Well, it looks like another Federal agency has been ordered to produce email from a former employee and can’t. And like the IRS, this one is also being blamed on, “My hard drive ate my email.”
Back in 2009, a former EPA employee, Phillip North, “arranged” (some might say, “conspired”) with a number of his colleagues to veto a proposed mine – the Pebble Mine – before the EPA even started evaluating its potential environmental impact. This is obviously not “according to Hoyle”.
The House Oversight Committee has been investigating the matter for some time. However, there’s a problem: North fled to New Zealand, and is not cooperating with Congressional investigators.
The House requested the EPA’s help in getting data concerning North and the Pebble Mine issue. The EPA Administrator, Gina McCarthy, has now notified the House that – you guessed it – they are “unable to provide lawmakers all of the documents they have requested on the proposed Pebble Mine in Alaska, because of a 2010 computer crash.”
Sounds kinda familiar, doesn’t it? Hey, it seems to be working for the IRS. Why not?
Oh, and regarding the IRS/Lerner scandal – there’s a bit more, um, “interesting news” about Lerner and her missing email. It seems as if the IRS told the White House about Lerner’s missing email at least a month before it told Congress. And it also seems that Lerner sought to start a IRS investigation of some sort of a sitting US Senator over what a reasonable person might conclude could have been nothing more than pique – specifically, an invitation to a political fund raiser mistakenly sent to her from a political foe.
Oh, and in case you’re wondering why current IRS Commissioner John Kosiken is receiving such a warm (some would say “fawning”) reception from one party in Congress: this might explain it. It seems Kosiken has consistently donated to one political party over the years – to the tune of around $85,000.
Nothing to see here, folks. Just more business as usual for “the most transparent Administration in history”.
Or maybe that should read “getting ‘the business’ transparently from a historically-bad Administration.”
