Author: Hondo

  • Just More “Joe Being Joe”

    The Vice President gave a speech recently.  He talked about the deadly 2011 tornado in Joplin, MO.

    But he made a small error during his remarks.

    The Vice President talked about the “161,000 brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, sons, daughters, grandparents lost” in that natural disaster.  The actual death toll was 161.

    For comparison, the Great Kanto Earthquake of 1923 – after which parts of Tokyo burned for two days – had a death toll of approximately 142,000.

    Given the speaker, I think we can blame this one on cluelessness vice mendacity.

    But that’s OK, he’s in good company.  At one time, his boss apparently thought there were 58 states (and he’d visited 57 of them!).  And their “patron saint”, Jimmy the Clueless, claims he could have beaten Reagan in 1980 if he’d been “more manly”.  (smile)

  • Yet More VA Waste and Abuse?

    Watchdog.org has a new article up today about the VA.  This time, they’re questioning some activities at the 111-bed VA Overton Brooks Medical Center in Shreveport, LA.  At first glance, it certainly seems that the activities in question need questioning.

    Seems the VA Medical Center there has some problems.  The article lists several.  But the one that got my attention most was the fact that it has been running out of things lately.

    What kind of things, you ask?  Well, things like toiletries – toothbrushes, toothpaste, stuff like that – for patients.

    Well, that’s not so bad, you say?  True.  But they’ve been running out of other stuff, too.  Like clean sheets.  And serviceable blankets.  And clean pajamas.

    However, it also seems like the facility has plenty of money.  They recently spent just under $74,500 on flat screen TVs.  No, not new TVs for each of the 115 patient rooms.  New 42″ (and one 50″) flat-screen TVs to be placed in hallways at elevators.  The VA issued a statement saying that these TVs were

    . . . procured to serve as an electronic bulletin board that “offers an easy way to spread information to a wide audience in a short amount of time. It also provides a way to inform … (about) Medical Center activities, future events and specific health-related topics,” . . .

    Hmm.  Yeah, that’s a great way to use our tax money instead using it to support basic facility operations.  I can’t see why anybody would complain.

    They also bought new furniture – at least some of which was made in Canada, not the US – to the tune of just over $134,000.  And they spent $3M on solar cells for the facility.

    Hey, sometimes you need to replace furniture, and the facility was built in 1950.  So maybe the furniture buy was legit – though given employee accounts that much of the furniture previously on hand was in “great shape”, I kinda doubt it.

    I also don’t have any data on the payback period for the solar cells, so I won’t dispute that purchase either.  Based on previous idiocy we’ve seen from this Administration regarding other so-called “green energy” products (like that $24/gallon biodiesel the Navy purchased), I have my doubts.  I’d guess it’s likely a waste, and will never pay for itself.  But maybe not.

    Further:  this hospital is currently sending their soiled items over 100miles to another VA facility to be laundered so that job can be performed by VA employees.  (And no, I’m not joking; that’s really their stated reason for periodically running out of bedding and pajamas.)  So I think I can recommend an easier and simpler way to save even more energy than spending $3M on solar cells – and one that has a real short payback period.

    But the hallway TV procurement for use as an “electronic bulletin board” really bothers the sh!t out of me.

    Why?  Well, for starters:  $74,000 for 24 TVs works out to over $3,080 each.  That probably includes the broadcast source, cabling, and installation.  But still:  close to $3,100 a screen?  Damn, that seems pretty excessive for something used to display the weather, inspirational sayings, quotations from modern poets, and healthy lifestyle exhortations  at the facility’s elevators – which is what one employee says is all that is routinely displayed on them.

    But that’s not what torques me the worst.  What galls me most is that I took a few minutes, looked up a few prices for hospital bedding (here) and blankets (here), and did a little math.  And the results (and implications of same) were, well, disgusting.

    Per those price sources, purchased in case lots (60 each) a set of sheets plus a pillowcase runs somewhere about $20.  A decent cover/blanket runs about the same.  So a set of hospital bedding runs about $40.

    That’s commercial pricing.  I’m guessing the government could negotiate a substantially better price – but let’s use those numbers anyway.

    $74,000 / $40 = 1,850.  That means the money spent on those flat-screen TVs could have bought 1,850 complete sets of bedding for the facility (set of sheets, pillowcase, blanket).

    The facility has 111 beds.  Assuming a daily change of sheets for each bed, that’s over 2 weeks worth of linen for every hospital room in the facility.  Even if each bed needs a 2nd change once a week (due to sickness, accidents, spills, etc . . . ), that’s still nearly 2 weeks worth of linen.  Cut back the furniture buy by about 33% and you’re talking about purchasing around 3 weeks worth.

    Seems to me that 2 weeks is more than enough time to get the laundry done and returned.  And it seems that having a 3-week supply of new bedding on-hand would fix the current problem of periodically running out.  But apparently having those damned TVs and that new furniture was more important than making sure patients had clean linen when needed.

    The basic article goes on to discuss a number of other problems at that VA Medical Center.  Disgusting – there’s really no other word.

    . . .

    I’ve said it before, but I’ll repeat myself here.  IMO, the VA doesn’t have a resource problem.  The VA has a leadership, culture, and priorities problem.

    The new VA Secretary there needs to f**king clean house among his agency’s management.

     

     

     

  • “Eager to Rid Itself of Iraq”

    “. . . the President’s team at the White House pushed back, and the differences occasionally became heated. … and those on our side viewed the White House as so eager to rid itself of Iraq that it was willing to withdraw rather than lock in arrangements that would preserve our influence and interests.”

    No, that’s not a quote from Charles Krauthammer, Ann Coulter, or another Conservative political commentator.  It’s not a quote from some politician with an “R” after his name, either.

    As Jonn noted earlier today, that quote is reportedly from former SECDEF Leon Panetta’s upcoming memoir.

    Panetta goes on to state his opinion that White House engagement would have resulted in an agreement for some residual level of US forces to remain in Iraq post-2011.  He further states his belief that those forces would have made a critical difference in the recent situation there.

    But what would Panetta know?  After all, he’s only the former SECDEF and DIR CIA.

    My take on this is somewhat different from Jonn’s.  Panetta’s job as SECDEF wasn’t to make the decision on Iraq.  Rather, his job was to advise the POTUS regarding the ramifications of either option – then to implement the decision made by the POTUS.  Sounds to me like he did precisely that.  My issue here is very different than Jonn’s.

    The current Administration has been trotting out the “we really wanted to keep some forces there, but the Iraqi government wouldn’t let us”      bunch of bullsh!t      load of horsesh!t      baldfaced lie      whopper      flight of fantasy      tall tale       revisionist history recently concerning the 2011 US -Iraq negotiations.  With all due respect:  quit trying to “rectify” history again, Mr. President.  Because as they might have said where I grew up:  “Now, that dog just don’t hunt.”  Your attempts to “blame Bush” here are being disavowed by people who saw what your Administration actually did – from the inside.  Everyone can see the attempt to “blame Bush” this time is bull.

    Panetta is saying essentially the same thing here as the former US Ambassador to Iraq, Ryan Crocker has said elsewhere.  So Panetta’s account would seem to have support from someone else who was in an excellent position to know “ground truth” in Iraq.

    How about you quit trying to blame the current situation in Iraq on your predecessor, Mr. President.  In 2011, your hands weren’t tied.  You had your chance to prevent the current problems there from developing – and your Administration consciously chose not to.  Instead, you played Pontius Pilate and “washed your hands of the matter”.

    Fine. But the subsequent rise of ISIL and it’s takeover of much of Iraq is a direct consequence of that “hand-washing”.  That means that the situation in Iraq today with ISIL is your responsibility – yours, not someone else’s.  You and your Administration are the ones who “screwed the pooch” here.

    You own this.  Time to “man up” and admit it – for once.  (Hey, a guy can dream – can’t he?)

     

  • On the Absurdity of Being Earnest

    White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest, speaking about the situation in Dallas:  there “are screening procedures in place at our border.”

    Sure there are, Mr. Earnest – sure there are.  And the CDC folks in Dallas are working desperately to track down and monitor about 100 close contacts of a man who recently came to the US from Liberia as part of some readiness exercise, right?

    Sheesh.   Compared to these guys, Baghdad Bob was as trustworthy as Lincoln.

  • Bush to Current White House Occupant: “Told Ya So”

    Well, no – those weren’t his exact words; the former POTUS was far more diplomatic than that.  But that’s the clear message of George W. Bush’s latest public comment on the situation today in Iraq.

    Remember:  in July 2007, Bush made 4 clear predictions about what would happen if US forces left Iraq too soon.  He warned that doing so would

    • surrender the future of Iraq to al Qaeda
    • risk seeing mass killings on a horrific scale
    • allow terrorists to establish a safe haven in Iraq
    • increase the chance that American troops would have to return at some later date

    Don’t believe me?  Watch him make that prediction yourself.

    Sounds to me a lot like what we’ve seen during the last few months.  YMMV.

    Obviously someone didn’t heed those warnings in 2011.

     

  • Still Clueless, After All These Years

    Time today has a short article concerning perhaps the most incompetent President this nation has ever had.  Like it’s subject, the article is brief – and uninspiring.

    But it does have this little “nugget of wisdom”:

    Former President Jimmy Carter claimed Wednesday that he would have been re-elected and beaten Ronald Reagan in 1980 if had been more “manly” in his dealings with Iran.

    The Clueless One goes on to claim that his “prayers were answered” when “every hostage came home safe and free”, and that he’d have been reelected if he’d started a war. He implies that he took the moral high ground instead, and suffered the consequences.

    Looks to me like Jimmy the Clueless is still fond of slinging some kind of “nuggets”.  But I  wouldn’t exactly call what he’s slinging here “wisdom”.

    Here’s a clue for ya, Jimmy-boi – “morality” doesn’t have a damn thing to do with why you allowed this nation to be humiliated by Khomeini’s Iran. Rather, you didn’t act more “manly” because you weren’t capable of being more more “manly”.  You simply didn’t have it in you.

    That’s why you weren’t more “manly” in dealing with Iran. Period. So don’t p!ss on our legs almost 34 years after the fact and tell us it’s raining.

    Let me ‘splain something else to ya, Peanut-boi. This nation is still paying for your Administration’s clueless incompetence in the Middle East from 1977-1981. Even today that example of stunning, feckless foreign policy idiocy emboldens Islamist groups worldwide.

    And I haven’t even mentioned your impotent, hand-wringing, supine response to Russia’s invasion of Afghanistan.  (Yeah, that “Olympic Boycott” really hurt those nasty Soviets, didn’t it?  They pulled right out of Afghanistan the day it was announced – right?)   Without that invasion, there’s no need to support any mujahideen – period.  Your policies in Iran doubtless tipped the scales for the Soviets on making that grab.

    They knew you’d stand by and do nothing effective.  You’d already proven that in Iran.

    Finally:  though it will never be proven, I am convinced that had you not stood by with your thumb firmly inserted as the Shah and Iran fell to radical Islam 9/11 would never have happened. A strong, friendly Iran would have been a much simpler and easier way to deliver US support to Afghan mujahideen than Pakistan. Without the need to use Pakistan as a conduit for that aid, al Qaeda and the Afghan Taliban probably never happen.  Hell, with a strong Iran friendly towards the US, the Soviet Afghan invasion IMO probably doesn’t happen at all.

    Put that in your “peanut jar” and munch on it, Jimmy.  And then, how about you just shut the hell up.

     

    Author’s note:  apologies to Paul Simon.

  • “Workplace Violence”, Eh?

    I’m sure everyone reading this has heard about the recent beheadings in Oklahoma by that new convert to Islam, Alton Nolen. Jonn’s written about that previously here.

    I’m also sure everyone’s head by now that authorities have characterized the incident as “workplace violence” – and NOT as an act of“Islamic terrorism”. Gotta refrain from “jumping to conclusions” lest we “offend someone”, right?

    Put me down as “unconvinced” about that. Why? Well, let’s see. For starters

    and, finally

    • Nolen seems to have been fired from his job for an at-work argument with co-workers in which he said that women “should be stoned” for a particular offense (not further identified).  So not long afterwards, he came back to his former place of employment – and tried to kill two women, succeeding in one case, and beheading his victim.

    Now, individually, none of these are necessarily telling.  But collectively they make a fairly persuasive argument that this was a calculated act of Islamic terrorism – albeit possibly one committed by a lone individual vice a larger group.

    Why do I say that?  Simplicity, folks – simplicity.  “If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck,acts like a duck, and quacks like a duck, well . . . chances are pretty damn good it’s a duck.“

    Further, behavior of a number of members of OKC’s Islamic community during and after the press conference concerning the incident was, to say the least, both troubling and shocking. So while this a-hole may well have acted alone, he apparently was not the only one in OKC with similar twisted beliefs and loyalties.

    So, tell me: why are the authorities p!ssing on our leg and telling us it’s raining? That is:  why are they bald-faced lying to us, and calling a pretty damned obvious incident of radical Islamic terrorism “workplace violence” – once again?

    Oh, yeah, I remember now: we must be “nice”. We must refrain from “offending anyone”.

    Even when the bastards are trying to kill us.

  • Yeah, I Think That Sign Could Use a “Do-Over”

    The UK’s Telegraph Travel might not be able to see a problem.  But I think I can.