Author: Jonn Lilyea

  • Wreath laying at Arlington’s Tomb of the Unknown Soldiers

    Today at the 11th Hour of the 11th Day of the 11th Month, Vice President Cheney laid a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldiers. We got there a little late, so a good samaritan took this video for me (YouTube link) from his more advantageous spot. If you’ve never been to a wreath-laying at Arlington, this is a better perspective than you get from the 10-second clips you get from the media on the nightly news. I cut down the 30-minute video to 9 minutes for YouTube upload.

    The reason we were late; I stopped by to see some old friends and I stopped at some regimental memorials like this one from my affiliated regiment the 325th Airborne Infantry of the 82d Airborne Division;

    I also took some photos after the crowd thinned out some while Mr. Cheney went in to attend the concert in the amphitheater.

    Notice the HUGE media coverage of the event – the premier Veterans’ Day event;

    There were actually two cameras during the ceremony – every other year I’ve come, the scaffolding was packed with cameramen – even the other year I came and VP Cheney did the ceremony in 2001. Love that media of ours.

    I had heard there was going to be trouble at the event and I saw some unsavory people on the subway train that got off there and that were hanging around after the ceremony outside of the Cemetary – like they were waiting for someone – but seein’s how it was pretty early in the morning, I doubt the other derelicts could bring themselves to get out of bed.

    While you’re surfing today, stop by and visit these bloggers (some of whom I picked at random from Technorati) who remembered today is Veterans’ Day;

    Crotchety Old Bastard

    Noblesse Oblige

    Hang Right Politics

    Protein Wisdom

    The Jawa Report

    Sister Toldjah

    Jammie Wearing Fool

    Danny’s Diversions

    Return of the Conservatives

    Old Controller

    Tired of all the Liberal Rhetoric out there

    Fookem and Bug

    Morewhat

    Miss Ladybug

    Rock the Truth

    Conservative Libertarian Outpost 

    Mirathon

    Rosemary’s Thoughts

    For the more cynical among us, 123beta is conducting a Veterans’ Day Leftist Blog Watch

    UPDATE: Loads of thanks to Illusion or Reality, Atlas Shrugs’ Pamela Geller, Chickenhawk Express’ Robin, Confederate Yankee, Blue Star Chronicles‘ Beth and Michele Malkin for linking me up.

  • Kerry threatens to run for Prez again

    I may be a little late on this, but I’ve got some things to say that need to be said. Illusion or Reality put up a link to a Boston.com story in which John Kerry threatened to make us endure another campaign season of his dorky face with that fake, droning voice;

    John Kerry said Monday there might be a next time for his presidential aspirations, and if there is, the 63-year-old U.S. senator from Massachusetts says he’ll be ready for the political torpedoes that helped sink his 2004 White House bid.

    Kerry, whose service as a U.S. Navy Swift boat skipper during the Vietnam War came under attack in his race against President Bush, said he has compiled a dossier on his war record critics that he wishes he had as the Democratic presidential nominee.

    “We have put together a documented portfolio that frankly puts their lies in such a total light of absurdity and indecency, that should they ever rear their ugly heads again, we have every single ‘t’ crossed and ‘i’ dotted, and I welcome that in a sense,” Kerry said following a morning address to the South Shore Chamber fo Commerce. “It’s a shame we weren’t able to produce all that at the time.”

    Kerry said he regrets his slowness to counter accusations from the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, which faulted Kerry’s war record and his subsequent anti-war activism.

    “I think the bigger problem was the campaign should have spent more money putting the truth out there,” Kerry said. “I think there was an assumption that is was out there, it was sufficiently out there.”

    I have news for that horsefaced loser; you don’t need documentation, all you need to do is sign your Form 180, which you promised to do three years ago. You looked foolish when you threatened to sue the Swiftboaters and the broadcasters that ran their ads. Then you didn’t even make it to trial when you realized your records would become part of the public record. You’ve promised to release your records COMPLETELY, but you’ve never followed through. If you think a correctly edited document from your team of shysters will impress this country’s veterans, you’re wrong.

    Getting the Democrat nod was a fluke – it’ll never happen again. Please don’t think for a minute that the American people want your screwy ass in the White House.

    The nail in your political coffin was; “I can’t overstress the importance of a great education. Do you know where you end up if you don’t study, if you aren’t smart, if you’re intellectually lazy? You end up getting us stuck in a war in Iraq. Just ask President Bush.” That “botched joke”.

    What veteran will forget these pictures;

    What American can forget this picture;

     

    Do us a favor and leave us alone, dorkboy. Your drag is old.

  • More Bolibanana Revolution news (Updated)

     

    I borrowed that Bolibanana Revolution tag from my good friend, Kate, I hope she doesn’t mind. But while the world and the media are fixated on Pakistan, violence and protests continue in Venezuela. From the Washington Times;

    Four police officers were shot and wounded during student protests yesterday in the city of Merida in an escalation of violent demonstrations against President Hugo Chavez’s plan to scrap term limits and extend his rule indefinitely.

    Antonio Rivero, head of Venezuela’s Civil Protection agency, told the Reuters news agency by telephone that the officers were shot while trying to break up clashes between opposing student groups in the Andean city.

    Chavez is worried that movement aganst his reforms could gather steam behind the resignation of his chief military minister;

    And opposition leaders seem wary of throwing their support behind retired Gen. Raul Baduel, a former defense minister who turned his back on Chavez this week to start a campaign against the constitutional reforms. Venezuela’s opposition has rushed to support defectors before _ only to see them return to the Chavez fold once it became clear he would keep the upper hand.

    Chavez is “worried, and he’s got reasons to be worried because this could build and he’s smart enough to realize that,” said Michael Shifter at the Inter-American Dialogue think tank in Washington. But he added that it’s “very unlikely that Chavez is going to lose at the ballot box because the opposition is still weak, divided and has a hard time coming up with a common strategy.”

    Chavez and his allies are comparing the political atmosphere to agitation in 2002 and 2003 that culminated with a botched military rebellion and nationwide strike. The unrest left the opposition demoralized and allowed Chavez to consolidate his power over the oil industry and the military.

    But it was Baduel who played a major role in returning Chavez to power during the 2002 coup, and his defection raised the spector of military discontent. Acknowledging Baduel’s words were like “gasoline,” Chavez gathered his military leaders this week to evaluate their possible impact.

    Dallas Blog, quoting a Financial Times story, explains that the rift in the military has been brewing for a few months;

    President Hugo Chavez created controversy earlier this year when he ordered members of Venezuela ’s armed forces to salute their superiors with the words, “Fatherland, Socialism or Death.”

    The Financial Times reports that “it fueled debate in the military over its involvement in politics and civil society – long a sensitive issue in Venezuela , not least since the failed coup five years ago against Mr. Chavez, in which factions of the military played key roles both in deposing him and reinstating him.”

    Kate translates from Venezuelan Maria Colmenares’ blog on the history of violence Chavez has used to against opponents;

    The assassinations committed by the government on 11 April 2002 constitute the permanent and systematic modus operandi of the Regime. The objective of this video –aside from providing new information on the events of 11A– is to anticipate a new massacre which is being prepared by government sympathizers, with the end of stopping the protests against the constitutional reform. It is explains to the national community “and especially to the international community” that, for the government, “the Revolution is above the life of Venezuelans,” and that each time the Regime feels threatened, it resorts to assassinations –using irregular groups– as a mechanism of repression and intimidation. To justify and cover up their crimes, the line of the government invariably alleges that it is defending itself from a “coup” orchestrated by the opposition. We count on you, pass it along, post it on your blog, here is the link:
    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3fhme_la-masacre-del-11-de-abril-fue-plan_news

    Reader Renwaa sends this link from Sultan Knish about the Shi’ite Venezuelan Deputy Justice Minister; 

    When students protesting Hugo Chavez’s plan to make himself into a dictator for life protested in Caracas chanting “Freedom”, the riot police that smashed through their ranks were under the supervision of Deputy Justice Minister Tarik or Tareck El-Aissami.

    In his early thirties Tarik El-Assimi is one of the younger men to have held such a post. His father Carlos el-Aissami headed the Venezuelan branch of the Baath Party, while his great-uncle Shibli el-Aissami was a close Saddam ally and served as assistant to the Secretary General of the Baath Party.

    Before the invasion of Iraq, Carlos El-Aissami held a press conference in which he described himself as a Taliban and called Osama Bin Laden, “the great Mujahedeen, Sheik Osama bin Laden”. The son, Tareck el-Aissimi who headed up Venezuela’s visa department and now serves as deputy justice minister, began as student union leader supervising drug dealing and a car theft ring, while intimidating his rivals. He maintained links to terrorist organizations. With the rise of Chavez, Tariq El-Aissimi’s rise began as well.

    It reminded me of the story from Jungle Mom about Hezbollah recruiting among Venezuelan indigenous population after Chavez booted the Christian missionaries out of Venezuela. All of this ties Venezuela to Iran. 

    Venezuelans are saying that the violence is inspired by the chavistas so the government can seize the universities and end the opposition;

    Higher Education Minister Luis Acuña, meanwhile, offered to send in troops to quell the violence, but university authorities quickly rejected the offer as an attempted power grab.

    “We won’t fall into the trap,” said Eleazar Narváez, rector of the Central University of Venezuela.

    Chávez’s opponents say the president has long wanted to end the autonomy of Venezuela‘s public universities, most of which are run by rectors associated with the opposition who defeated Chávez followers in campus elections.      

    Of course, Chavez’ revolution is completely funded by oil revenues, so it’s no surprise the day after Brazil announces a huge find off it’s coast, Chavez offers them membership in his club;

    Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez invited Brazil to join his “Petroamericas‘‘ initiative that aims to strengthen a regional energy alliance on the back of surging world oil prices.

    The initiative is seen as a rival to the U.S. economic influence, and it would integrate previous oil projects Petrosur, Petrocaribe and Petroandina, under which Venezuela agreed to sell fuel to other countries in the region on preferential terms.

    Chavez has said the energy alliances will challenge U.S. domination in the region and distribute fuel directly to avoid costly intermediaries.

    Actually, Chavez is trying to expand his influence in the region. He’s offered to build refineries in many non-oil producing Latin American countries to capture their support.

    The Devil’s Excrement translates an article that points out that while Chavez plays at being a diplomat, his people are running out of staples;

    There is no milk but there is yogurt. There is no sugar, but there is Splenda. There are no eggs, nor meat, nor rice, but there is caviar, salmon and all the things to make Sushi. What type of economy is this? Who are the geniuses that play politics in the name of the poor and the result is that all that is available are the goods for the rich?

    The battle against inflation does not only consists in that article do no go up in price, it is also necessary for goods to be on the shelves. Scarcity is the hidden face of inflation. When you try to fir into a corset, not even the economy, but human nature itself, the senseless signs of communism or Bolivarian socialism begin to appear: there is no milk for the kids, but there are I ported crackers for pets The Government knows it and I suppose they must be surprised at it. But its reaction, its next economic measures will likely be even worse. The little understanding, when it is not ideological denial of the basic rules of economics will take them to make the disequilibria even more extreme.

    And the English speaking Left still carry Chavez’ water – after all it’s only brown people suffering;

    The corporate-owned media is at it again, spreading lies and distortions about the peaceful and democratic Venezuelan revolution led by the government of President Hugo Chavez. The catalyst for the international media campaign is the democratic process in Venezuela to reform the existing constitution.

    The media ignores the content of the proposed reforms, which would significantly extend democracy and social justice. Instead, by taking a tiny minority of proposed changes out of context, they are present the reforms as a move by Chavez to establish himself as a “dictator-for-life”.

    This media campaign coincides with a fresh offensive inside Venezuela from the privileged elite, who, failing to defeat pro-Chavez forces at the ballot box, have before resorted to violent campaigns to overthrow the government. Chavez has won 11 straight national election victories since 1998, most recently Chavez was re-elected president last year with the largest number of votes in Venezuelan history. 

    I found this almost comical video of Chavez singing to his dying (dead) mentor last month in Havana. I say almost “almost comical” because the reality of the two subjects of the video make it impossible to laugh.

    Speaking of Castro, Babalu Blog’s Ziva writes;

    We know that Hugo Chavez is a dictatorial thug who intends to emulate fidel castro, and rule Venezuela for life. The violence the media reports as disturbing now, is less so than the unreported government sanctioned murder of 6 thousand Venezuelans, documented in IACHR’s 2006 Annual Report. The violence we are witnessing now is less disturbing than will be the inevitable “cleansing” of dissidents that will occur if this monster is not stopped.

    Who knows the effect of dictators in Latin America better than the Cuban ex-patriots? We’ve seen it all before – so why are we so fixated on the dealings of our allies when there are much more dangerous people we should be watching?

    As usual, Bloodthirsty Liberal puts a smile on my face after all of the dreary research.

    UPDATE: Jammie Wearing Fool reports that the Spanish King finally did what most of us would like to do;

    Spain’s King Juan Carlos told Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez on Saturday to “shut up” during closing speeches by leaders from the Latin world that brought the Ibero-American summit to an acrimonious end.

    “Why don’t you shut up?” the king shouted at Chavez, pointing a finger at the president when he tried to interrupt a speech by Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero.

    Proving Mel Brooks right – it’s good to be the King. Curt from Flopping Aces has the Spanish language video.

  • Do Democrats know we’re laughing AT them?

    While catching up with stuff, I read with interest the story on Rick Moran’s Right Wing Nut House about whacky Dennis Kucinich’s pandering to the Far Left Pro-defeat crowd by sponsoring impeachment articles against Dick Cheney;

    Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich expressed satisfaction Tuesday with a series of procedural twists on the House floor that resulted in the Ohio congressman’s impeachment articles against Vice President Dick Cheney being sent for committee review.A series of strategic maneuvers on both sides of the partisan aisle ended with a 218-194 vote along party lines to deliver the impeachment resolution to the House Judiciary Committee, the panel of jurisdiction for such matters.

    “This vote sends a message that the administration’s conduct in office is no longer unchallenged,” Kucinich said after the vote.

    Yeah, that’s what it does, Den. I guess if he figures he can act crazier than Ron Paul he can raise $4 million in one day, too, just by tapping the raving lunatics constituency (Kucinich supporters sound exactly like the pauliens, too). Moran continues that it’s not really a victory for Kucinich as he’d like us to believe;

    Republicans, changing course midway through a vote, tried to force Democrats into a debate on the resolution sponsored by longshot presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich. 

    The anti-war Ohio Democrat, in his resolution, accused Cheney of purposely leading the country into war against Iraq and manipulating intelligence about Iraq’s ties with al-Qaida.

    The GOP tactics reversed what had been expected to be an overwhelming vote to table, or kill, the resolution.

    Midway through the vote, with instructions from the GOP leadership, Republicans one by one changed their votes from yes to kill the resolution to no, trying to force the chamber into a debate and an up-or-down vote on the proposal.

    At one point there were 290 votes to table. After the turnaround, the final vote was 251-162 against tabling, with 165 Republicans voting against it.

    “We’re going to help them out, to explain themselves,” said Rep. Pete Sessions, R-Texas. “We’re going to give them their day in court.”

    So, Kucinich got his vote through because the Republicans are calling his bluff – to make him look foolish. Well, more foolish than he was looking last week as reported by The Gentle Cricket, anyway. 

    Moran says it best, though (as usual);

    The exquisite irony of watching Democrats fall all over themselves trying to kill impeachment after spending most of the last 7 years accusing Bush/Cheney of the most dire impeachable offenses was almost too delicious to watch. It showed the Democrats to be shallow political hacks, eager and capable of using rhetoric to undermine the presidency during a time of war but without the balls to match their actions to their words.

    Well, that’s not the end of the story, by any means. DUmmie FUnnies trolls the depths of undrained swamps to bring us these nuggets as Mad Dennis leads the nation’s whackiest over the cliff;

    “Dennis Kucinich just announced on the Ed Schultz show that John Conyers will hold hearings into the impeachment of Cheney. A full House vote yesterday would never have succeeded and would only have endangered red-state Democratic House members. But hearings could do the trick. I’ve been saying all along: Follow the Nixon impeachment playbook.”

    “I hope its true, last I heard from Conyers was they were discussing it, and then Wexler came out for it. Maybe Conyers listened to him and us.”

    “I doubt Articles of Impeachment will pass unless evidence of wrong doing is put forward and gathering that evidence seems to be not so easy. “ 

    They’re cute when they’re at their koolaid drinking best, aren’t they? The “Nixon impeachment handbook”? What the Hell is that? Nixon was never impeached. Oh, and I’m sure Conyers is listening to you – it’s real apparent that he’s not listening to anyone with any common sense – that leaves you.

    I doubt articles of impeachment will pass either – and my doubt has a lot to do with evidence, too. There is none – there’s only a bunch retards enamoured with the sound of their own voice and the echo they get from places like Democratic Underground.

    But, it turns out there are even whackier people with whackier theories than on DU;

    I propose a third, far more likely reason why the Democratic shmucks in congress won’t impeach Bush and Cheney.

    Nancy Pelosi, an ardent zionist, was told that Cheney must remain exactly where he is because Bush simply can’t launch another war before he leaves office without him – he’s too f*cking stupid.

    Conyers and the rest of them “won’t cross Pelosi,” not because they’re afraid of her sorry ass, but because they’re afraid of AIPAC, which will come down like a ton of bricks on anyone who dares impede their insane plans to launch a war against Iran.

    Of course, we all knew that somehow it was the joos. Still others see it as an opportunity for Ron Paul;

    Once again, this is a commanding moment for Ron Paul in influencing the direction of the nation by joining with Democrats to look more sharply upon the deeds of the current administration.

    Others don’t understand why Congress doesn’t bend to the will of 23% of Americans in a CNN poll.

  • Mr. Banana and his grand revolution

    While I was out of town, the Venezuelan Legislature rubber-stamped Chavez constitutional reforms. Michele Malkin reported it and asked where Sean Penn, Danny Glover and Naomi Campbell were.

    So with a referendum imminent, Venezuelan students took to the streets again this week, with grave results.

    Photos from Venezuela News and Views

    The Devil’s Excrement has unmasked the shooter in the second photo;

    And he also has photos of the getaway vehicles;

    Notice it’s a police vehicle – which explains why the shooters were able to pass through the police lines without being apprehended after shooting at least nine protesters.

    The AP described the incident;

    In fighting that included gunfire, teargas and stone-throwing, some pro-Chavez men were trapped in a faculty building surrounded by opponents until others burst into the campus on motorcycles, shooting in the air to rescue them.

    However The Devil’s Excrement explains it differently;

    While we have known that the Chavez Government lacks scruples and has an absolute disregard for the law and the truth, it never ceases to amaze us how cynical they can be in terms of distorting the truth. The savage and brutal attack on the students by a group of Chavista thugs is quickly becoming a sort of Puente del Llaguno II, where the hoodlums that attacked the students returning unarmed from their peaceful march are now supposed to have cornoered and attempted to lynch the “poor” Chavistas who were at the University.

    First of all, pro-Chavez and anti-Chavez students coexist peacefully at Central University, so there is no explanation for this sudden impulse to lynch them. They have faced each other in debates and elections and there has only been violence whenever outside groups have gone in and stirred it up. Like yesterday.

    Let us first recall, that at around 4 PM, the Vice-Minister of the Interior and Justice sent police groups to all entrances of Central University and appeared on TV saying that he was doing this to stop any extraneous groups from creating violence. Why did he do this and why did he say it? Then the violence began and in most of the videos and pictures (there is one in my mind that is not clear if the guy is  part of the pro-Chavez thugs or not) those armed, organized and attacking the students with weapons and on motorcycles are pro-Chavez groups. 

    CNN reports (hat tip to QandO) that Chavez, in true Orwellian language, beseeches the Venezuelan Right to avoid the “facist path” of violence;

    President Hugo Chavez condemned Venezuela’s opposition on Friday for resorting to “fascist violence” in protesting constitutional changes that would greatly expand his power.

    Police officers fire tear gas and rubber bullets at university students protesting Thursday in Caracas, Venezuela.

     But Chavez did not respond to accusations that his government is responsible for the upheaval.

    Portraying his political foes as anti-democratic right-wingers, Chavez accused opponents of seeking help from Washington and Venezuela’s military.

    “I urge the people of the right not to go down the fascist path,” Chavez told state television from Santiago, Chile, where he was attending a summit of Latin American leaders. “They generally take the path of fascist violence and confront the laws and the people, and they are always looking to the Pentagon, high-ranking generals.”

    Dislike for Chavez is apparently not confined to Venezuela according to Reuters;

    Protesters for and against Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez got into shoving matches outside Venezuela’s embassy in Chile on Thursday as leaders from the Latin world arrived at a summit to discuss tight energy supplies and other issues.

    The leftist Chavez, a strident antagonist of Washington who has used his country’s oil wealth to spread influence in Latin America, has supporters among some Chilean leftists but others declared him an unwelcome guest ahead of his expected arrival. 

    So what was Chavez doing while Venezuelans were being gunned down in the streets? Meeting with thugs from FARC, of course;

    President Hugo Chavez met with a representative of Colombia’s largest guerrilla group Thursday, saying he and Luciano Marin Arango held their first talks aimed at negotiating a swap of rebel-held hostages for jailed guerrillas.

    “We are here trying to put the pieces to together” for an agreement, Chavez told state television as Marin Arango, better known by his nom de guerre Ivan Marquez, stood next to him on the steps of Venezuela’s presidential palace.

    Reuters wrote that Venezuelans are flocking to Panama, something I can attest to, having just returned from Panama City myself;

    Wealthy Venezuelans are emigrating to Panama in increasing numbers, snapping up luxury homes as they fear their leftist President Hugo Chavez will hold onto power for life and rebuild the country in the image of Communist Cuba.
     
    With a shining new skyline, Panama is starting to rival Miami as a center for Venezuelan expatriates, who are attracted by the Central American country’s booming economy and a lively Caribbean culture like their own.

    But they’re driving up real estate prices and pricing Panamanians right out of the market. Panmanians are already blaming their economic problems and their social stagnation on Venezuelans and Columbians. 

    Chavez is making emigration more difficult according to Venezuelans and Panamanians I talked to there. Chavez has said he’ll allow adults to leave Venezuela but their children must remain behind (to get that mandatory indoctrination Chavez demands). He’s also trying to limit the amount of money they can take out of the country to about $5000/year. Those two measures should pretty much prevent anyone from leaving. People I talked to in Panama compared it to East Germany’s wall.

    American Leftists continue to write idiocy to support Chavez and his grand experiment in “dual power”, because afterall, it’s only brown people who’ll suffer;

    These perspectives are erroneous, since they cannot account for what have emerged as the central planks of the revolutionary process. I will focus on the most significant of these planks: the explosion of communal power.

    Communal councils in Venezuela are merely Chavez’ rat patrols set up to skirt the influence of local elected officials who stand in his way to control every aspect of Venezuelan life. If Chavez believed in democracy, as he claims, he’d concede to local elected government. But of course he doesn’t – the reason for the existence of communal councils.

    But, he insists his reforms are democratic;

    The socialism that Venezuela is constructing is “totally democratic and humanist,” Chavez reiterated, and the reforms, which recognize new forms of collective, communal, and social property alongside private property, as well as giving more power to grass roots communal councils and social programs, among other changes, aim to establish “a communal, socialist economic system in each commune.”

    He explained, “this economic system will be managed by everyone, by all the constituents of the communes.”

    For example, he argued, gas stations would be managed by the communes, and that the income from this could be used to provide resources for social programs and community projects.

    To democratise the economy, Chavez argued, “Is the only way to defeat poverty, to defeat misery and achieve the largest sum of happiness for the people,”

    However, he said, this contradicts the interests of capitalism and imperialism, and an international media campaign to demonize the reforms and the revolutionary government in Venezuela, has already begun, in order to justify a possible military coup or foreign intervention.

    “This is a battle, a political war, it is part of an international conflict,” he continued, “because we have declared ourselves free, and we are constructing freedom and imperialism is not going to take away our vision.”

    Funny how the Left always sees politics as a war and a struggle against some invisible enemy – like the Democrats in the US who proclaim that they want to fight for me.

    Katy from Caracas Chronicles highlights the real difference between the two sides;

    So while we contemplate with horror how students are attacked, let’s keep our heads cool and remember a few key ideas:

    1. We offer reconciliation and peace, chavismo offers violence. This idea may sound like a cliché, but it should be the core of our message, and this has practical implications. Restraint is the key here. If we defend ourselves using violence, we can no longer confidently say that we are for reconciliation.

    Kate from A Columbo-Americana’s Perspective links to a Noticias24 story about the defacement of a mural equating Che to Simon Bolivar painted by socialist students at the Central University;

    I guess that’s a whole lot better than getting shot, isn’t it?

  • Phony soldiers; things I can get away with writing

    I’ll begin this with some background for the first time readers who will not have the energy to bother checking my “About” page before they email me with their false outrage. I spent twenty years in the Airborne and Bradley Infantry – I wore maroon, black and green berets all within the first six years of my career. I volunteered last year to go back on active duty – after being out for 14 years – because my country asked me. My son is currently an Air Force Staff Sergeant on active duty, my father was in the Navy during the Korean War, my niece (Army Reserve) and her husband (USMC) were both tapped for active duty service Iraq. All of my friends are or were on active duty. I have no friends who haven’t been on active duty. I’m no “chickenhawk”. Period.

    So why did I say all of that? Well, I just finished reading the latest at Chickenhawk Express and it got my blood boiling and I’ve got some things to say that I can get away with, while people like Rush Limbaugh can’t get away with saying.

    There’s a common thread that runs through all of these IVAW folks – they’re proven liars and sociopaths. This one that Robin wrote about, Clifton Hicks, is no different. At Hick’s IVAW “Back to Baghdad” fantasy tale about his so-called service in Iraq, he starts out telling lies;

    I grew up in Savannah, Georgia, right near Fort Stewart, and I’ve always remembered what a big deal it was when 3rd ID came home in ’91.

    If Hicks remembered the 3ID coming home, he lived in Germany because that’s where the 3ID called home at the time. The 24th Infantry Division came home to Fort Stewart in 1991. Anyone living in Savannah, Georgia at the time would have known that. The people in Savannah loved their 24th Division – many of the members of that division were from Savannah. Hicks is lying.

    So we get treated to more lies about this cumbubble’s so-called service;

    We were tucked away in the shittiest part of the base, behind two concrete walls and a canal, about a mile and a half from all the luxurious MWR facilities that we either weren’t allowed in or never had time to visit. We occupied old Iraqi Army barracks that besides being poorly built were of course plagued by rats and giant camel spiders who pestered us relentlessly. We lived off of junk food, MRE’s, and the rancid, fly ridden slop from our DFAC when we were desperate. A health inspector actually came by one day and demanded that our DFAC be shut down, but the Squadron Commander and Sergeant Major fought it and they stayed open.

    That, my friends, is an outright lie. No commander, nor sergeant major, would tolerate unsanitary conditions in their mess hall. No squad leader, platoon sergeant, first sergeant would tolerate it. Mess sergeants are proud of the way they can feed nourishing food anywhere under any conditions. “Rancid, fly-ridden food” would never get to a soldier’s mouth. Having been an Infantry Platoon Sergeant, I know how important chow and sanitary conditions are to the successful completion of the mission.

    Now let’s look at this picture from Hick’s photo gallery at IVAW;

    Hick’s calls the photo “My First Notch” implying that as an M1 driver, he killed the driver of the vehicle with his tank. The only problem is that the photo is taken from the gunner’s position on the M1. If there is indeed a dead person in that car, and if indeed the M1 killed him, the photographer wasn’t driving the tank.

    In another interview, Hicks described “the wedding incident”

    Hicks is haunted by his activity in Iraq. He talks about what he calls the “wedding party incident.” His unit was on patrol when they heard shooting between US armed forces and what they thought were Iraqi insurgents. While Hicks prepared to go house to house in search of the enemy, what he discovered instead was a wedding. Some of the men had been shooting rifles into the air, as is customary during family parties and celebrations. Three people from the wedding were shot; a six-year-old girl was killed. When the platoon sergeant called the command center to report the incident, “all they said to us was ‘Charlie Mike,’ a stupid Army acronym for continue mission.”

    So, if that’s true, why didn’t Hicks report it higher? We all know what happened at Haditha when innocents were killed. If Hick’s conscience is bothering him, why doesn’t he give testimony to the incident instead of just yapping like a yorkie?

    In Hick’s Letter to Vets for Freedom;

    How come nearly every single one of you people that I’ve seen or read about are Lieutenants and Sergeants? When I look at your little war pictures and read your poorly written bio’s my vision is overflowed with images of lazy, incompetent, cowardly Officers with a handful of brain-dead NCO’s to do their dirty work, as usual. I wonder where you boys all served?

    So only Hick’s service can be considered heroic, I suppose. Anyone else was just a pogue. Funny, but while I served in the Infantry, I thought Cav pukes were pogues – the difference between me and Hicks; I grew out of it and honor everyone’s service.

    I have to snicker, though. He calls VfF members’ bios poorly written and then writes the awkward “…my vision is overflowed with images….” phrase. Editorial kharma got him.

    I suspect that Hick’s application for CO status stemmed from something more than what I can find. Some kind of childish misbehavior that he was trying to escape. I’m sure I’ll find it eventually – because there’s always a backstory to CO filings – in a volunteer military, people of coscience just don’t join.

    I had a soldier transferred to my platoon from another company where he had misbehaved. When he found out how tough life was going to be in my platoon, he threatened to file as a concientious objector unless we transferred him back with his buddies. I, of course, told him to file – I didn’t give a tiny little rat’s ass what the little punk did. But the sergeant major caved and transfered him to appease the little punk. The soldier went to the war and came back – so much for the “conscience” part of being a CO.

    Another soldier – the commander’s driver, if I’m not mistaken – went AWOL the morning we were scheduled to deploy to Iraq. When he called the commander, he claimed to be a CO – but it turned out that he just didn’t want to leave his German girlfriend unsupervised. He did 18 months at hard labor for thinking with his “other” head.

    Adam Kokesh, whom I’ve written about extensively here, was busted for smuggling an Iraqi pistol back from the war. Hardly the actions of someone who “questioned” the war. It was only after the Marines busted him a rank and then denied him the opportunity to return to Iraq did he suddenly decide the war is immoral.

    Lt. Ehren Watada, the youngster who volunteered for the Army didn’t become a CO until he’d been in the Army for three years – joining after the war in Iraq began. The little known fact is that Watada’s father had been a draft dodger during the Vietnam War. So, a logical person could conclude that Watada had joined the Army just to demoralize the troops – and to insure Democrat support in future elections.

    Those are the phony soldiers – the guys who turn their sociopathic behavior into something marketable to the eager press willing to pay in exposure and feed the phony soldiers’ need for attention. But attention away from their crimes and misbehavior, portraying themselves as noble men, when the truth is that they are nothing more than snake oil salemen.

    Scumbags all. These people don’t understand the concept of “selfless service” because in every action they take, it’s all about them. That’s why there are no conscientious objectors anymore – just a bunch of self-promoting morons with bouts of John F. Kerry syndrome.

    And yes, because they don’t think like me, they’re wrong – because they don’t want the war in Iraq to end. If the war ends, they’re just another footnote in the history books and maybe a “where are they now?” interview in twenty years or so.

    UPDATED: I forgot to add the link to The Sniper where my new buddy Thus Spake Ortner inspired this whole Hicks thing (from me, Robin and lately, GI Jane) in the first place. Compared to TSO and Robin, my rant is just a footnote.

  • Thanks to all

    Well, we’re back from our big adventure – great food, family, friends, cigars, beer and rum as evidenced by this picture of my brother-in-law at our annual family barbeque;

    I got to have yet another meal with Renwaa, a frequent visitor and occasional commenter here, in her fancy digs – right across the street from my hotel. She makes the best pork and appetizers, and she kept me talking politics into the wee-hours. It was our third and probably final meeting. Panama will seem empty without her. Thanks for putting up with us and feeding us, Renwaa.

    COB6, Don Carl and GI Jane did a great job of keeping the readers coming back – traffic stayed steady while I was gone. They’d added some variety to my usual stuff and it proved popular.

    I want to especially thank my regular readers for giving them the same support you’ve given me over the last year. Most of you are silent, but I know you’re there and I appreciate it. It seems a lot less like barking at the moon when I see you arriving by bookmarks and RSS feeds.

    I spent today trying to catch up with events and reading blog archives over the last week. I had Fox News Channel in the hotel, but I wasn’t in the hotel much, so I’m way behind. I’ll be back up to speed soon. I also invite my three supporters to continue posting here when the mood hits them.

    Thanks to everyone.

  • Sarkozy; America liberated us. This is an eternal debt.

     

    Photo from Whitehouse.gov

    Coming back from vacation, I’m trying to catch up news and found the headline quote in a link from Fausta’s Blog. I thought maybe I’d been away longer than a week – it was a quote we could have only dreamed of a scant few months ago. It’s been a long time since a French leader recognized the United States as anything except an adversary – most of my half-century of life on this planet.

    The quote (as reported by the BBC) from Sarkozy came from the speech he gave to Congress, but the rest of the paragraph is more heartwarming;

    “America liberated us. This is an eternal debt,” he said, adding: “I want to tell you that whenever an American soldier falls somewhere in the world, I think of what the American army did for France.”

    The BBC also reported that Mr. Sarkozy was at Mount Vernon yesterday discussing events with President Bush (press conference video here). That’s particularly significant to me because of what resides there (besides George and Martha Washington). On the wall in the entranceway to Mount Vernon hangs an ancient key.

    It’s the key to the west portal of the Bastille prison, where many of the French monarchy’s political prisoners were held. The storming of the Bastille on July 14th, 1789, to the French, equates to our own Boston tea party or the skirmish at Boston Commons. It was the opening salvo in their own fight for liberty.

    In 1790, General Lafayette sent the key to the Bastille to George Washington – to me, that key represents France’s indebtedness to the United States for influencing their own struggle for freedom. Unfortunately, that link has been diluted by five French constitutions, and communism (or socialism, or progressivism, or whatever you want to call that crappy religion to which the peawitted are clinging these days).

    I’ll never forget the first time I saw the key when the guide explained it’s history. Always the cynic, I thought “Ungrateful frogs”. I’d wished that the whole country of France could see that key on that wall – maybe it’d cause an national epiphany. Then I bought a replica which is now on my bookcase between the bronze busts of Washington and Reagan.

    Fausta quotes from the translation of Sarkozy’s speech to Congress earlier in the day;

    What makes America strong is the strength of this ideal that is shared by all Americans and by all those who love her because they love freedom.

    America’s strength is not only a material strength, it is first and foremost a spiritual and moral strength. No one expressed this better than a black pastor who asked just one thing of America: that she be true to the ideal in whose name he, the grandson of a slaves, felt so deeply American.

    I still can’t shake the feeling that I must be dreaming.

    Say Anything has video of Sarkozy’s speech to Congress. Rob echoed my thoughts exactly while I watched it;

    He speaks of America in such glowing terms that you almost wonder if he isn’t, in some ways, more American than certain Democrats I could think of.

    And if you went looking for reports of Mr. Sarkozy’s speech this morning in the Washington Post, you’d have been disappointed. The first article I came across was a Reuters attempt at serious journalism – which failed, by the way;

    French President Nicolas Sarkozy returned home on Thursday from Washington to face skepticism about his new transatlantic friendship and a month of strikes that signal a growing pile of domestic problems.

    I wonder when the rest of the Left is going to recognize America’s contribution to liberating the world.