside of profanity. I wonder if anyone here can do any better.

    So what is to be done? Get out now. These wars that dehumanise the ‘enemy’ also dehumanise the citizens of warmongering nations. We are made to live in a state of ignorance, but by our apathy contribute to making sure that such a state continues indefinitely. The individual gunman will soon disappear from our thoughts and we can then settle down to the routine killings that take place every day, carried out collectively on the orders of politicians that we elect.

  • Coming to NYC “An Army of Rape: Why Supporting the Troops is Wrong! “

    I went over to the facebook page that was in this post. There is one comment that I could not pass up.

    Looking at the names involved that this conference this is going to be a real meeting of the minds. We have Sunsara Taylor, Carl Dix and Mathis. I find it funny that people are still refer him as a member of IVAW. Not to mention the direct statement that Carl Dix is a Communist.

    I tried to look for anything on the net but nothing so far. But considering that anything Mathis does is kept quiet for fear of use ruining it with his past.

  • Like, b w/u in spirit…man.

    As an admittedly petty aside, Coffee Strong has cancelled their “memorial” outside the gates of JBLM for the sixteen Afghans killed in the Stryker soldier’s shooting spree. They told the Seattle Post-Intelligencer that they cancelled it because they didn’t want to appear “anti-military”.

    Their supporters and members (a who’s who of Seattle area anti-military left-wing radicals) didn’t seem to feel that way. CS’s event page on facebook is filled with regretful apologies that they can’t get away from the bong tonight. In other words nobody was going to show up.