From Jonn: Since everyone is sending me this in emails, I’ve bumped it up from when we first posted it in September last year so you don’t think I’m ignoring your emails.
Hilarious.
From Jonn: Since everyone is sending me this in emails, I’ve bumped it up from when we first posted it in September last year so you don’t think I’m ignoring your emails.
Hilarious.
Senator John McCain came to my school yesterday (University of Tampa) for a visit with ROTC Cadets and Veterans. It was a good event, non-partisan, just “The Maverick” talking about the world and what is going on in the Middle East.
He certainly knows his stuff — especially with such seniority in the Senate — but I certainly disagree with him on some issues. One is Afghanistan. He kept mentioning the surge strategy in Iraq and applying it to Afghanistan. I couldn’t help but ask him the following:
“Senator McCain, it’s an honor to be see you here today. I have a question in regards to the war in Afghanistan.
You keep mentioning the surge strategy in Iraq. That surge was instrumental in the war and initially increased the number of attacks on troops but eventually they leveled off and then the number of attacks drastically fell.
Unlike that surge, the Afghan surge of 30,000 troops has seen attacks increase each month, according to open source intelligence. Our rules of engagement for troops in contact mean increasingly that our soldiers and Marines are not getting the artillery and close air support that they need. Further, our own Afghan security forces are continuing to shoot our troops on our own bases.
We have given a pullout date of 2014. My question is, why are we waiting until then?”
Unfortunately, he did like most politicians do when they don’t want to answer a question. They answer a completely different one. I don’t think he understood what I was asking so he answered as if my point was that we need to end the war now, get troops come home immediately, etc.
What I was trying to say was that the war strategy right now is not working, we are not effective in the job (due to ROEs/Politicians), and we should either change strategy or leave immediately.
He started talking about how the terrorists would continue to use it, we’re fighting the guys from where 9/11 originated, etc.
After I came home from the event, I looked around for news coverage. I found some, but interestingly enough, I found a story on Rep. C.W. Young, a staunch supporter of the war, who has just come out in favor of immediate withdrawal. The story says the following:
The congressman said he came to his new position after talking with veterans over the past three months and hearing about what a “real mess” Afghanistan is in.
I know John McCain often visits troops overseas and gets their opinions. I wonder what he’s hearing on his trips?
And finally, here’s a news story where I am mentioned, although I’m only referred to as student.
Since I go to school nearby at the University of Tampa, I decided to walk over and see if I could spot any decent protests. Fortunately for the police, they were pretty light.
There are small pockets here and there but nothing coordinated or even mildly exciting. The scene in downtown Tampa is mainly one of police officers just standing around in large groups talking.
Nonetheless, here are some photos from my stroll. I have a video as well but can’t upload it yet until I get to a better connection. (UPDATE: Embedded the video below)








Seeing veteran, I was genuinely interested in talking with a fellow vet. So I went over, and said, “So, you’re a veteran?”
“No.”
My response was then one of irritation, saying it’s a bit of false advertising, now isn’t it?
Then his buddy next to him tries to help him out, saying, “A veteran made the sign and wanted him to hold it for him.”
Ok. That’s all for now. I’m off to go see Jonn.
[UPDATE: Here’s the only video I took, of the crazy people in the first picture.]
I don’t really go on Twitter to find phonies at all. I just happened to see someone retweet (basically copy and republish what was said to the “twitter-uninitated”) something from a user with the name “FormerGrunt”. I thought, well.. let’s take a look at the Former Grunt.
Something I noticed right off the bat is the profile photo. I’ve seen that photo before. Quick search and found it: SFC Daniel Crabtree. He’s a Special Forces soldier that was killed in Iraq in 2006. Quick lineup and flip in Photoshop and we have an exact match.
So I decide to ask him about it… but since he’s a secret squirrel, he’s fuzzy on details. (more…)
As I always do each morning, I check my email. What I found today was a nice email from Paul Rieckhoff of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, letting me know about the dangers of for-profit colleges. For-profit colleges, it is now known, account for a huge chunk of Post 9/11 GI Bill payouts, but oftentimes deliver a dismal learning experience and engage in questionable marketing practices.
Well — not to worry — because Paul and the boys at IAVA “Got Your Back” as they like to say, and they want to hear your story if you’ve been a target of deceptive marketing by one of these schools.
But wait… wasn’t there an improvement act passed to the Post 9/11 GI Bill a couple years back? Let’s check the memory hole…
Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA) is encouraged by the Chairman’s discussion draft of S. 3447, the “Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Improvement Act.” This discussion draft of S. 3447 will improve the New GI Bill and ensure that all student veterans have access to the most generous investment in veterans’ education since World War II. By simplifying and streamlining the administrative rules, S. 3447 would enable the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) to process GI Bill claims in a timely manner. S. 3447, which we have come to call the “New GI Bill 2.0,” is a comprehensive effort to address the concerns of tens of thousands of student veterans and their families by:
• Offering valuable job training for students studying at vocational schools
• Granting National Guardsmen who respond to national disasters full GI Bill credit
• Providing living allowances for veterans in distance learning programs
• Simplifying and expanding the tuition benefit
• Including a book stipend for active duty students
IAVA is proud to endorse this legislation, contingent upon the following improvements being included in the bill. We therefore have included several simple and important technical recommendations we would like to see addressed in the August mark-up.
[…]
IAVA Technical Recommendations: A student veteran pursuing a degree through a distance program should qualify for a living allowance based on the zip code of his or her residence. Or, at the very least, the living allowance should be set at the lowest Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) rate for an E-5 pay grade, with dependents. This adjustment would be an increase of about $140 over the currently purposed rate.
Let me translate. It was Congress, pushed by IAVA who brought on these predators. Before this act, a veteran had to attend a traditional university to get the living stipend. IAVA would like you to forget that they helped push legislation that the for-profit college industry was so happy to see come to fruition.
But the internet never forgets.