Author: Jonn Lilyea

  • Clinton II; Libby pardon was cronyism

    I’m still trying to catch up on the news after being in the hinterlands among people who are more worried about the lack of rain for this year’s sweet corn harvest than they are worried about politics. I figured that the Libby thing would be played out by now, but being among real people made me forget that Republican transgressions are always much more serious than those of the Democrats – well, for the media and the Congressional Democrats anyway.

    I dipped in my toe this morning by watching Fox News Sunday which had my idiot, pussy, partisan Congressman Chris VanHollen as a guest. And so I can always count on him to get my blood pressure up – because it reminds me of how stupid my neighbors are for electing the moron to Congress. He was one of the first to pile on the Army over the conditions at Walter Reed, then when the Army tried to speed up construction of the new Walter Reed facilities in Bethesda, VanHollen stepped in to delay construction because it’d disrupt his commute in the morning.

    So I jumped over to the Fox News website and watched Hillary Clinton call the Libby pardon “cronyism”(Video). Cronyism? Can she be serious? Or does she forget that we can google a search of her husband’s pardons – he pardoned murderers, terrorists and drug dealers as well as cronies. In fact Clinton, pardoned more people on January 20th, 2001 than President Bush has pardoned in the last six years.

    Clinton pardoned contributors, disgraced cabinet members, Susan MacDougal who kept his secrets in prison (unlike her husband who mysteriously died when he was about to tell what he knew), Clinton’s own drug dealing half-brother, a disgraced CIA director who was under investigation for pilfered national secrets. But pardoning Libby is “cronyism” – despite the fact that Libby wasn’t the criminal the special prosecuter was looking for, or involved in the incident that the prosecutor was investigating.

    This extent of partisanship probably borders on Democrats being criminally partisan.

  • My annual pilgrimage home

    Tomorrow, early in the morning, I begin my annual pilgrimage back home to Mom’s house to make up for a year of neglecting the poor soul. So that means I won’t be posting until Sunday – hopefully one of my guest bloggers will take up the mantle and bless us with their ruminances.

    In the meantime, I’ve lifted the restrictions on comments, so all comments will appear instantaneously even if its your first comment. If you want to cuss me out – here’s your opportunity to do so. Consider this an open thread for the weekend.

    Please wipe your feet, don’t fiddle with the liquor cabinent lock – and use a coaster! And visit Sergeant Grumpy, the newest addition to blogs linking here.

  • Independence Day

    I’ve always been amazed at how Americans take their freedom and their country for granted. Being a bit of an amateur historian, I like to visit places like Jamestown and Williamsburg to experience pre-Revolution days and for a moment imagine what it was like to live in that world – a world ruled by infallible Kings who wrote the law to benefit themselves, who taxed the labor of their subjects, not to benefit those subjects, but to swell their own coffers and expand their empires.

    It’s cliche now to mention that people came to America for freedom – economic and spiritual freedom - but they found it here, only by the virtue of distance and time. The further the colonists got from their King, they earned more and kept more of their own money. The more decisions they could make for themselves, without restrictions from government, the better their lives became.

    In 1630, John Winthrop wrote about the promise of a new future for the world as he hopefully crossed the Atlantic towards that new beginning;

    …men shall say of succeeding plantations: the lord make it like that of New England: for we must Consider that we shall be as a City upon a Hill, the eyes of all people are upon us….

    As the English king reached further and further into the colonies, colonists moved further inland to keep their freedom – until King George blocked their expansion at the Pre-emption Line to keep people from running ahead of his grasp – then mercilessly taxed every aspect of their lives. But that was the way of the world – there was no other system of government, until the colonists declared themselves independent.

    I like Ronald Reagan’s recitation of history;

    I have always believed that this land was placed here between the two great oceans by some divine plan. It was placed here to be found by a special kind of people–people who had a special love for freedom and who had the courage to uproot themselves and leave hearth and homeland and come to what in the beginning was the most undeveloped wilderness possible. We spoke a multitude of tongues–landed on this eastern shore and then went out over the mountains and the prairies and the deserts and the far Western mountains of the Pacific, building cities and towns and farms and schools and churches.

    If wind, water or fire destroyed them, we built them again. And in so doing at the same time we built a new breed of human called an American–a proud, an independent and a most compassionate individual for the most part. Two hundred years ago Tom Paine, when the thirteen tiny colonies were trying to become a nation, said we have it in our power to begin the world over again….

    And our forebearers did begin the world again and we became Winthrop’s “shining city on a hill”. Every nation that has thrown off the chains of tyrants, has done so using our revolution as a model. Every new Constitution has been modeled after our own. Slaves in Haiti threw out their French masters, Bolivar in South America threw out the Spaniards.

    The French saw promise in our revolution, but being typically French, they screwed it up four times before they finally got it right. I remember that I saw the key to the Bastille on the wall in the entry-way of George Washington’s Mount Vernon home given to him by Lafayette as a reminder that America deserved credit for the liberation of the people of France from their own despotic king.

    Americans did change the world that July 4th 231 years ago – not that we get much credit for it anymore. Maybe it’s because we ourselves call it plainly by it’s date, July 4th, instead of it’s meaning – Independence Day.

    Kate republishes the Declaration of Independence, and Spanish Pundit wishes us a happy Fourth. Mike at Flopping Aces tells us what Independence Day means to him (and should for you) While Scott Malensek at Flopping Aces writes an updated Declaration. Cuban-American Marc Masferrer at Uncommon Sense pays tribute to the First Amendment. Val Prieto at Babalu Blog, also a Cuban-American, thanks America for the opportunity this country has provided. Atlas Shrug’s Pamela Geller Oshry quotes Ronald Reagan today, too.

    But on a sad note, I mark the passing of a blogger – the first blogger to ever link to me. He or she is still alive and kicking, I presume, but we’ve lost some brilliant commentary from On the Radar – lost to political correctness and the lack of free speech in academia.

    Borrowing from my friends at Hang Right Politics, who named their blog from Benjamin Franklin’s famous phrase; “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”  

  • Spector needs a copy of the Constitution

    According to John Stanton of Roll Call, Arlen Specter is pushing a bill to limit the scope of presidential signing statements;

    Frustrated by the Bush administration’s continued use of presidential signing statements to challenge or ignore provisions of Congressionally approved legislation, Senate Judiciary ranking member Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) has reintroduced legislation to rein in President Bush’s ability to use the tactic.

    Specter, who has long been a critic of Bush’s use of signing statements, quietly introduced his Presidential Signing Statements Act of 2007 on Friday.

    “The president cannot use a signing statement to rewrite the words of a statute nor can he use a signing statement to selectively nullify those provisions he does not like,” Specter said in a floor statement.

    “The Constitution grants the president a specific, narrowly defined role in enacting legislation. … The Constitution provides that when a bill is presented to the president, he may either sign it or veto it with his objections. He may also choose to do nothing, thus rendering a so-called pocket veto. The president, however, cannot veto part of a bill, he cannot veto certain provisions he does not like.”

    So what Specter is saying is that he doesn’t like the way the President interprets the laws Congress writes, so he wants to improve the President’s reading skills by taking the President to court. I guess that won’t slow down government much will it?

    But the only thing the Constitution says about the President’s responsiblity to execute Congress’ laws is “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.” Now that doesn’t sound very “specific or narrowly defined” to me, Senator.

    And I don’t think the founders were inclined towards one branch of government using another branch of government to bend the third branch of government to it’s will. I think the good Senator has lost more than his hair.

  • Latin America and the Democrats

    The Gateway Pundit has a great piece today about Democrats playing Russian Roulette with our foreign policy in regards to Latin America entitled FARC You! where he catalogues Democrat hypocrisy towards our allies in that region.

    The reason it caught my eye is some of the rhetoric I’ve been hearing from the Left in regards to the Bush Administration in Latin America that’s not exactly the truth. For example, Barack Obama has a statement on his senate.gov website that claims the Bush Administration isn’t engaged in Latin America;

    I am, however, disappointed that the President has fallen so short in his promise to transform U.S. relations with the Americas. Our regional relationships cannot be properly attended to with one six-day trip, a series of photo opportunities, and some lofty rhetoric on collaboration.

    Neglect? Why, just this week, the Bush Administration has finalized trade agreements with Peru, Columbia and Panama – to absolutely no fanfare in the press. because these trade pacts are all opposed by Big Labor. Oh, and they’re good for the US – can’t see the President getting good press over anything can we? These trade agreements give these country the ecomonic power to keep their residents at home instead sending them here as illegal immigrants. (Not to mention, it might drive the price of sugar down far enough that Coca Cola might put sugar in that drink again and make it tasty again)

    In Miami this week, Obama said, “It’s not sufficient for us to have Latin American policy based on not liking Hugo Chavez and not liking Fidel Castro.” That’s pretty simplistic rhetoric, actually. The Bush administration has pretty much ignored Chavez and Castro – I don’t see any statements coming out of the White House everytime Banana-brains starts yammering paranoid rants about someone wanting to kill his useless ass. I don’t think anyone in the Administration has even acknowledged that Chavez exists. His own people can deal with him – and Castro – phht – he’ll be dead soon enough, so who cares.

    President Bush even travelled around Central and South America in the Fall of 2005 – I left Panama the day before he arrived and it was the talk of the entire country. He’s a very popular figure there, despite the bad press.

    Think maybe our stature in Latin America has suffered because Democrats won’t meet with our greatest ally in the region President Alvaro Uribe has been snubbed by the Congressional Democrats as well as Al Gore. This from a Mary Anatasia O’Grady piece in the Wall Street Journal from April entitled “One Righteous Gringo“;

    Al Gore may not have known that he was taking the side of a former terrorist and ally of Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chávez when he waded into Colombian politics 10 days ago. But that’s not much consolation to 45 million Colombians who watched their country’s already fragile international image suffer another unjust blow, this time at the hands of a former U.S. vice president.

    The event was a climate-change conference in Miami, where Mr. Gore and Colombian President Álvaro Uribe were set to share the stage. At the last minute, Mr. Gore notified the conference organizers that he refused to appear with Mr. Uribe because of “deeply troubling” allegations of human- rights violations swirling around the Colombian government.

    It is not clear whether the ex-veep knows that making unsubstantiated claims of human-rights violations has been a key guerrilla weapon for more than a decade, along with the more traditional practices of murdering, maiming and kidnapping civilians. Nor is it clear whether Mr. Gore knew that the recycled charges that caught his attention are being hyped by Colombian Sen. Gustavo Petro, a close friend of Mr. Chávez and former member of the pro-Cuban M-19 terrorist group. What we do know is that Mr. Gore’s line of reasoning — that Colombia is not good enough to rub shoulders with the righteous gringos — is also being peddled by some Democrats in Congress, the AFL-CIO and other forces of anti-globalization. The endgame is all about killing the U.S.-Colombia Free Trade Agreement.

    When Mr. Uribe got wind of Mr. Gore’s decision to stand him up, he rightly interpreted its significance: Colombia is the victim of an international smear campaign that, if left unchecked, could undermine congressional support for the pending trade deal. Rather than let the whispering go on, Mr. Uribe elevated the matter, calling two press conferences over two days to refute the charges, which he says are damaging the country’s interests. He also asked Mr. Gore to look “at Colombia closely” so he could see the progress that has been made.

    By the way, President Uribe’s father was killed by terrorists – tough for them if he’s a little harsh in dealing with them. Since when is Al Gore willing to trade our friends down the river because he heard an unsubstantiated rumor somewhere?  

    So how exactly is Bush damaging our relations in Latin America? He’s got Democrats undermining his efforts with their petty politics, Democrats winging their way to Venezuela to gladhand with blood-soaked tyrants while they turn their backs on the people who are helping fight our enemies.

    Just like in the Middle East where Democrats have tea with our enemies and snub our allies. Maybe we have all of these problems because we present a fickle foreign policy – towards all of our allies and our enemies. Our foreign policy is ambiguous because we have 525 ambassadors in Congress – not to mention the ancillary ambassadors who are former presidents and vice-presidents. 

    I’m pretty certain that the founding fathers intended that the president be the sole voice of our nation to other nations. Maybe we need to impeach all of these extraneous diplomats floating around the world operating under a false flag.

  • Bush commutes Libby’s sentence – so?

    First – an admission. I was told about a month ago that this would happen, by a source I can’t name. See? I keep promises. I guess I could’ve written it as a prediction a week or so ago and looked like a fricken genius, but I never got all wrapped up in the minutae of the case. I just made an off-handed comment to someone that the sentence was excessive and that the judge, Reggie B. Walton, was an asshole – that’s when my source told me the back story. So there’s still stuff I know that I’m not telling. By the way, I will tell you that Judge Walton is not an asshole – that’s all I’m saying at this point.

    But let’s get to the drama queens – like Obama;

    “This decision to commute the sentence of a man who compromised our national security cements the legacy of an administration characterized by a politics of cynicism and division, one that has consistently placed itself and its ideology above the law,” Obama said. “This is exactly the kind of politics we must change so we can begin restoring the American people’s faith in a government that puts the country’s progress ahead of the bitter partisanship of recent years.”

    We already know that Libby didn’t leak Valerie Plame’s name to Bob Novak – the reason for the whole investigation in the first place. So, what national security issue are we talking about here, Barack? I wonder if he even knows what the case is about judging by that nonsensical statement.

    “Today’s decision is yet another example that this administration simply considers itself above the law,” said Clinton of Bush’s decision to commute Libby’s sentence. “This case arose from the administration’s politicization of national security intelligence and its efforts to punish those who spoke out against its policies.

    “Four years into the Iraq war, Americans are still living with the consequences of this White House’s efforts to quell dissent. This commutation sends the clear signal that in this Administration, cronyism and ideology trump competence and justice.”

    Does she think we just forgot about her first tour of the White House? Does she remember kathleen Wiley’s cat disappearing? Linda Tripp and others suffering the wrath of the IRS? And the only attempt to punish Joe Wilson for “speaking out” was made by Joe Wilson’s lyin’ mouth. Should I remind her that John Kerry dropped Wilson from his campaign website when it was proven that Wilson was nothing but a lying, self-serving primadonna?

    And the prettiest candidate ev-ver, John Edwards;

    “Only a president clinically incapable of understanding that mistakes have consequences could take the action he did today,” Edwards said. “President Bush has just sent exactly the wrong signal to the country and the world. In George Bush’s America, it is apparently okay to misuse intelligence for political gain, mislead prosecutors and lie to the FBI.

    “George Bush and his cronies think they are above the law and the rest of us live with the consequences. The cause of equal justice in America took a serious blow today.”

    Like John Edwards would know anything about being equal with the rest of us, or even anything about justice.

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said: “The President’s decision to commute Mr. Libby’s sentence is disgraceful. Libby’s conviction was the one faint glimmer of accountability for White House efforts to manipulate intelligence and silence critics of the Iraq war. Now, even that small bit of justice has been undone.

    “Judge Walton correctly determined that Libby deserved to be imprisoned for lying about a matter of national security,” Reid said. “The Constitution gives President Bush the power to commute sentences, but history will judge him harshly for using that power to benefit his own vice president’s chief of staff who was convicted of such a serious violation of law.”

    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said: “The president’s commutation of Scooter Libby’s prison sentence does not serve justice, condones criminal conduct, and is a betrayal of trust of the American people.

    “The president said he would hold accountable anyone involved in the Valerie Plame leak case. By his action today, the president shows his word is not to be believed,” Pelosi said. “He has abandoned all sense of fairness when it comes to justice, he has failed to uphold the rule of law, and he has failed to hold his administration accountable.”

    Reid and Pelosi had better check their hypocrisy meters on those statements and see how it pegs when the names William Jefferson and John Murtha are run through the meter. And it’s all hyperbole, any-damn-way.

    All of those Democrats act as if the rule of law has been tossed out the window – one guy who got railroaded by an over-excited prosecutor got an unreasonable sentence commuted. That’s it. He wasn’t even the target of the investigation – just an ancillary player.

    If they want to talk about breaches of national security and circumventing the rule of law, let’s talk about Sandy Berger and his reluctance to even meet the terms of his plea agreement. When the Democrats get their panties in a wad over that, maybe they’ll have some credibility on the Scooter Libby subject.

    The Bloodthirsty Liberal has more on the hypocrisy, Crotchety Old Bastard thinks it was a weak decision (so does the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal), Curt at Flopping Aces thinks the Left’s reaction will be pure entertainment for the rest of us, the editorial board of the Washington Post, typically a useless opinion, says that “Scooter Libby’s prison sentence was excessive, but so is President Bush’s commutation.”

    Mark Finkelstein at Newsbusters brings us the “Today” interview with Joe Wilson from this morning – as if Wilson has anything newsworthy to say about the case now. 

    Wesley Pruden gives the President “one cheer, but no more than two”;

    He spared Scooter Libby from prison, as decency demanded, but left intact a $250,000 fine, which can only be regarded as tribute to the venality of a special prosecutor and the vanity of a federal judge (both lawyers, after all).

    I guess that’s the only time that we’ll read that Libby still got hit with a $1/4mil fine.

  • So let’s start in with Iran, already

    Everywhere I look, I see reasons to use military force inside of Iran. For months now we’ve heard about the advanced conventional weaponry manufactured in Iran to use against US forces in Iraq. Now today I read that some Hezbollah doofus has been scooped up in Iraq while he was taking part in a direct-action operation directed and funded by Iranians;

    Ali Mussa Dakdouk, accused of being a senior Lebanese Hezbollah operative, was captured March 20 in southern Iraq, Brigadier General Kevin Bergner, a U.S. military spokesman, said. Dakdouk was “working in Iraq as a surrogate for the Iranian Quds Force,” organizing militants into cells for attacks on U.S. and Iraqi forces, Bergner said.

    He also said that Dakdouk was a liaison between the Iranians and a breakaway Shiite militant cell led by Qais al-Kazaali, a former spokesman for the cleric Moktada al-Sadr.

    Bergner said Kazaali’s group attacked a provincial government building in Karbala in January and that the Iranians assisted in the attack preparations. Khazaali and his brother, Leith al-Khazaali, were captured with Dakdouk.

    How much more proof do we need that we are currently at war with Iran? Well here’s some more proof from the Washington Post (in case you’re not convinced yet), which summarizes a briefing to journalists from a military spokesman;

    While U.S. officials have repeatedly alleged that sophisticated Iranian-made weapons are killing Americans in Iraq, and that the Quds force is complicit in the violence, today’s briefing offered the most specific accusations to date of direct Iranian involvement in specific attacks against U.S. forces.

    The general also drew a new link with Hezbollah, saying an operative arrested in March had spent the previous 10 months worked with the Quds force to train Iraqis after years of commanding a Hezbollah special operations group.

    “The Iranian Quds force is using Lebanese Hezbollah essentially as a proxy, as a surrogate in Iraq,” Bergner said. “Our intelligence reveals that senior leadership in Iran is aware of this activity.”

    Bergner’s briefing for reporters in Baghdad emphasized a Jan. 20 attack on a provincial government compound in the southern city of Karbala, where gunmen wearing American-style uniforms and driving sport utility vehicles breached the compound and killed five U.S. soldiers.

    And of course the Iranians deny involvement;

    Iran has denied past claims that it was backing Iraqi militants — including accusations that it was providing them with a particularly deadly type of roadside bomb, the explosively formed penetrator. Its ally Hezbollah has denied having any role in Iraq, saying it operates only in Lebanon.

    So despite the fact that we capture Hezbollah chieftains in Iraq, they’re not operating there. That makes perfect sense to me. Southern Iraq must be where they rest and recuperate in the off season. 

    And then, we read from the Associated Press, that Putin and the President both agree that something needs to be done about Iran’s nuclear program;

    President Bush and Russian President Vladimir Putin projected a united front Monday against Iran’s suspected nuclear weapons program.

    “When Russia and the United States speak along the same lines, it tends to have an effect and therefore I appreciate the Russians’ attitude in the United Nations,” Bush said. “We’re close on recognizing that we got to work together to send a common message.”

    Putin predicted that “we will continue to be successful” as they work through the U.N. Security Council.

    Oh, and did I mention that there are at least four American citizens being held hostage in Iran to forestall economic sanctions against the rogue nation? I say at least four because there’s a former FBI agent missing over there somewhere whom the Iranian government may or may not be holding.

    Iran has been begging for an airstrike for decades, and now is the time to do it. They’ve declared war on us almost every morning since 1979, they’ve walked over us, they’ve walked over our allies – because they know they can get away with it with no repercussions. It’s time to deal them a blow. And one good stiff air strike would rock the entire terrorist community back on their heels for a minute – probably exposing themselves and their cells in the ensuing flurry of activity to deal their own counter-blow.

    Fourth of July would be nice.

    Blackfive asks Can We Bomb Iranian Camps and Military Now?

    Crotchety Old Bastard finds Iran’s fingerprints on the Taliban, too.

  • So where is AP and the Washington Post on this atrocity story?

    The past few days I’ve written about poor journalism on the part of the Washington Post and the Associated Press regarding stories they’ve published about supposed atrocities that never happened – articles about Americans slaughtering innocent civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq.

    So where the hell are the Associated Press and the Washington Post on embedded independent reporter Michael Yon’s latest article, “Bless the Beasts and the Children“ (by way of Jewish Odysseus by way of Atlas Shrugs) about al Qaeda butchering an entire town in Iraq;

    I told the Iraqi commander, Captain Baker, that it was important that Americans see this; he took me around the graves and showed more than I wanted to see. He said the people had been murdered by al Qaeda. I made video of him speaking, and of the horrible scene. The heat and stench were crushingly oppressive and broken only by the sounds of shovels as Iraqi soldiers kept digging.

    My feelings mirror those of Jewish Odysseus;

    Mil-Blog Journalist Michael Yon [http://www.michaelyon-online.com/] deserves a Pulitzer for this story alone, the latest in a long string of superb battlefield reports.

    You haven’t seen a word about this anywhere in the MSM, have you?

    But, hey, I hear a prisoner in Gitmo was served COLD falafel this morning…Let’s send a camera-team to confront Gates!  

    Or let some legislature member in Afghanistan accuse Americans of murdering over a hundred civilians, or some anonomous Iraqi “police” officer accuse Americans of slaughtering Iraqis in their beds as they sleep and the journalists in their hotel rooms go into a writing frenzy.  

    So why aren’t there more stories that justify our actions in Iraq? Because the media is afraid that the Left will accuse them of being a tool of the Administration – the Left doesn’t want the truth broadcast to Americans (see the latest dustup about reinstating the Fairness Doctrine) because the Left looks like a pack of knuckledragging, drooling morons when the light is shown on them. And thanks to the independent journalists who actually venture out into the battle with the troops, like Michael Yon, the mainstream press looks like the Left’s lapdog.

    Well, at least Fox News has the guts to run it.