Category: Antiwar crowd

  • Help IVAW name their new coffeehouse

    OK, so IVAW is getting themselves a new coffeehouse in Washington, outside the gates of Ft Lewis.  I just watched this (surprisingly well done) video documenting their search and the thinking going into it.

    [youtube 7iOSDz6_iww nolink]

    Anyway, totally think the (tentative) name, “Ogive Plunger” sucks.   It’s a piece on the Mk19, which is the preferred weapon of an IVAW member when telling a story about shooting unarmed women carrying groceries.  It makes a distinctive noise when told to you through the sobs of the largely ridiculous audience, and the quiet chuckling of the 2 asshat bloggers in the back.

    Anyway, I thought of three right off the bat which I think work well, but thought maybe our readers could come up with more.

    • AR 670-1  (Kinda catchy, this references an army regulation regarding proper wearing of the uniform which is still unread by 87.3% of their members.)
    • Big Chicken Dinner.  (While not serving actual chicken, the BCD refers to Bad Conduct Discharges, which most the imbibers of Juan Valdez’s best will likely have.)
    • Shit on a Stick in the Rain.  (Only drawback: might not be family friendly.)

    Your thoughts?

  • Looking for a war they can end

    With the Iraq War ending without any help from them, the Veterans for Peace are arbitrarily searching for a war which they can influence the outcome, apparently.

    kpc1-small.jpg

    kpc2.jpg

    Maybe they’d like to reverse the outcome of the Spanish-American War or  protest the rescue of the Czech Legion, too.

  • How’d I miss this?

    It seems Code Pink sponsored a Karaoke fundraiser for their heartthrobs at Iraq Veterans Against the War this weekend and I guess I missed it. Where’s my social secretary?

    dscn01521.jpg

    dscn01461.jpg

    But, I’ve got the next best thing; a video tour of the IVAW clubhouse conducted by head sociopath and self-promoter Adam Kokesh, who seems to have a hard-on for Nancy Pelosi these days;

     [youtube uuhvkDLgNXk nolink]

     Still, based on illogical dogma, he seems a bit upset that Pelosi and Conyers won’t start impeachment proceedings based on their emotional outbursts.

    The beginning of the video shows DC Cops at a checkpoint near the clubhouse checking cars – that’s been going on for weeks in DC and at random areas because of the escalating crime…not because the metro cops give a damn about the IVAW and their antics. Adam, you guys aren’t worth a checkpoint. Get over yourselves and move your clubhouse to a trendier neighborhood – maybe your dad can sell a few more polo ponies so you can move to Georgetown instead of hiding out on Howard University.

  • Combat tours cut

    The President today announced that because of the success of our troops in the Middle East, the enemy is on the run and the troops can count on shorter tours (Wall Street Journal link);

    President George W. Bush declared progress in the Iraq war Thursday, saying terrorists “are on the run” and a generally improved security environment should permit further U.S. troop reductions.

    Standing on the Colonnade outside the Oval Office of the White House, President Bush also announced that effective Thursday, the duration of troop tours in Iraq will be cut from 15 months to 12 months.

    Mr. Bush said this reduction “will relieve the burden on our forces and it will make life easier for our wonderful military families.”

    With no help from Democrats, with no help from the cutthroat back-stabbing sociopaths of the IVAW and Veterans For  Peace, no help from the drama queens at Code Pink, no help from the filthy hippies of ANSWER. With no help from Barack Obama, no help from Chuck Hagel. With no help from Harry Reid, no help from Nancy Pelosi. With no help from phony soldier John Murtha, no help from phony earthling Dennis Kucinich. No help from Jim Webb no help from Ron Paul..

    The troops and the President, all by themselves, did what nearly every media outlet said they couldn’t. Against the odds, against the pseudo-experts.

    They can all claim credit and change their stories from now until the cows come home, but the troops know who stood with them. And who didn’t.

  • Gitmo’s poets

    ob-by170_oj_bur_20080729185012.jpg

     Debra Burlingame writes in the Wall Street Journal about Abdullah Saleh Al-Ajmi, a former Guantanamo detainee cum homicide bomber in Mosul last March. His poetry was included in the book “Poems from Guantanamo: The Detainees Speak,” (Iowa University Press, 2007) and read for a Guantanamo “teach-in” in 2006;

     In his introductory remarks to the students, Mr. [Marc] Falkoff described Al-Ajmi and the other detainee poets as “gentle, thoughtful young men” who, though frustrated and disillusioned, expressed an abiding hope in the future. “One thing you won’t hear is hatred,” he said, “and the reason you won’t hear it is not because I edited it out, it’s because it’s not there in the poetry.”

    Two years after the “teach-in”, that gentle, thoughtful young man drove about 10,000 pounds of explosives into an Iraqi army compound and detonated the truck killing 13 and wounding scores of others leaving a smoldering 25-foot crater where his “gentle, thoughtful” personage evaporated.

    Burlingame reports that his father knew what kind of person he was;

    The bombings carried out by Al-Ajmi and two other Kuwaiti nationals have stirred a public outcry from their fellow citizens. Al-Ajmi’s own father has reportedly threatened to sue the government of Kuwait for issuing his son a passport and failing to live up to the terms set forth in the transfer agreement with U.S. State Department as a condition of his release. Kuwait’s negligence and the State Department’s failure to follow up have resulted in calls from the public for the detainees to stay right where they are and for Guantanamo to stay in operation.

    Their own countries are calling for them to stay put in Guantanamo;

    “We cannot romanticize them into fallen heroes of Western neo-imperialism,” wrote Shamael Al-Sharikh, a columnist for the Kuwaiti Times, in an article advocating that Guantanamo stay open, “because we are as much potential victims of terrorist attacks as [Americans] are.”

    My regular readers may remember the video interview I did last month with  a member of Amnesty International who kept claiming that these detainees have “human rights” – rights they won’t afford their victims. The courts and the lawyers and the whining-ass Amnesty International don’t understand that this isn’t a question of legal rights…it’s war. Even though we can’t bring our spineless politicians to that realization, the courts, whose main function it is to protect the People of the United States should arrive at that conclusion. Except our court system has taken on the personae of it’s sleaziest members and become ambulance-chasing shysters afraid they’re going to lose some business if they let the Executive Branch fight the war without their interference.

    There are no legal issues. These aren’t people who were picked up drunk on the street and shipped off to Guantanamo to populate some prison farm or sweatshop factory…these are folks scooped up from the front lines of the battle. Guantanamo didn’t turn them into suicidal maniacs…their culture did that.

    At least three who’ve been released have gone on to commit suicide attacks, at least four others have been killed in battle on the wrong side after their release. The more civilized elements on the Arab Street are beginning to see the benefit of removing these criminals from the world’s stage, how long before the Left puts our safety and security ahead of their petty politics and fund raising schemes?

    UPDATE FROM TSO:
    I actually shared some emails with Mr. Falkoff in June of last year when this book came out, I find what he said interesting now.

    My Email to him:

    From: TSO
    Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 1:43 PM
    To: mfalkoff@niu.edu
    Subject:
    I’m absolutely overjoyed that I took a year and a half off of law school to go to Afghanistan, watch friends of mine die, put my life on the line to capture these guys, and then you go and make money off their defense and publish their poetry. Looking forward to you publishing the letters home from SSG Craig Cherry and SGT Bobby Beasley.

    Sheer asshattery.

    TSO
    Combat Infantryman
    3L

    And his response to me:

    From: Marc Falkoff
    Date: Thursday, June 21, 2007 3:37 pm
    Subject: RE:
    Dear Mr. TSO,
    I am very sorry to learn of the deaths of your friends.

    You should know that none of the 17 men whom I represent has been accused of fighting or harming our troops. Nor were any of them taken into custody by Americans. Most were taken into custody in Pakistan, by Pakistani personnel, after they crossed the Afghan border trying to return to their families in Yemen.

    I understand that you may be disinclined to believe me. My only request for years has been to get my clients their day in court, where they will have an opportunity to prove their innocence. To date, none of my clients has been charged with crime, and none has been convicted of anything. One, in fact, was released from Guantanamo earlier this week, and is now home in Yemen.

    Neither I nor any of the detainees will make a penny off of the poetry book. We long ago arranged for all profits, if there are any, to be donated to the Center for Constitutional Rights, a human rights law firm.

    Respectfully,

    Marc Falkoff

    Wonder if the client released in his email is the one that was peacefully blowing people up in Iraq?

     UPDATE x2, nope, a different guy.

  • Obama still hasn’t learned his lesson

    How soon they forget. Barack Obama and the Democrats have forgotten how we spent billions of dollars in the eighties keeping Saddam Hussein in his box. How many times were our aircraft enforcing the No-Fly Zone attacked by surface-to-air missiles? At least twice, Hussein rattled his saber during the 90s and caused the Clinton Administration to send troops to Kuwait to man the prepositioned equipment we had there to protect the Kuwaitis. Not to mention missile attacks on Iraq proper to punish his assassination attempts or destroy his weapons labs.

    Iraq was the right war, but at the wrong time…Hussein should have been punished in 1991 when COB6 and I sat near the banks of Euphrates poised and equipped to rumble into Baghdad. But, Obama still insists it was the wrong war;

     “Our military is stretched extraordinarily because of trying to fight two wars at the same time, and so my job, as the next commander in chief, is going to be to make a decision what is the right war to fight and how do we fight it. And I think that we should have been focused on Afghanistan from the start,” [Obama] said.

    Two wars? Afghanistan and Iraq are part and parcel of the same war. Remember that some al Qaeda fighters busted ass for Iraq when the Taliban fell – including al-Zarqawi the first leader of al Qaeda in Iraq. All of these motor-mouths who claim we should have focused on Afghanistan instead of Iraq, I’d like them to tell me how we should have focused on Afghanistan more. They easily criticize how our resources should have been in Afghanistan…what resources? How, exactly, would they have done it differently? I’d like to see an alternate plan.

    President Bush criticized the Democrats for shooting off their mouths in the 2004 election without offering any alternatives…they still take the easy path and no one demands from them answers to the questions their empty platitudes raise.

  • Anti-war crowd loses it’s cachet

    Raoul emailed me a link to IVAW’s Adam Kokesh’s blog (which I won’t link – you can Google it) where Adam reports on the impeachment hearing in Congress yesterday. As expected, it was nothing but a good bit of theater starring Dennis Kucinich, Bob Barr and Cindy Sheehan.

    To his credit, Conyers is completely ignoring the IVAW and Vets for Peace after their confrontation last week. I think Conyers realizes that his mouth wrote a check his ass can’t cash. The Democrats promised impeachment hearings in 2006 and now they’ve got nuthin’. They either lack the will or the legal footing to continue with impeachment, but they don’t have the guts to admit it to their base.

    (more…)

  • Conyers ignores Nader

    Ralph Nader is more than a little peeved that the Democrats, specifically John Conyers, haven’t included him the hearings on impeachment slated to begin earlier today so he did what nerds do best – fired off a strongly-worded letter;

    You have invited four members of the House to testify including, of course, Congressman Kucinich and several observers of the subject, including the inestimable former mayor of Salt Lake City Rocky Anderson, Bruce Fein and John Dean. The Libertarian candidate for President, Bob Barr is also on the witness list, but I am not.

    This is not the first time that I have been excluded from testifying on subjects both of us have been concerned about and have discussed.

    I see  poor Ralph underneath the basket in gym class jumping up and down waving his arms yelling “Throw it to me! Throw it to me!” And John Conyers, knowing Nader’s gonna drop the ball, just won’t.

    Never mind that they have no evidence, or any legitimate charges, or that they could better use their time trying to find some place to drill for oil or some place to build a refinery. Ralph just wants some face time.
    It’s all a little political theater for the nutroots and so Adam Kokesh, IVAW, the VFP and Code Pink won’t yell at them again.