They’re obviously against it, right? I mean, it’s one of Academia’s cardinal sins.
So they must be aghast at the prospect of a plagiarist being elected to the US Senate, right?
Not so fast. According to Eric Fever, president of the Montana Education Association-Montana Federation of Teachers, it’s no big deal:
Husband, father, soldier, straight talking, no bullshit Democrat, Walsh is in his own words “no academic.” His bout with plagiarism proves that. But his bout with plagiarism has harmed no one but himself.
I can’t wait to see how Montana teachers react to the “it didn’t hurt anyone else” excuse when they catch someone using an obviously-plagiarized paper for their classwork. Based on the above, I guess they’ll give the perp a pass – as well as a passing grade.
And Fever is hardly alone. Here’s a quote from an article posted by Montana teacher Don Pogreba on his blog Intelligent Discontent:
Let’s get one thing out of the way: it was plagiarism. Some, eager to defend Senator Walsh, have suggested that because he cited the material in footnotes, he wasn’t plagiarizing, but that’s a too-generous, and incorrect assessment….
A person’s ethics are hardly defined by one error in judgment.
I guess Pogreba hasn’t gotten around to reading the 9-page DAIG 2010 Report of Investigation concerning Walsh’s other little bit of “interesting” conduct while serving in the MT ARNG. That report substantiates different misconduct on Walsh’s part that IMO also calls his ethics into question.
Or perhaps Pogreba is simply OK with politicians using public resources improperly, and using their public position for for private gain. As long as he agrees with their politics, of course.
Ya know, for some reason I keep hearing an old Randy Newman tune playing in the background when I read those articles: “It’s Money That Matters”. But then again, I tend to hear that every time a union flack opens his or her mouth these days.