Author: Jonn Lilyea

  • “Where have you been?”

    According to the Washington Post, during yesterday’s hearings about the Walter Reed dust-up;

    “I have to tell you, the first thing that pops into my mind is: Where’ve you been? Where has all the brass been?” said Rep. John F. Tierney (D-Mass.), who convened the hearing as chairman of the national security and foreign affairs subcommittee. “All the things that [were] heard, read about and heard earlier today, clearly, this can’t all be pushed down at the lower level. Clearly this is not some junior officer’s responsibility that nobody else has to claim anything for.”

    I’d ask Mr Tierney the same question. When this war began, supposedly back when the Democrats still supported the President, I made rounds to the wounded soldiers in some of the wards. The nephew of a high school friend had been in that Chinook crash right before Thanksgiving of 2003 when about 60 troops were killed. He miraculously survived but lost part of one of his legs. Well, anyway, I smuggled him in a bottle of Saranac Black and Tan, a local brew from back home, and his wife came over to our apartment a few times and fixed him a couple of homecooked meals to take to the hospital.

    While I was up there, I talked to some of the troops (one of my favorite past times) and none of them had been visited by their Congressional reps, so I started taking down their names and hometowns and faxing the information to Congressional offices.

    After awhile, it got too overwhelming because idiot staffers would call me at work and ask stupid questions about how they could verify that the information I sent them was true, doctors names and phone numbers – all the stuff they could find out with a simple call to the Walter Reed PAO. Besides, I’d influenced enough people to get them pro-active on visiting their constituents.

    The thing that really got me out of the business, though, was when I told a staffer who had waited five days to call me and ask about a young troop that the hero had died. He was a great kid with a lovely young wife whom I’d met on Thanksgiving when I was passing out pogie bait. It broke my heart that he’d died. Just thinking about his wife and their new baby, I just lost it on the phone with the tardy staffer. So I stopped doing it for completely selfish reasons.

    So where these pompous, arrogant congressmen all of this time? If they’d been REALLY worried about their constituents, they’d have already known about conditions in Building 18. They shouldn’t have had to wait to read it in the Post.Â

    UPDATE: Bob Dole and Donna Shalala have been chosen to head a presidential commission on veterans’ health care. Bob Dole I understand – he’s spent years in the vet health system. But what the hell is Shalala doing there. Other than teach at college, all she’s ever been is a shill for Clinton Administration. I guess she’ll play the Jamie Gorelick and deflect criticism from the Clinton Administration so like all other “bi-partisan commissions” this one will be useless, too.

  • Webb defends Iran, House caves on Iraq

    According to Christina Bellatoni of the Washington Times, freshman Senator Jim “Snippy” Webb is about to introduce legislation to prevent the President from defending us against Iran;

    Freshman Sen. James H. Webb Jr. yesterday introduced legislation to force President Bush to seek congressional authorization before using force against Iran.
        Democratic leaders, who indicated general support for the Virginia Democrat’s plan last week, are still deciding whether they will attach it to an upcoming spending bill.
        “This presidency has shot from the hip too many times for us to be able to trust it to act on its own,” said Mr. Webb, a decorated Vietnam veteran who won a hotly contested Senate race last fall in part because of his opposition to the Iraq war. “We need the Congress to be involved in any decision to commence military activities absent an attack from the other side or a direct threat.”

    Yeah, the Democrats have proven themselves so valuable in this war against terror that we need them to distinguish the events in Iraq from the events in Iran. Like I’ve said, it’s the same war – just like Cambodia was the same as the war in Vietnam. The Left kept us from cutting off the NVA from their supplies in Cambodia with their incessant chatter about “illegal war” and so on. Are they planning to get more US troops killed by preventing us from ending the threat from Iran, just so we can see this;


     

    While Webb is busy shielding his allies in Iran, the cut-and-run Democrats in Congress are busy working on another half-wit scheme to hamstring the president in Iraq. Since they can’t summon the testicular fortitude to come right out and defund our efforts, the Washington Post reports that;

    Senior House Democrats, seeking to placate members of their party from Republican-leaning districts, are pushing a plan that would place restrictions on President Bush’s ability to wage the war in Iraq but would allow him to waive them if he publicly justifies his position.

    Under the proposal, Bush would also have to set a date to begin troop withdrawals if the Iraqi government fails to meet benchmarks aimed at stabilizing the country that the president laid out in January.

    The plan is an attempt to bridge the differences between anti-war Democrats, led by Rep. John P. Murtha (Pa.), who have wanted to devise standards of troop readiness strict enough to force Bush to delay some deployments and bring some troops home, and Democrats wary of seeming to place restrictions on the president’s role as commander in chief.

    So what kind of magic bullet do they craft?

    The new plan would demand that Bush certify that combat troops meet the military’s own standards of readiness, which are routinely ignored. The president could then waive such certifications if doing so is in “the national interest.”

    Democrats hope the waiver and benchmark proposals, whose details were confirmed by aides and senior Democrats close to the House Appropriations Committee and leadership, will keep the policymaking responsibilities on Bush. That should allow the committee to move forward next week with a $100 billion war spending bill.

    Since the Democrats can’t even agree on the single issue that they believe got them in office, they’re punting. Probably because they’re coming to realize that it wasn’t their opposition to the war and the president that got them into office at all. Or maybe it’s because they never had a plan to end the war until the last three plans since January.

    They were too busy gloating, partying and attacking the President’s every word to actually put a moment’s thought into what their policy would look like. Now they have to cobble together SOMETHING…ANYTHING to save their stupid faces.

  • Washington Post just won’t let it go

    Yeah, OK, we get it already, WaPo. After being bombarded for a week now with stories ABOUT ONE FRIGGIN’ BUILDING at Walter Reed, Washington Post is adjusting fire and assaulting the entire veterans care systemin an article entited “It Is Just Not Walter Reed“;

    “It is just not Walter Reed,” Oliva slowly tapped out on his keyboard at 4:23 in the afternoon on Friday. “The VA hospitals are not good either except for the staff who work so hard. It brings tears to my eyes when I see my brothers and sisters having to deal with these conditions. I am 70 years old, some say older than dirt but when I am with my brothers and sisters we become one and are made whole again.”

    Firstly, I’d like to say that it’s certainly not difficult to find a soldier who’ll bitch to the press about anything. In fact, we used to say that if the troops quit bitching, it’s time to worry.

    Secondly, where was the damn Washington Post 13 years ago? Do they honestly believe that conditions in Veterans care facilities just got bad on January 20th, 2001? Where were they when I complained about 80-year-old patients were left for hours on gurneys in the hallway of the VA hospital in Syracuse, NY shivering from the cold and covered in a thin sheet back in 1994? 

    Where was the Washington Post when I was in the VA hospital in Washington DC back in 2000 and wasn’t fed for more three days – despite my constant harangue? I’ve been in VA facilities since then and conditions have improved immeasurably – despite the fact that President Bush’s Administration has increased the number of eligible veterans 6-fold!

    There are still problems (mostly because of the drama-queen administrators – like the idiot “patient advocate” at the DC hospital who I swear sounds and looks like a man, but overacts as well as any New Orleans whore on her way to jail) but it’s a damn-sight better than it has been before President Bush. The only way the DC hospital will get better is to fire those morons so deeply entrenched in their jobs that they’ll never fear being fired. But that’s true of any beaurocratic organization – especially on inside the Beltway.

    WaPo also has a companion story about homeless veterans. But where the Hell were they just two months ago when the DC VA Medical Center flung their doors open to more than three hundred local homeless veterans for their annual Winterhaven event? Go ahead and “google” Winterhaven on Washington Post’s website – no results found. “Google” the word veterans and you get five pages of Walter Reed stories.

    So where have you been, WaPo? If you had given a tiny rat’s ass before, you’d have something to compare current conditions with. But since you haven’t bothered before, your credibility (those few tattered shreds remaining) is shot to Hell.

  • British point finger at Iran

    From the London Sunday Telegraph by way of the Washington Times;

    A missile that brought down a Royal Air Force Lynx helicopter and killed five British service members was smuggled into Iraq by Iranian agents, an official inquiry into the attack will reveal.
        The Sunday Telegraph has learned that a British Army Board of Inquiry (BOI) into the events surrounding the May attack will state that the weapon, a shoulder-launched surface-to-air missile known as an SA14 Strella, came from Iran.
        The attack, which was responsible for the death of Flight Lt. Sarah Mulvihill, the first British servicewoman to be killed on active service since World War II, appears to provide further evidence of Iran’s direct involvement in the deaths of British troops serving in Iraq.

    Ahmadinejad the Denier had better take stock of who he’s pissing off here. The Left can’t protect him from the neocons forever. Ask Saddam.

  • Secretary of the Army; comparison

    With nearly every news show and news paper focusing on the resignation of the Army Secretary Francis Harvey over the Walter Reed disgrace, I began wondering how the same media covered Bill Clinton’s first choice for the Secretary of the Army, John Shannon;

    THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

    Washington – The Army’s acting secretary, John Shannon, has been charged with shoplifting a woman’s blouse and skirt at a post exchange near the Pentagon, the Army said yesterday.

    The incident occurred Thursday at the Army PX at Ft. Myer, Va., said Army spokesman Col. Steve Rausch. A store detective apprehended Shannon for allegedly shoplifting a woman’s blouse and skirt, the spokesman said.

    Shannon, 59, was charged with misdemeanor theft of government property, an offense that carries a maximum penalty of 1 year in prison and a $100,000 fine, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Chesnut, a federal prosecutor in Alexandria, Va.

    Four one-line paragraphs.

    And the New York Times;

    August 28, 1993, Saturday
    Late Edition – Final, Section 1, Page 6, Column 1, 371 words

    The Acting Secretary of the Army, John W. Shannon, was placed on administrative leave today after being accused of shoplifting, the Army said. Mr. Shannon was accused of shoplifting a skirt and blouse valued at about $30 from the Army post exchange at Fort Myer, Va., on Thursday….

    Page 6, 371 words. A little different than this story in yesterday’s Times which is two .html pages long. And not a word in the Washington Post’s archives about the 1993 incident.

    Seems to me that an Army Secretary who shoplifts has more personal deficiencies than one who doesn’t personally inspect every building the Army owns. And, in case anyone is wondering what happened to John Shannon, the Clinton Administration kept him on the Pentagon payroll for eight years as a paid consultant.

  • What I found at Walter Reed

    I’d hoped this whole Walter Reed Army Medical Center thing would go away. I’ve gotten emails and PMs from as far away as Spain asking me questions so I reay couldn’t avoid it any longer. What I’m going to write isn’t going to endear me to the pro-military folks, nor will it make me warm and fuzzy with anti-Bush nutjobs – everyone will be equally pissed off at me.

    I stopped short of writing about the real problem in order to protect my job, promotion potential and my readership because the real problem is in that subject category that we don’t discuss here in DC. But you can read it between the lines if you try hard enough.

    This is the second time I wrote this, by the way. The first time, Bill Gates ate it, so as I remember unusually insightful comments that I made initially, before everything turned blue and died, and I wrote the second version hamstrung by extreme anger, I may add them here.

    I’ve spent a good part of this week talking to people who’ve lived in Building 18, facility engineers, NCOs and civilian contractors about the problem off the record. Because it’s off-the-record, please don’t take what I write as gospel on the subject. I’m not a journalist, I’m not on active duty and I’m not a resident of Building 18. I’m just a guy with money enough for a blog and unique access to Walter Reed.

    My history with Walter Reed goes back to 1993 when the Army finally discovered I had a severe hearing loss and sent me to Walter Reed from Fort Drum to get my spanking new hearing aids. I spent five days in a place called Walter Reed Hotel across Georgia Avenue from the Army facility. It was a shit hole; exposed wiring, filthy floors, rancid-smelling bedding, inattentive civilian staff, etc. But I was an infantryman – I was just happy to have a roof over my head That doesn’t excuse the conditions, but it does explain where I’m coming from. The building is still there, but as near as I can tell, the Army doesn’t use it anymore.

    My next contact with Walter Reed was when my wife started working there in 2002 as a civilian contract healthcare professional. Since then, I’ve had the pleasure of meeting several civilian, reserve and active duty nurses, technicians and doctors on whom I’d bet my life. In fact, I moved my treatment for my heart disease to Walter Reed because of problems I’d had with the administrative staff at the VA (the same problem that we don’t discuss here in DC). My cardio doctor, a lieutenant colonel, is one of the nicest, most caring, and most professional doctors I’ve ever known.

    I had my gall bladder removed in 2003 there at 1 AM one morning and the treatment I got there was definitely world-class. The surgical team and the folks who cared for me in recovery were real professionals. Anyone who says otherwise about the medical staff at Walter Reed will earn a world class asswhoopin’ from me.

    Every Saturday morning, I eat breakfast at the Walter Reed messhall (I know it’s called a dining facility or D-FAC these days, but it’ll always be a messhall to me) mainly because I enjoy being surrounded by heroes – but also because I have a thirty-year love affair with SOS. This morning was no exception.

    The first thing I noticed after we parked in the underground parking garage was a senior NCO going from his car to the hospital with some gear slung over his shoulder. His Shinseki beret was cocked on the back of his head and the flash was over his left ear. I know that doesn’t sound important to many of you, but as an old infantry NCO, it rankled me. NCOs just don’t do that, I don’t care who you think you are.

    The hospital was busy for a Saturday morning, but that was understandable since the chief had been fired yesterday and his boss had quit soon after. But when I got in one of the elevators, I noticed one of the handrails was loose – the handrails that folks who need to steady themselves with when they’re on crutches, or guide themselves when they’re in a wheelchair. Any NCO with a leatherman on his belt could’ve fixed it – or supervised a private fixing it.

    When we got to the third floor, I noticed an odor that every NCO who has ever inspected his barracks would recognize. The floor had been mopped with a dirty mop. Sure enough when I looked down, there were streaks on the tile floor where the dirt on the floor had been moistened and smeared across the tiles. The floor of the hospital outside of the dining facility was filthy.

    Now, I’ve taken over platoons that had the same kind of symptoms Walter Reed seems to have. And I know what the cure is – some of my readers may have painful reminders of my treatments. But the place I’d start at Walter Reed is with the NCO corps. Firing the generals doesn’t fix problems when the problems are just attention to detail items like NCOs out of uniform, loose railings and dirty floors. The NCOs need to be taught to supervise. Some of you may remember how I fixed the broken platoon I took to Desert Storm by fixing the NCO corps.

    The problem at Walter Reed is deeper than that, though. Walter Reed is located in one of the worst neighborhoods in Washington, DC. It draws it’s labor force for day-to-day maintenance operations from that neighborhood. Many of them think that the hardest part of their job is the interview, the rest is all downhill from there. Sometimes the hallways are lined with maintenance staff resting or standing about bullshitting. Hollering to your buddy or to a pretty lady in the halls of the wards is commonplace and tolerated by the military staff because they really don’t know how to talk to civilians. I’ve even observed horseplay on occasion behind the serving line in the messhall.

    I’ve also talked to people who tell me that even though work orders are put in for dangerous and potential sanitation violations, the maintenance staff either ignores their responsibilities, or makes half-assed repairs that must be work ordered again later. Most of these employees are tenured either by the job position or by personal relationships and don’t have to fear being fired – short of committing murder. And since the military are not accustomed to interacting with the local civilian staff, shortcomings are overlooked.

    That particular problem has been remedied though. Walter Reed is slated for closure and its facilities are being moved to upscale Bethesda, MD and to Fort Belvoir, VA where a more reliable workforce will be eager, at least initially, to tend to their responsibilities. That is why the DC government is so worried about the local job-loss for the current crop of derelicts mopping the floors with dirty mops at Walter Reed.

    Although I’m not completely exonerating the Bush Administration for the maintenance infractions at Building 18, I honestly don’t believe that they are completely to blame. Apparently, the money was available, but the maintence staff was negligent.

    But it is also my considered opinion that the NCO corps at Walter Reed is largely to blame, for allowing their standards of soldiering to slip. I hesitate to use the term “REMFS” or “pogues” because only a few of the NCOs at Walter Reed haven’t been to a theater of combat recently, however, they’ve let duties in the rear relax their standards which ultimately cost their boss his job.

    If I were the Sergeant Major at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, I’d start Monday morning with an in-ranks inspection of every NCO assigned there, remind them that NCOs are ultimately responsible for the reputation of their commander, as well as the Army and rebuild my NCO ranks from there.

    Basic soldiering is the best soldiering.

  • Reality starts seeping in

    Apparently, Congress is waking up to the fact that the majority of Americans actually want to win the war in Iraq. According to S.A. Miller of the Washington Times;

    Republicans in Congress — including most who have defected from President Bush’s plan to send reinforcements to Iraq — have closed ranks and are prepared to thwart the Democrats’ continued efforts to undermine the war strategy.
        Most of the 17 House Republicans who voted for a resolution against the troop-surge plan — which was about half the number predicted by Democrats — now oppose moves to cut war funding or attach conditions to appropriations bills that would hamstring the war effort.
        All but one of the seven Senate Republicans that backed the anti-surge resolution in their chamber say they will not support any funding cuts. The one other dissident Republican — Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska — declined to comment on the issue.
        “I don’t think we should micromanage the war or tie the president’s hands,” said Rep. Thomas M. Davis III, a Virginia Republican who last month voted with Democrats to pass a nonbinding resolution disapproving of Mr. Bush’s plan to deploy 21,500 more troops.
        “The question of the surge was one of policy [and] an opportunity for me to express my frustration with the policy,” Mr. Davis said. “But when it comes to conducting the war, that is the president’s authority. … We have to close ranks behind him and allow this [plan] to work.”

    What else could make those purely political animals do such a sudden about face unless it’s the realization that Americans aren’t supporting their stance against the President.

    Republicans aren’t the only ones. Donald Lambro of the Washington Times writes;

    A senior Democratic adviser said yesterday he is disappointed and dismayed by the efforts of House and Senate Democrats to change administration policies in Iraq, predicting they would lead to further division and stalemate in Congress on the war.
        “If you stand back, the whole debate has been pretty frustrating. The bigger problem is that [Democratic leaders’] proposals are not going anywhere, such as some revised authority for the war,” said Leon Panetta, a key Democratic member of the Iraq Study Group whose proposals to stabilize Iraq were largely dismissed by President Bush.
        “But those efforts are doomed. Either they are going to be blocked in Congress or vetoed by the president, or both. The end result is that it will make us more divided and impotent on war policy,” President Clinton’s former White House chief of staff said in an interview with The Washington Times.
        Mr. Panetta’s blunt complaints about how his party has bungled the war debate underscores a partywide discomfort among many Democrats that their leaders have failed to craft a politically viable compromise that can draw some bipartisan support.

    And Panetta’s not the only one;

     “A lot of [the Democrats’] efforts have been pointless,” said Michael O’Hanlon, a senior foreign policy analyst at the Brookings Institution who advises Democrats on national security issues.
        “So I think, rather than monkeying around [with anti-war legislation], they should wait until the fall and basically say, whether you like Bush’s handling of the war or not, at least recognize it is reasonable that it could work and give it six more months,” Mr. O’Hanlon said.

    So, everyone is beginning to realize that the voters’ revolt against the Republican congress wasn’t about the President at all. It was about AMericans’ frustration with Republicans in Congress and their inability to run it with any semblance of order. Now the Democrats are beginning to realize that they didn’t win the election because of President Bush at al, no matter how hard they tried to make it about him. And the group they’ve been pandering to are just a tiny bunch of whackos trying to end the war for their own selfish reasons.

    Nothing in the Washington Post about this. Only stories about the chief of Walter Reed being fired and some Congressional Democrat who happened to be an Iraq vet. I guess the fact that the Democrats are losing their one big issue isn’t worth a column inch or two.

  • Dems porkin’ out on defense money

    Now we find out why the Democrats really want to restrict funding for the war. The AP writes;

    The expected battle with the White House over the add-ons is getting far less attention than debate over Iraq, but it could reveal a lot about how much Democrats will be able to rewrite the president’s budget later this year.

    Bush has yet to veto a spending bill, and Democrats are gambling he’ll sign the Iraq measure despite objections to spending he didn’t seek. Republicans, meanwhile, would be reluctant to vote against the package since it contains funds for U.S. troops overseas.

    Both Democrats and Republicans are pushing extra spending into the war funding bill as they seek to advance pet projects that likely would fail if advanced on their own.

    In a related AP piece, the highlights of the Democrats’ wishlist are;

    _$3.4 billion for housing assistance and infrastructure improvements associated with Hurricane Katrina.

    _$200 million for other agencies.

    Potential congressional add-ons to the bill:

    _$4 billion in drought relief for farmers in the Great Plains.

    _$3.1 billion for military base construction and closings.

    _$1.3 billion for New Orleans levee improvements.

    _$1.2 billion in relief, unemployment, food and housing aid arising out of a freeze that destroyed citrus, avocado and other crops in California’s Central Valley.

    _$745 million to deal with a shortfall in the State Children’s Health Insurance Program in 14 states.

    _$400 million for a one-year extension of payments to rural counties in the Pacific Northwest to make up for timbering cutbacks in national forests.

    More dirty politics from the dirty politics people.