Category: Antiwar crowd

  • Pentagon: IEDs killed 21k Iraqis

    The Pentagon released some figures on civilian deaths in Iraq recently, according to USAToday, which show that 21,000 Iraqis were killed and another 68,000 were wounded as a result of IEDs between 2005 and now. Defense Department officials admitted that it’s difficult to tell who is a civilian and who is a terrorist once the bomb explodes;

    Despite the imprecision, Lapan said the military believes insurgents killed far more civilians than U.S. and allied forces have in Iraq. However, the military is unable to quantify the claim, he said.

    “The enemy put civilians purposely at great risk by its tactics and actions,” Lapan said in an e-mail.

    Estimates vary among organizations that have tried to count civilian dead, according to a review last year by the Congressional Research Service. The Iraqi Ministry of Human Rights reported that 85,694 Iraqi civilians died from insurgent attacks from 2004 through 2008.

    So who is really “occupying” Iraq here. The Left loves to blame all civilian deaths on the US presence in the country, but it looks to me that the dark forces are the real enemy of Iraqis here.

  • Speaking of Guantanamo

    One of my ninjas sent me these pictures from DC today where World Can’t Wait (the folks who sponsor Matthis in your kids’ classrooms) along with the ACLU and Geezers For Sitting On Our Hands are out side the White House right now.

    I’ve been to a few of these rallies. Here’s my posts from January 2008 when they marched to the Supreme Court and June 2008 with their “Experience Guantanamo” display.

  • Drama queen wants more attention

    After a Federal judge released Matthis and all of his vacuous fellow protesters with no charges, he’s back to planning for his next illegal activity, This time, he wants to go back to his roots, back to what gets him the most attention; flag burning.

    More symbolism, more Matthis-worship. More useless theater that doesn’t bring us closer to the end of any war, doesn’t save one life. Burn a flag so the high school chicks adore you. It’s like he’s Justin Bieber without the hair. If I were Janet Napolitano, I’d keep an eye on Matthis. In fact, Dahlia Wasfi thinks so, too;

  • Anti-war back in vogue

    Yesterday, we had Lynne Woolsey call the war in Afghanistan “an epic failure, a national embarrassment and a moral blight on this country”, today Barbara Lee calls the premise that “a military-first strategy that has consistently proven itself ineffective and counterproductive” in response to the announcement of 1400 Marines joining the fight in coming weeks.

    She reaffirms her nine-year opposition to the use of force against the Taliban and al Qaeda in the pages of the Huffington Post;

    …I will be reintroducing my legislation to limit funding in Afghanistan to the safe and orderly withdrawal of U.S. troops and military contractors and will further work with my colleagues to hold the President accountable for a significant July reduction in U.S. military presence.

    I guess Lee feels more comfortable railing against Republican leadership than she did against her own because I can’t remember her being this vocal during the Nancy Pelosi years after President Bush. So judging by these two clowns’ statements we can expect the anti-war crowd to resume their incessant yammering to mirror that which we heard in the opening days of the war when Republicans were in power.

    Of course, she’s playing to the crowd who are like this douch-bag;

    “Thanks, Rep. Lee. I am for stopping both wars. We spend billions on war while we give tax cuts to the rich (including the war contactors­) and send our poor and least educated men and women to fight. Brave sistah!”

    One of those 25% who couldn’t pass his ASVAB.

  • VoteVets and Taliban agree on Afghanistan bases

    The other day, I quoted from VoteVets VetVoice diarist, Richard Allen “dicksmith” Smith on Lindsay Graham’s proposal that we have permanent bases in Afghanistan after combat forces leave;

    My question to Lindsay Graham is “how do permanent bases in Afghanistan make us safer”? I’m not even certain that our temporary presence there is making us any safer at this point, much less an unending commitment.

    Well, according to the Associated Press, the Taliban feel the same way;

    In an online message released Tuesday, the Afghan Taliban said Sen. Lindsey Graham’s comments proved that the U.S. is intent on occupying Afghanistan and depriving its citizens of their rights.

    “His remarks definitely lifts the curtain from the colonialist motives of America,” the Taliban said in a statement detailed by the SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors militant websites. America, the Taliban said, wants to establish dominance over the region.

    Yes, Mr Taliban, we’re depriving the Afghans of their rights. Like their right to be doused in acid for attending school, their right to be stoned when they’re raped, their right to sit in the back of the room and shut up. Oh, wait…that’s you, isn’t it? Yes, the US has colonialist motives…every great power needs a source of sand to achieve their status. Every global hegemon needs a giant shit hole with a population that is dumber than a box of their own sand.

    But, if VoteVets and the Taliban ever join forces (maybe they can recruit Lynn Woolsey, too) clearly we’ll never be able to overcome their massive brain power.

  • Matthis: This avoiding work thing sure affects my bank account

    Matthis discovers that the “feeding the beast” thing sure does keep him from feeding himself;

    Getting gob smacked by reality is always tough. I guess cutting himself off from the IVAW treasury had a real down side.

  • Prysner: I resolve to be a better commie this year

    I took the day off yesterday, but my ninjas didn’t. They caught Mike Prysner resolving to be a better communist in the New year;

    If you don’t remember Prysner, he’s the co-founder of March Forward, the veteran wing of ANSWER who is ashamed of his service inside the wire in Iraq, yet wears his uniform more than most people on active duty. He tried to stage a coup in IVAW when he and some of his fellow travelers ran for positions on the IVAW’s board last year, mainly because his own membership drives in March Forward have ended up very anemic so he thought he could take over IVAW and turn them towards a more radical agenda.

    The Long March was Mao’s retreat in order to avoid combat with federal Chinese forces in 1934-35. I really don’t see much that Mao did that would inspire me, since he murdered millions of Chinese during his Great Leap Forward. But then, I’m not Mike Prysner.

  • Why ROTC shouldn’t be on campus

    OK, the clown-monkey, Colman McCarthy, who wrote this Washington Post commentary is also director of the Center for Teaching Peace in Washington, DC. Here’s a quotation from one of his lectures so you can judge the dimness of his bulb;

    Hitler could have been waited out. He might have been overthrown by his own government. Who knows? To have 50 million people killed: Hitler would have died within 10 years no matter what he did.

    So it’s really not surprising that he opposes an educated military force. But here’s how an anti-intellectual conversation with him goes;

    During our discussion, he took modest pride at having raised more than a billion dollars for Notre Dame, and expressed similar feelings about the university’s ROTC program. More than 700 student-cadets were in the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines. Few universities, public or private, had a larger percentage of students in uniform then. The school could have been renamed Fort Hesburgh.

    When I suggested that Notre Dame’s hosting of ROTC was a large negative among the school’s many positives, Hesburgh disagreed. Notre Dame was a model of patriotism, he said, by training future officers who were churchgoers, who had taken courses in ethics, and who loved God and country. Notre Dame’s ROTC program was a way to “Christianize the military,” he stated firmly.

    I asked if he actually believed there could be a Christian method of slaughtering people in combat, or a Christian way of firebombing cities, or a way to kill civilians in the name of Jesus. Did he think that if enough Notre Dame graduates became soldiers that the military would eventually embrace Christ’s teaching of loving one’s enemies?

    The interview quickly slid downhill.

    Of course, the military has nothing to do with turning our cheek, nor does it have anything to do loving our enemies…well, besides hastening their departure from this life to one in which they can answer for their behavior in this life.

    Since the freedom to worship how we please is one of the reasons that countless colonial-era immigrants came here before we were a nation a strong military defends that right from foreign enemies who’d like to force their religion on us. Even the dimwitted McCarthy should find something to be grateful for that we have a strong military, a military that counts devout Catholics in it’s ranks.

    Of course, McCarthy goes on to tell us how much he supports and admires the troops and ROTC Cadets, but of course, he can’t keep a straight face;

    At Notre Dame, on that 1989 visit and several following, I learned that the ROTC academics were laughably weak. They were softie courses. The many students I interviewed were candid about their reasons for signing up: free tuition and monthly stipends, plus the guarantee of a job in the military after college. With some exceptions, they were mainly from families that couldn’t afford ever-rising college tabs.

    ROTC and its warrior ethic taint the intellectual purity of a school, if by purity we mean trying to rise above the foul idea that nations can kill and destroy their way to peace.

    Yeah, well, we can’t “Peace Studies” our way to peace, either, numbskull. You need to peddle that shit to our enemies.

    More from Moe Lane. Thanks to Zedchek for the link.